Cover not available

In:Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68] 2014
► pp. 205–228

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Interfacing the lexicon and an ontology in a linking system

 | Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany & University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, USA
 | UNED, Spain
Published online: 22 July 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.68.09val
The aim of this paper is to discuss the repercussions of a conceptual orientation on two crucial parts of the Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) linking algorithm, that is, semantic representation and constructional schemas. Firstly, it is argued that adopting FunGramKB’s notion of conceptual logical structure (CLS) over standard RRG logical structures (LSs) has numerous advantages since meaning has now access to conceptual knowledge and therefore a CLS provides a format that goes beyond those aspects that are syntactically visible. The second part introduces the notion of the grammaticon, the component where constructional schemas actually reside. RRG constructional schemas are analyzed within a conceptual framework like that provided in FunGramKB. In essence, it is shown that a conceptual orientation to the RRG linking system by the addition of CLSs enriches the semantic representations in it substantially.
References (25)
Corcho, O., Fernández, M. & Gómez, A. (2001). Technical roadmap v. 1.0 ,IST-OntoWeb Project, Madrid, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foley, W.A., & Van Valin, R.D., Jr. (1977). On the viability of the notion of ‘subject’ in universal grammar. Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society,293–320.
Mairal, R. (in preparation). Cultural distinctiveness and conceptual modelling.
Mairal, R., & Faber, P. (2002). Functional Grammar and lexical templates. In R. Mairal and M.J. Pérez Quintero (Eds.),New perspectives on predicate argument structure in Functional Grammar (pp. 41–98). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mairal, R., & Periñán, C. (2009). The anatomy of the lexicon component within the framework of a conceptual knowledge base. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada , 22, 217–244.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Teoría lingüística y representación del conocimiento: Una discusión preliminar. InD. García Padrón, & M.C. Fumero Pérez (Eds.), Tendencias en lingüística general y aplicada (pp. 155–168). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mairal, R., Periñán, C., & Pérez Cabello de Alba, M.B. (2012). La representación léxica. Hacia un enfoque ontológico. In R. Mairal, L. Guerrero, & C. González (Eds.), El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia. Introducción, avances y aplicaciones (pp. 85–102). Akal: Madrid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mairal, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. (2008). New challenges for lexical representation within the Lexical-Constructional Model (LCM). Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses , 57, 137–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Periñán, C. (2013). Towards a model of constructional meaning for natural language understanding. InB. Nolan, & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.) Linking constructions into Functional Linguistics (pp. 205–230). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Periñán, C., & Arcas, F. (2007). Cognitive modules of an NLP knowledge base for language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natura l, 39, 197–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). The architecture of FunGramKB. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation,2667–2674.
Periñán, C., & Mairal, R. (2009). Bringing Role and Reference Grammar to natural language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natura l, 43, 265–273.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). La Gramática de COREL: un lenguaje de representación conceptual. Onomazein , 21, 11–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). The coherent methodology in FunGramKB. Onomazein , 24, 13–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). La dimensión computacional de la Gramática del Papel y la Referencia: La estructura lógica conceptual y su aplicación en el procesamiento del lenguaje natural. In R. Mairal, L. Guerrero, & C. González (Eds.), El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia. Introducción, avances y aplicaciones (pp. 333–348). Akal: Madrid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon . Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, R.D., Jr. (1981). Grammatical relations in ergative languages. Studies in Language , 5, 361–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). Generalized semantic roles and the syntax-semantics interface. In F. Corblin, C. Dobrovie-Sorin, & J.M. Marandin (Eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 2 (pp. 373–389). The Hague: Thesus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Semantic macroroles in Role and Reference Grammar. In R. ­Kailuweit, & Martin Hummel (Eds.), Semantische rollen (pp. 62–82). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Semantic macroroles and language processing. In I. Bornkessel, M. Schlesewsky, B. Comrie, & A. Friederici (Eds.), Semantic role universals and argument linking: Theoretical, typological and psycho-/neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 263–302). ­Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Privileged syntactic arguments, pivots and controllers. InL. ­Guerrero, S. Ibáñez, & V.A. Belloro (Eds), Studies in Role and Reference Grammar (pp. 45–68). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Lexical representation, co-composition, and linking syntax and semantics. In J. Pustejovsky, P. Bouillon, H. Isahara, K. Kanzaki, & C. Lee (Eds.), Advances in generative lexicon theory (pp. 67–107). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, R.D., Jr., & LaPolla, R.J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, R.D. Jr., & Wilkins, D. (1993). Predicting syntax from semantics. In R.D. Van Valin, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar (pp. 499–534). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Cortés-Rodríguez, Francisco J. & Ana Díaz-Galán
2023. The lexical constructional model meets syntax: guidelines of the formalized lexical-constructional model (FL_CxG ). Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 18 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Cortés-Rodríguez, Francisco José
2016. Towards the computational implementation of Role and Reference Grammar: Rules for the syntactic parsing of RRG Phrasal constituents. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 65 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Mairal-Usón, Ricardo
2015. Constructional meaning representation within a knowledge engineering framework. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue