In:Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages
Edited by Patrick Rebuschat
[Studies in Bilingualism 48] 2015
► pp. 275–300
Challenges in implicit learning research
Validating a novel artificial language
Published online: 24 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.12rog
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.12rog
This chapter documents some of the methodological challenges in the use of artificial grammars in second language research. In the three experiments reported here, participants were exposed to an artificial language system based on Czech morphology under incidental learning conditions. After several modifications to the design of Experiments 1 and 2, Experiment 3 provided evidence that learners can acquire knowledge of L2 case marking incidentally. Taken together, these three experiments illustrate the challenges that researchers can face when carrying out incidental learning research, in particular the often unreported difficulty in establishing an initial learning effect when piloting a novel, semi-artificial language system.
References (76)
Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 259–302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Andringa, S., & Ćurčić, M. (2015). How explicit knowledge affects online L2 processing: Evidence from differential object marking acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acqusition, 35(2), 237–268.
Braine, M.D.S. (1963). On learning the grammatical order of words. Psychological Review, 70(4), 323–348.
. (1966). Learning the positions of words relative to a marker element. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 532–540.
Brooks, P.J. & Kempe, V. (2013). Individual differences in adult foreign language learning: The mediating effect of metalinguistic awareness. Memory and Cognition, 41, 281–296.
Brooks, P.J., Kempe, V., & Sionov, A. (2006). The role of learner and input variables in learning inflectional morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 185–209.
Cobb, T. (2012). Web Vocabprofile, accessed 14 November 2012 from [URL], an adaptation of Heatley & Nation's (1994) Range.
Cook, V.J. (1988). Language learners’ extrapolation of word order in micro-artificial languages. Language Learning, 38, 497–529.
de Graaf, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249–297.
DeKeyser, R.M. (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of L2 grammar: A pilot study. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 188–94.
. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 379–410.
. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195–221.
. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell.
. (2002). Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.
. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.
. (2008). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 232–49.
Gómez, R.L., & Gerken, L.A. (2000). Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 178–186.
Gullberg, M., Roberts, L., & Dimroth, C. (2012). What word-level knowledge can adult learners acquire after minimal exposure to a new language? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 50, 239–276.
Gullberg, M., Roberts, L., Dimroth, C., Veroude, K. & Indefrey, P. (2010). Adult language learning after minimal exposure to an unknown natural language. Language Learning, 60, 5–24.
Grey, S. (2013). A neurocognitive investigation of bilingual advantages at additional language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University.
Grey, S., Williams, J.N., & Rebuschat, P. (2014). Incidental exposure and L3 learning of morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 1–34.
Hama, M., & Leow, R.P. (2010). Learning without awareness revisited. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(03), 465–491.
Hamrick, P. (2013). Development of conscious knowledge during early incidental learning of L2 syntax. Unpublished dissertation. Georgetown University.
Hulstijn, J.H. (1989). Implicit and incidental second language learning: Experiments in the processing of natural and partly artificial input. In H.W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Interlingual processing (pp. 49–73). Tubingen: Gunter Narr.
. (1997). Second language acquisition research in the laboratory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 131–43.
Hulstijn, J.H., Young, R.F., Ortega, L., Bigelow, M., DeKeyser, R., Ellis, N.C., Lantolf, J.P., Mackey, A., & Talmy, S. (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 361–421.
Jackson, D.O. (2014). The relative contribution of input modification, learner awareness, and individual differences to second language construction learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
Kempe, V., Brooks, P.J., & Kharkhurin, A. (2010). Cognitive predictors of generalization of Russian grammatical gender categories. Language Learning, 60, 127–153.
Leow, R.P., & Hama, M.K. (2013). Implicit learning in SLA and the issue of internal validity: A response to Leung and Williams’ ‘The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually derived meanings’. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 545–557.
Leung, J. (2007). Implicit learning of form-meaning connections. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Cambridge.
Leung, J.H.C., & Williams, J.N. (2011). The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually derived meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(1), 33–55.
. (2012). Constraints on implicit learning of grammatical form-meaning connections. Language Learning, 62(2), 634–662.
. (2014). Crosslinguistic differences in implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 733–755.
Macmillan, N., & Creelman, C. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Martin, C.D., Dering, B., Thomas, E.M., & Thierry, G. (2009). Brain potentials reveal semantic priming in both the 'active' and the 'non-attended' language of early bilinguals. Neuroimage, 47, 326–333.
MacWhinney, B. (1983). Miniature linguistic systems as tests of the use of universal operating principles in second-language learning by children and adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 467–478.
McLaughlin, B. (1980). On the use of miniature artificial languages in second-language research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1(4), 357–69.
Moeser, S.D., & Bregman, A.S. (1972). The role of reference in the acquisition of a miniature artificial language. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 759–769.
Morgan-Short, K. (2007). A neurolinguistic investigation of late-learned second language: Effects of explicit and implicit conditions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University.
Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Brill-Schuetz, K.A., Carpenter, H., & Wong, P. (2014). Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 56–72.
Oswald, F.L., & Plonsky, L. (2010). Meta-analysis in second language research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 85–110.
Paciorek, A. (2012). Implicit learning of semantic preferences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Cambridge.
Reber, A.S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. London: Clarendon Press.
Rebuschat, P. (2008). Implicit learning of natural language syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Cambridge.
. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63(3), 595–626.
Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Sachs, R., Riestenberg, K., & Ziegler, N. (2013). Implicit and explicit knowledge of form-meaning connections: Evidence from subjective measures of awareness. In J. Bergsleithner, S. Frota, & J.K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing: L2 studies and essays in honor of Dick Schmidt (pp. 255–275). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Sachs, R., Riestenberg, K., Sachs, R., & Ziegler, N. (2015). Triangulating measures of awareness: A contribution to the debate on learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 299–334.
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J.N. (2006). Dissociating implicit and explicit learning of natural language syntax. In R. Sun. & N. Miyake. (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2594). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
. (2009). Implicit learning of word order. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 425–430). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 829–856.
Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 223–247.
. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfeld and Hernstadt, 1991. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2005). Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength, and frequency effects in implicit artificial grammar and incidental L2 learning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991) and Knowlton and Squire (1996) and their relevance for SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 235–268.
. (2010). Implicit artificial grammar and incidental natural second language learning: How comparable are they?. Language Learning, 60 (supp. 2), 245–63.
Rogers, J. (in prep). Developing implicit and explicit knowledge of L2 case-marking under incidental learning conditions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. UCL Institute of Education, University College London.
Rogers, J., Révész, A., & Rebuschat, P. (in press). Implicit and explicit knowledge of L2 inflectional morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165–209). London: Academic Press.
Segal, E.M., & Halwes, T.G. (1965). Learning of letter pairs as a prototype of first language learning. Psychonomic Science, 3(1), 451–452.
. (1966). The influence of frequency of exposure on the learning of a phrase structural grammar. Psychonomic Science, 4(1), 157–158.
Serafini, E. (2013). Cognitive and psychological factors in the long-term development of implicit and explicit second language knowledge in adult learners of Spanish at increasing proficiency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University.
Smith, K.H. (1966). Grammatical intrusions in the recall of structured letter pairs: Mediated transfer or position learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 580–588.
Tagarelli, K.M. (2014). The neurocognition of adult second language acquisition: An fMRI study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University.
Tagarelli, K., Borges Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2011). The role of working memory in the implicit and explicit learning of languages. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2061–2066). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
. (2015). Working memory, learning context, and the acquisition of L2 syntax. In W. Zhisheng, M. Borges Mota., & A. McNeill. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: Theory, research and commentary. (pp. 224–247). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Tagarelli, K.M., Jiang, X., Laka, I., Barbey, A.K., Morgan-Short, K., Ullman, M.T. (2014, March). Examining the trajectory of language acquisition with a mini-language model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AAAL Annual Conference. Portland, Oregon.
Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2013). Metalinguistic awareness in children with differing language learning experience. In L. Roberts, A. Ewert, M. Pawlak, & M. Wrembel (Eds.), EuroSLA Yearbook, 13, 81–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thierry, G., & Wu, Y.J. (2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscous translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 104(30), 12530–12535.
Williams, J.N. (2004). Implicit learning of form-meaning connections. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 203–218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
William, J.N. (2010). Initial incidental acquisition of word order regularities: Is it just sequence learning?. Language Learning, 60(supp. 2), 221–244.
Williams, J.N., & Kuribara, C. (2008). Comparing a nativist and emergentist approach to the initial stage of SLA: An investigation of Japanese scrambling. Lingua, 118(4), 522–553.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Kachinske, Ilina & Robert DeKeyser
Tereci, Abdullah & Nazan Sezen Yüksel
Li, Ping & Qihui Xu
Ishikawa, Keiichi
Hamrick, Phillip & Rebecca Sachs
Mueller, Charles M
Kerz, Elma, Daniel Wiechmann & Florian B. Riedel
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
