Cover not available

In:Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts: In honor of Merja Kytö
Edited by Ewa Jonsson and Tove Larsson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 97] 2020
► pp. 207–226

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 13
Explaining explanatory so

 | University of Manchester
Published online: 5 October 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.97.13den
This chapter examines a recent use of so in spoken British English, namely as a discourse marker conveying acceptance of an invitation to take the floor and give an explanation. I demonstrate a long-term increase in turn-initial so, dating the specifically ‘explanatory so’ to the 2010s in Britain. Evidence comes from corpora of academic discourse, of media language and especially of conversation. I argue that the usage is a coalescence of several well-attested discourse uses of so, perhaps strengthened by transatlantic influence. I explain the often hostile public reaction by the sentence grammar of so, also offering a general hypothesis about what makes an innovation salient and objectionable to conservative speakers.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. So in sentence grammar
  • 3. So as discourse marker
  • 4.Corpus data
    • 4.1Conversation: Spoken BNC1994DS and Spoken BNC2014
    • 4.2Academic speech: BASE
    • 4.3Broadcasting
  • 5.Origins of explanatory so
  • 6.Public reaction to explanatory so
  • 7.Envoi
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
References (29)
References
anon. 2017. So what? Well, it’s time to brush up (and vary) your verbal tics. The Times, 15 November 2017. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blevins, M. 2015. So, when did we start introducing sentences with so? Today I found out: Feed your brain. <[URL]> (15 May 2020).
BNC. 2007. The British National Corpus, version 3, BNC XML edn. Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolden, G. B. 2003a. Self and the other: The use of “oh” and “so” in sequence-initial position. Paper presented at Annual Conference on Language, Interaction, and Social Organization, Santa Barbara CA.
2003b. The use of “so” and “oh” in sequence-initial position. Paper presented at Annual Conference of the National Communication Association, Miami FL.
2008. “So what’s up?”: Using the discourse marker so to launch conversational business [Jul–Sep]. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3): 302–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 41(5): 974–998. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J. 2006. Pathways in the development of pragmatic markers in English. In The Handbook of the History of English, A. van Kemenade & B. Los (eds), 307–334. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buysse, L. 2012. So as a multifunctional discourse marker in native and learner speech. Journal of Pragmatics 44(13): 1764–1782. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creighton, S. 2015. SO wrong! Why John Humphrys is in a rage at such a little word after it invades everyday speech. Mail Online, 20 June 2015. <[URL]> (30 March 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. 2019. TV Corpus. 325 Million Words, 1950–2018. Brigham Young University. <[URL]> (15 May 2020)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, K. 2017. Feedback, presented by Roger Bolton, with guest Heike Pichler. In Feedback podcast, BBC Radio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. 2018. On prefixes. In A Point of View, BBC Radio 4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Evert, S., Lehmann, H.-M. & Schneider, P. 1996–2010. BNCweb (CQP-Edition): A web-based interface to the British National Corpus (2009). <[URL]> (15 May 2020).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, M. 1999[2012]. The New New Thing: A Silicon Valley Story. New York NY: Norton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, M. 2010. So new? Language Log. <[URL]> (13 April 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. So. Language Log. <[URL]> (26 December 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V. & McEnery, T. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, H. & Thompson, P. 2000–2005. BASE: British Academic Spoken English. Warwick: University of Warwick.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlegl, L. 2018. Tracking Change in Canadian English Utterance-initial Discourse Markers. MA dissertation, University of Toronto.
Shariatmadari, D. 2017. So, what’s the problem with ‘so’? (15 November). The Guardian.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurman, H. 2014. How a popular two-letter word is undermining your credibility. Fast Company. <[URL]> (26 April 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. 2005. Just between Dr. Language and I. Language Log. <[URL]> (4 May 2006).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ruskan, Anna
2024. Role of six turn-initial demonstrative and emotive particles in Lithuanian. Open Linguistics 10:1 DOI logo
Berthe, Florine & Isabelle Gaudy-Campbell
2023. Délimiter la pseudo-clivée en contexte oral : le rôle de so, marqueur discursif. Discours :33 DOI logo
Wolde, Elnora ten & Thomas Schwaiger
2022. Modification as a linguistic ‘relationship’: Ajust soproblem in Functional Discourse Grammar. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 699 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue