In:Pivotal Constructions in Chinese: Diachronic, synchronic, and constructional perspectives
Rui Peng
[Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse 8] 2017
► pp. 107–154
Chapter 5The diachronic developments of Chinese pivotal constructions
Published online: 21 March 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.8.c5
https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.8.c5
Article outline
- 5.1Introduction
- 5.1.1Methodology
- 5.1.2The historical periods for which data are examined
- 5.2The history of the manipulative pivotal construction
- 5.2.1The 17th–11th centuries bc
- 5.2.2The 10th–7th centuries bc
- 5.2.3The 6th–3rd centuries bc
- 5.2.4The 2nd century bc–2nd century ad
- 5.2.5The 3rd–6th centuries ad
- 5.2.6The 7th–12th centuries ad
- 5.2.7The 13th–17th centuries ad
- 5.2.8A summary of the historical periods in which the primary types of the manipulative pivotal construction appeared
- 5.3The history of the cause-complement pivotal construction
-
5.3.1The emergence of the cause-complement pivotal construction
- 5.3.1.1The parallelism between v 1[nv 2] and v 1[N zhi v 2]
- 5.3.1.2The appearance of the hypotactic v emo nv 2
- 5.3.1.3The emergence of a hypotactic v jud nv 2
- 5.3.2The further development of the cause-complement pivotal construction
- 5.3.2.1The 7th–14th centuries ad
- 5.3.2.2The 15th–18th centuries ad
- 5.3.2.3After the 19th century ad
- 5.3.3A summary of the historical periods in which the primary types of the cause-complement pivotal construction appeared
-
5.3.1The emergence of the cause-complement pivotal construction
- 5.4The history of the descriptive pivotal construction
- ?????????5.4.1Before the 5th century bc
- 5.4.2The 5th century bc–1st century ad
- 5.4.3The 7th–14th centuries ad
- 5.4.4The 15th–19th centuries ad
- 5.4.5After the 19th century ad
- 5.4.6A summary of the historical periods in which the primary types of the cause-complement pivotal construction appeared
- 5.5The expansion of the pivotal constructions with respect to the main semantic-pragmatic properties
Notes
