In:Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68] 2014
► pp. 33–52
Giving it my best shot
Towards a coherent functional analysis of metaphorically-derived processes with particular attention to the ‘light verb’ expressions
Published online: 22 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.68.02tuc
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.68.02tuc
In this article I explore the extent to which the analysis of metaphoricallyderivedexpressions, such as “give someone a hug”, differs from that assigned tothe prototypical sense associated with the main verb in question. Taking expressionsinvolving the verb “give”, I consider a range of semantic departures fromprototypical “give”, in respect of the process type (material, mental, relationalprocess etc.) and the participant roles present. Using a Systemic FunctionalGrammar framework, I analyse candidate expressions according to their lexicogrammaticalpotential (e.g. associated syntactic alternation potential) and aset of tests to establish the participant roles present. The results of the analysisindicate a cline of differing degrees of lexicogrammatical departure from theprototype, reflecting their respective semantic departure.
References (20)
Aston, G., & B.L. (1998).
The BNC handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA
. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Butler, C. (2001). “A matter of GIVE and TAKE: Corpus linguistics and the predicate frame.” In María Jesús Pérez Quintero (Ed.),
Challenges and developments in Functional Grammar. Monographic section of Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 42
, 55–78.
Fawcett, R.P. (1987). The semantics of clause and verb for relational processes in English. In M.A.K. Halliday, & R.P. Fawcett (Eds.),
New developments in systemic linguistics, Vol 1: Theory and description
(pp. 130–183). London: Frances Pinter.
. (2000).
A theory of syntax for systemic functional linguistics
. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2011). Problems and solutions in identifying processes and participant roles in discourse analysis. Part 1: Introduction to a systematic procedure for identifying processes and participant poles. In
Annual Review of Functional Linguistics
, 3, 34–87.
Fawcett, R.P., Tucker, G.H., & Lin, Y. (1993). How a systemic functional grammar works; the role of realization in realization. In H. Horacek, & M. Zock (Eds.),
New concepts in natural language generation: planning realization and systems
(pp. 114–186). London: Pinter.
Grady, J. (1998). The conduit metaphor revisited: A reassessment of metaphors for mental processes. In J.P. Koenig (Ed.),
Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap
(pp. 1–16). Stanford: CSLI.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004).
An introduction to Functional Grammar
. 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P., & Tugwell, D. (2004). The sketch Engine. In
Proc EURALEX 2004
(pp. 105–116). Lorient, France. Also at ([URL]).
Levin B. (1993).
English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation
. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
O’Donnell, M., Zappavigna, M., & Whitelaw, C. (2009). A survey of process type classification over difficult cases. In C. Jones, & E. Ventola (Eds.),
New developments in the study of ideational meaning: From language to multimodality
(pp. 47–64). London: Continuum.
Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor. InA. Ortony (Ed.),
Metaphor and thought
(pp. 284–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J.R. (1969).
Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Siewierska. A., & Hollmann, W. (2007). Ditransitive clauses in English with special reference to Lancashire dialect. In M. Hannay, & G.J. Steen (Eds.),
Structural-functional studies in English grammar
(pp. 83–102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
