Cover not available

In:Current Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse: Global context and diverse perspectives
Edited by Yun Xiao and Linda Tsung
[Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse 10] 2019
► pp. 199–219

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 10
Kinship metaphors in the Chinese construction A shi B zhi fu/mu

Biology and culture as conceptual basis

 | University of Oregon
Published online: 15 April 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.10.10zhu
Abstract
This corpus-driven study focuses on two metaphorically used kinship terms in Modern Chinese, 父 fu ‘father’ and 母 mu ‘mother’. Under investigation are two constructions [A shi B zhi fu] ‘A is the father of B’ and [A shi B zhi mu] ‘A is the mother of B’. It is found that the figurative meanings expressed by mu (mother) are more conventionalized than those expressed by fu. The study shows that mu has higher metaphoricity, and I argue that the degree of metaphoricity of the two kinship terms in Chinese is a function both of the experiential basis of cognition in terms of universal biological phenomenon and of cultural constraints, especially Confucian thoughts, on conceptualization.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data for analysis
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Metaphor identification
    • 3.2Statistical procedure
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Research object and A has [+human]
    • 4.2Research object and B has [+human]
    • 4.3Research object and A has [+specific]
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (37)
References
Alverson, Hoyt. 1991. “Metaphor and Experience: Looking over the Notion of Image Schema.” In Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology, 94–117. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, Joanne. 2007. Mencius and Masculinities: Dynamics of Power, Morality, and Maternal Thinking. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum, Susan D. 1997. “Naming Practices and the Power of Words in China.” Language in Society 26 (3): 357–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2002. Semiotics: The Basics. London ; New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Institute of Languages Dictionary Editorial Room. 2013. 现代汉语词典 [The Contemporary Chinese Dictionary]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Commercial Press, The. 辞源 [The Etymology]. 2007. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, A. 2012. Semantics. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, Daniel. 2014. Confucianism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan. 2015. “Polysemy.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Vol. 39, ed. by Dąbrowska, Ewa, and Dagmar Divjak. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiraga, Masako K. 2005. Metaphor and Iconicity: A Cognitive Approach to Analysing Texts. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2008. “Much Mouth Much Tongue: Chinese Metonymies and Metaphors of Verbal Behaviour.” Cognitive Linguistics 19 (2): 241–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Yutang. 2000. 吾国与吾民 [Wǔguó Yǔ Wǔmín]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matisoff, James. 1991. “The Mother of All Morphemes: Augmentatives and Diminutives in Areal and Universal Perspective.” In The First Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mercurio, Deo. ‘Tales of Ritona’, 2016. [URL].
Quinn, Naomi. 1991. “The Cultural Basis of Metaphor.” In Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology, edited by James W. Fernandez, 56–93. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, Naomi, and Dorothy Holland. 1987. “Culture and Cognition.” In Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seitz, Jay A. 2005. “The Neural, Evolutionary, Developmental, and Bodily Basis of Metaphor.” New Ideas in Psychology 23 (2): 74–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard B. 2011. Metaphor in Language and Thought: How Do We Map the Field? In Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion edited by Mario Brdar, Stefan Th. Gries, and Milena Žic Fuchs, 67–86. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarasti, Eero. 2016. “Metaphors, semiotics and futures studies”. Futures 84: 120–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
To, Siu-Ming. 2015. “Development and Validation of a Quantitative Measure for Chinese Sources of Parental Meaning”. Journal of Child and Families Studies 24: 3580–3594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 1987. Death Is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wee, L. 2006. “The Cultural Basis of Metaphor Revisited.” Pragmatics & Cognition 14 (1): 111–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. 3rd ed. Translated by G. E. M. (Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret) Anscombe. Oxford UK; Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2001.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Ning. 2007. “The Chinese Conceptualization of the Heart and Its Cultural Context: Implications for Second Language Learning.” In Applied Cultural Linguistics: Implications for Second Language Learning and Intercultural Communication, ed. by Farzad Sharifian and Gary Palmer, 65–85. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Metaphor, Body, and Culture: The Chinese Understanding of Gallbladder and Courage.” Metaphor and Symbol 18 (1). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: 13–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Beijing Olympics and Beijing Opera: A Multimodal Metaphor in a CCTV Olympics Commercial.” Cognitive Linguistics 22 (3): 595–628. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yue, Wenhui. 2012. “义素及义素分析方法浅谈 [Semantic Component and Semantic Component Analysis: A Brief Introduction].” Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition), Special Issue For Graduate Students 37: 84–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, George. 2014. The Study of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue