In:Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts: In honor of Merja Kytö
Edited by Ewa Jonsson and Tove Larsson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 97] 2020
► pp. 153–172
Chapter 10Question strategies in the Old Bailey Corpus
Published online: 5 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.97.10ron
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.97.10ron
This qualitative and quantitative pilot study investigates the use of different question strategies of varying coerciveness in four different periods in the Old Bailey Corpus. It asks what question strategies are used by which trial participants at what time in the later early and late modern periods of English, using Woodbury’s (1984) continuum of control. Data stems from the Old Bailey Corpus 2.0 and is investigated manually. Results show that compared to the defendants asking questions, which was the practice in earlier periods, the legal practitioners asked more varied questions with broader scopes. These drove the discourse of the court proceedings forward more successfully than the more narrow questions asked by the defendants in the early trials under consideration.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Discourse in contemporary and earlier legal systems
- 2.1Questions in the present-day courtroom
- 2.2The situation in the Early Modern English courtroom
- 3.Data and method
- 4.Results
- 4.1Questions in the early eighteenth century
- 4.2Questions in the late eighteenth century
- 4.3Questions in the early nineteenth century
- 4.4Questions in the late nineteenth century
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgment Note References
References (10)
Archer, D. 2005. Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760): A Sociopragmatic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2010. A diachronic investigation of English courtroom practice. In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (eds), 185–198. London: Routledge.
Culpeper, J. & Kytö, M. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
Gibbons, J. 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. London: Wiley Blackwell.
Holt, E. & Johnson, A. 2010. Legal talk. Socio-pragmatic aspects of legal talk: police interviews and trial discourse. In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (eds), 21–36. London: Routledge.
Huber, M., Nissel, M. & Puga, K. 2016. Old Bailey Corpus 2.0., hdl:11858/00-246C-0000-0023-8CFB-2. <[URL]> (15 May 2019).
Newbury, P. & Johnson, A. 2006. Suspects’ resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 13(2): 213–240.
Tkačuková, T. 2010. Representing oneself. Cross-examination questioning: lay people as cross-examiners. In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (eds), 333–345. London: Routledge.
Rama-Martinez, E. 2013. Courtroom interaction between 1760–1860: On defendants taking (re)initiating moves. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14(2): 237–262.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.