In:Increased Empiricism: Recent advances in Chinese Linguistics
Edited by Zhuo Jing-Schmidt
[Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse 2] 2013
► pp. 101–126
Classifier choices in discourse across the seven main Chinese dialects
Published online: 18 December 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.2.05erb
https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.2.05erb
Discourse activates classifiers. No classifier, either general or sortal (e.g. CLF:elongated 條 tiao), appears with 44% of Mandarin nouns in descriptions of Chafe’s Pear Stories film (Shanghai Wu 44%, Cantonese 37%). Classifiers only appear for highlighting. General classifiers dominate (53% Mandarin nouns, Shanghai 45%, Cantonese 45%). Only general classifiers appear in 40% of Mandarin stories (Shanghai 0%, Cantonese 3%). Sortals are infrequent: 3% of Mandarin nouns (Shanghai 11%, Cantonese 18%). Speakers name the same nouns, but sortals vary. Synonymous sortals (“bicycle” 架 jia CLF:frame/部 bu CLF:machine), form 26% of Mandarin sortals (Shanghai 9%, Cantonese 30%). No sortal listed in dialect dictionaries denotes a superordinate category (e.g. “animal”); 75% differ from Mandarin; 18% have no Mandarin cognate.
Keywords: Chinese dialects, classifier choice, discourse
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Huang, Qi & Walter Bisang
Frankowsky, Maximilian, Dan Ke, Pienie Zwitserlood, René Michel & Jens Bölte
Shi, Heidi H. & Zhuo Jing-Schmidt
2020. Little cutie one piece. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 11:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Erbaugh, Mary S.
2019. How the Chinese language encourages the paradigm shift toward discourse in linguistics. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 10:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
