In:Advances in Functional Linguistics: Columbia School beyond its origins
Edited by Joseph Davis, Radmila J. Gorup and Nancy Stern
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 57] 2006
► pp. 263–281
Structuring cues of conjunctive yet, but, and still
A monosemic approach
Published online: 20 December 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.57.19cru
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.57.19cru
This study examines over 400 tokens of conjunctive yet, but, and still to confirm predictions tied to a unique structuring cue or meaning posited for each form (Crupi 2004). The research is conducted within a Columbia School sign-based linguistic framework; however, unlike forms typically examined in CS analyses, yet, but, and still do not comprise a closed grammatical system. Rather the three are independent linguistic units that share the common communicative function of adversative conjunction. By examining the flow of information through a text, this research indicates that conjunctive yet, but, and still contribute unique and consistent clues about overall textual structure.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Even-Simkin, Elena
Xiang, Xuehua
2019. A comparative study of the restrictive markings of mandarin Jiù, Cái, and
Zhǐ
. In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77], ► pp. 259 ff.
Ranger, Graham
Ranger, Graham
Davis, Joseph
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
