In:Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change
Edited by Evie Coussé and Ferdinand von Mengden
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 69] 2014
► pp. 83–116
From inferential to mirative
An interaction-based account of an emerging semantic extension
Published online: 10 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.69.04gip
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.69.04gip
In Yurakaré (isolate, Bolivia), the inferential evidential =tiba has a secondary use in a mirative construction marking unexpected information. This paper proposes that the synchronic interactional uses of =tiba plausibly reflect a diachronic process, namely an emerging semantic extension from inferential to mirative. It is argued that interactional structure is the driving force behind this semantic extension of =tiba, which demonstrates the importance of interactional structure as a factor in language change.
References (33)
Aksu-Koç, A.A., & Slobin, D.I. (1986). A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.),
Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology
(pp. 159–167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Bisang, W. (1998). Grammaticalization and language contact, constructions and positions. In A. Giacalone Ramat, & P.J. Hopper (Eds.),
The limits of grammaticalization
(pp. 13–58). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Bybee, J. (2007).
Frequency of use and the organization of language
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994).
The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DeLancey, S. (1997). Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information.
Linguistic Typology
, 1, 33–52.
Diewald, G. (2002). A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.),
New reflections on grammaticalization
(pp. 103–120). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. (2008). The catalytic function of constructional restrictions in grammaticalization. In E. Verhoeven, S. Skopeteas, Y.-M. Shin, Y. Nishina, & J. Helmbrecht (Eds.),
Studies on grammaticalization
(pp. 219–239). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Faller, M.T. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
van Gijn, R., Hirtzel, V., & Gipper, S. (2006).
The Yurakaré Archive
Online language documentation, DoBeS Archive, MPI Nijmegen. [URL]
Gipper, S. (2011). Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakaré: An interactional account. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen. Nijmegen: MPI Series in Psycholinguistics.
Heine, B. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.),
New reflections on grammaticalization
(pp. 83–101). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hill, N.W. (2012). “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects.
Linguistic Typology
, 16, 389–433.
Hirtzel, V. (2010). Le maître à deux têtes: Enquête sur le rapport à soi d’une population d’Amazonie bolivienne, les Yuracaré. PhD dissertation, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.
Kemmer, S., & Barlow, M. (2000). Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In M. Barlow, & S. Kemmer (Eds.),
Usage-based models of language
( pp. vii–xxviii). Stanford: CSLI.
Maynard, D.W. (1997). The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction.
Research on Language and Social Interaction
, 30, 93–130.
Moore, D. (2007). Endangered languages of lowland tropical South America. In M. Brenzinger (Ed.),
Language diversity endangered
, (pp. 29–58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Peterson, T. (2010). Examining the mirative and nonliteral uses of evidentials. In T. Peterson, & U. Sauerland (Eds.),
Evidence from evidentials
(pp. 129–159). University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.
Plungian, V.A. (2001). The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space.
Journal of Pragmatics
, 33, 349–357.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.
Language
, 50, 696–735.
Schegloff, E.A. (2007).
Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in Conversation Analysis
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, T. (2005). Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position.
Research on Language and Social Interaction
, 38, 131–158.
Traugott, E.C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change.
Language
, 65, 31–55.
. (2003). Constructions in grammaticalization. In B.D. Joseph, & R.D. Janda (Eds.),
The handbook of historical linguistics
(pp. 624–647). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Traugott, E.C., & Dasher, R.B. (2002).
Regularity in semantic change
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E.C., & König, E. (1991). The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E.C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.),
Approaches to grammaticalization
Vol. I, (pp. 189–218), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Willett, T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality.
Studies in Language
, 12, 51–97.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Álvarez, Carlos G., Felipe Torres Morales, Laura C. Culcay & Javiera Amapola Bascuñán Vidal
Serrano-Losada, Mario
2017. On Englishturn outand Spanishresultarmirative constructions. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2 ► pp. 160 ff.
Serrano-Losada, Mario
Gipper, Sonja
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
