Cover not available

In:Analysing Chinese Language and Discourse across Layers and Genres
Edited by Wei Wang
[Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse 13] 2020
► pp. 119–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
Understanding stancetaking through gestures and linguistic practices in a public political debate in Hong Kong

 | University of California, Los Angeles
Published online: 28 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.13.07wan
Abstract
Hong Kong has enjoyed partial universal suffrage in both District Council election as well as the Legislative Council election since the handover in 1997. This paper looks into the 2016 Hong Kong Legislative Council electoral debate with the combination of discourse analysis using the Stance Triangle (Du Bois 2007) and gesture-unit analysis (Kendon 2004) to study how verbal and non-verbal activities are being strategically organized to project both affective and epistemic stances by the elected incumbent, Alvin Yeung, and his opponents. The findings suggest Cantonese utterance final particles and gestures are strategically and aptly employed to achieve both expressive and communicative purposes in the political debates where they can not only elucidate their policy agenda but also defeat the opponents and win the votes.
Article outline
  • Background of the study
  • Methodology
    • Gesture analysis
      • The status of gestures in human interaction
      • Gesture units, gesture phrases, the phases of gestural action
    • Stancetaking and the stance triangle
      • The stance triangle
      • Affective and epistemic stances
    • Data
  • Findings
    • Individual Speech
    • Analyzing the individual speech with the Stance Triangle
    • Interim summary for stancetaking in individual speech
    • The debate between Alvin Yeung and Holden Chow
    • Analyzing the debate with the Stance Triangle
    • Interim summary for the debate
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (28)
References
Biber, D., and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect.” Text & Talk 9 (1): 94–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheung, H. N. 2007. Cantonese as Spoken in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul A., and Christina Schaffner. 2002. Politics as text and talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chor, Winnie. 2014. Epistemic Modulations and Speakers Stance in Cantonese Conversations.” The 45th ALS Conference Proceedings, ed. by Mark Harvey, and Alexis Antonia, 104–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Sentence final particles as epistemic modulators in Cantonese conversations: A discourse-pragmatic perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics, 129: 34–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 2011. “Questioning Candidates.” In Talking Politics in the Broadcast Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and Accountability, ed. by Mats Ekstrom, and Marianna Patrona, 15–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., Marc N. Elliott, John Heritage, and Megan K. Beckett. 2012. “The President’s Questioners: Consequential Attributes of the White House Press Corps.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 12: 100–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2007. “Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The stance triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2007. “The role of I guess in conversational stancetaking.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 183–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Law, S. P. 1990. The Syntax and Phonology of Cantonese Sentence-final Particles. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Law, Yan Kei Ann. 2004. Sentence-final focus particles in Cantonese. London: University of London, University College London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leung, C. S. 2005. A Study of the Utterance Particles in Cantonese as Spoken in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Language Information Sciences Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leung, W. M. 2010. On the Synchrony and Diachrony of Sentence-final Particles: the case of ‘wo’ in Cantonese. Saarbrucken, Germany: Lambert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen. 1997. Evidentiality and Mirativity in Cantonese: wo3, wo4, wo5! (unpublished)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen and Virginia Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montgomery, Martin. 2007. The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “The discourse of the broadcast news interview.” Journalism Studies, 9 (2): 260–277.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 2002. “Home position.” Gesture, 2 (2): 133–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2000. “Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language in Society, 29 (1): 1–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Bernhard Forchtner. 2017. “The fictionalisation of politics.” in The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Bernhard Forchtner. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Jiao Wang and Charles Lam. 2010. “Stance Phenomena in Chinese: diachronic, discourse, and processing perspective (Special Issue).” Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 8(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yau, S. C. 1980. Sentential connotations in Cantonese. Fangyan, 1, 35–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue