Cover not available

In:Romeo and Juliet in European Culture
Edited by Juan F. Cerdá, Dirk Delabastita and Keith Gregor
[Shakespeare in European Culture 1] 2017
► pp. 197–226

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
“Unveiling” Romeo and Juliet in Spain

Translation, performance and censorship

 | University of León
Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sec.1.11ban
Abstract
This paper surveys the reception of Romeo and Juliet in Franco’s Spain by showing the evolution of the tragedy on the Spanish stages. Thanks to the censorship material kept at the Archivo General de la Administración, I have carried out an analysis of different productions that reveals that Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is not a stable entity but a web of translations, adaptations and appropriations reflecting the political, social and cultural forces at work at the time. Besides, this work brings to light how the performance of the play evolved from a poetic and chaste love story during the first years of the dictatorship to a more sexual and tasteless comedy framed in the context of the destape (unveiling) period, thus entering the realm of lowbrow culture and becoming a Shakespop product.
Article outline
  • A poetic and chaste love story in the eyes of Francoism
  • “What’s in a name?” Just a name, only a name …
  • The tragedy becomes a comedy
  • And then came the destape
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (23)
References
Alonso Tejada, Luis. 1977. La represión sexual en la España de Franco. Madrid: Caralt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Álvarez Chillida, Gonzalo. 1996. José María Pemán, pensamiento y trayectoria de un monárquico (1897–1941). Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Da Cunha Resende, Aimara. 2005. “Text, Context, and Audience: Two Versions of Romeo and Juliet in Brazilian Popular Culture.” In Kliman and Santos 2005, 270–289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Paco, Mariano. 1989. “El grupo ‘Arte Nuevo’ y el teatro español de postguerra.” Estudios Románicos 5: 1.065–1.078.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desmet, Christy. 2014. “Recognizing Shakespeare, Rethinking Fidelity: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Appropriation.” In Huang and Rivlin 2014, 41–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desmet, Christy, and Sawyer, Robert, eds. 1999. Shakespeare and Appropriation. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischlin, Daniel, and Mark Fortier, eds. 2000. Adaptations of Shakespeare. A Critical Anthology of Plays from the Seventeenth Century to the Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gregor, Keith. 2010. Shakespeare in the Spanish Theatre: 1772 to the Present. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Alexa, and Elizabeth Rivlin, eds. 2014. Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. 2006. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidnie, Margaret Jane. 2009. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kliman, Bernice W., and Rick J. Santos, eds. 2005. Latin American Shakespeares. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lanier, Douglas. 2002. Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Shakespearean Rhizomatics: Adaptation, Ethics, Value.” In Huang and Rivlin 2014, 21–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney. 2010. Screen Adaptations: Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llera, José Antonio. 2003. El humor verbal y visual de “La Codorniz.” Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Modenessi, Alfredo Michel. 2005. “Cantinflas’s Romeo and Juliet: The Rogue and Will.” In Kliman and Santos 2005, 219–241.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connor, John. 2003. Shakespearean Afterlives. Ten Characters with a Life of their Own. Cambridge: Iconbooks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pemán, José María. 1935. Julieta y Romeo. Comedieta en prosa. Madrid: Juan Manuel Monte.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Racz, Gregary J. 2005. “Strategies of Deletion in Pablo Neruda’s Romeo and Juliet .” In Kliman and Santos 2005, 71–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Julie. 2006. Adaptation and Appropriation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Nebrera, Gregorio. 2010. “ Romeo y Julieta a la española: Lope, Rojas Zorrilla y otros autores.” Anuario de Estudios Filológicos XXXIII: 361–383.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Rayner, Francesca
2021. The story of what might have been: Interrogating Romeo and Juliet under the Portuguese dictatorship. Sederi :31 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue