In:Corpus Approaches to Social Media:
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Daria Dayter
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 98] 2020
► pp. 131–146
Chapter 6Double trouble
Are 280-character tweets comparable to 140-character tweets?
Published online: 4 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.98.06ebe
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.98.06ebe
Abstract
Linguistic data from social media is often discussed in the light of constraints, be it due to character limits or the putatively short attention span of users. In November 2017, Twitter eased one such constraint, increasing the maximum length of tweets from 140 to 280 characters. The present longitudinal study shows that this change has had an effect on the linguistic surface structure of tweets, especially in regard to optional syntactical and metatextual features. I discuss the origin and nature of these changes and their relation to hard constraints of social media platforms in addition to highlighting the impact on methodological aspects of future longitudinal studies of Twitter data which may cover periods both before and after the switch.
Keywords: Twitter, social media, character limit, constraint, variation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodology
- 3.Results
- 3.1Lexical variation
- 3.2Variation in punctuation
- 3.3Metatextual variation
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
- 4.1Theoretical implications
- 4.2Methodological implications
Notes References
References (15)
Bieswanger, Markus. 2013. Micro-linguistic structural features of computer-mediated communication. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication [Handbooks of Pragmatics 9], Susan Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds), 463–486. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Caruso, Assunta, Folino, Antonietta, Parisi, Francesca & Trunfio, Roberto. 2014. A statistical method for minimum corpus size determination. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis (JADT 2014), Emilie Née (ed.), 135–146. <[URL]> (23 February 2020).
Clement, Jessica. 2019. Most famous social network sites 2019, by active users. Statista. March 2019. <[URL]> (27 March 2019).
Dorsey, Jack. 2017. Twitter post (untitled). Twitter. 26 September 2017. <[URL]> (23 February 2020).
Gligorić, Kristina, Anderson, Ashton & West, Robert. 2018. arXiv.org, 6 April 2018. How constraints affect content: The case of Twitter’s switch from 140 to 280 characters. <[URL]> (23 February 2020).
Hu, Yuheng, Talamadupula, Kartik & Kambhampati, Subbarao. 2013. Dude, srsly? The surprisingly formal nature of Twitter’s language. In Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 8–11 July 2013, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, Emre Kiciman (ed.), 244–253. Palo Alto CA: AAAI Press.
Joyce, Caneel K. 2009. The Blank Page: Effects of Constraint on Creativity. PhD dissertation, London School of Economics.
Mayikama, Koji. 2016. magicfor: Magic functions to obtain results from for loops. 18 December 2016. CRAN. <[URL]> (23 February 2020).
Rambukanna, Nathan. 2015. From #racefail to #ferguson: The digital intimacies of race-activist hashtag publics. In The Fibreculture Journal, Pip Shea, Tanya Notley, Jean Burgess & Su Ballard (eds), 150–188. Sydney, Australia: Fibreculture Journal, Open Humanities Press.
Schnoebelen, Tyler. 2012. Do you smile with your nose: Stylistic variation in Twitter emoticons. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2): Article 14. <[URL]> (23 February 2020).
Tatman, Rachael & Paullada, Amandalynne. 2017. Social identity and punctuation variation in the #BlueLivesMatter and #BlackLivesMatter Twitter communities. <[URL]> (23 February 2020).
Tidyverse Team. 2019. tidyverse: An opinionated collection of R packages designed for data science. GITHUB. <[URL]> (23 February 2020).
twintproject. 2019. twint: Open-source Twitter intelligence. GITHUB, <[URL]> (23 February 2020).
Wickham, Hadley. 2019. stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrapper for Common String Operations. 10 February 2019. CRAN. <[URL]> (23 February 2020).
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
HONKAPOHJA, ALPO & IMOGEN MARCUS
Sluchinski, Kerry
2024.
Ta as an emergent language practice of audience design in CMC. Narrative Inquiry 34:1 ► pp. 78 ff.
Liimatta, Aatu
2023. Register variation across text lengths. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
Neumeier, Lisza-Sophie
Biri, Ylva
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.