Cover not available

In:Corpora and the Changing Society: Studies in the evolution of English
Edited by Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi and Juhani Klemola
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 96] 2020
► pp. 223–250

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Analyzing change in the American English amplifier system in the fiction genre

 | University of Queensland
Published online: 8 April 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.96.09sch
Abstract
This study examines the diachronic development of amplification of adjectives in American English (AmE), specifically in the fiction section of the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). The results show that amplifier use in attributive contexts remains stable, while, in predicative contexts, so has increased significantly since the 1980s and has replaced very as the dominant amplifier. This development contrasts with ongoing change in other regional varieties of English where really, rather than so, has become the dominant amplifier of adjectives during the latter half of the 20th century. The results show that so and very are semantically highly similar and that the increase in so is mostly based on its co-occurrence with good.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion and outlook
  • Notes
  • References
References (65)
References
Corpora and software
COHA = Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. <[URL]> (30 November 2018).
Corpusdata = <[URL]> (3 June 2019).
Hornik, Kurt. 2016. Package “OpenNLP” – Apache OpenNLP Tools Interface. <[URL]> (30 November 2018).
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, [URL] (30 November 2018).
Other references
Aijmer, Karin. 2011. Are you totally spy? A new intensifier in present-day American English. In Marqueurs discursifs et subjectivité, Sylvie Hancil (ed.), 155–172. Rouen: Universités de Rouen et du Havre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. That’s well bad. Some new intensifiers in spoken in British English. In Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British English, Vaclav Brezina, Robbie Love & Karin Aijmer (eds), 60–95. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. Intensification with ‘very’, ‘really’ and ‘so’ in selected varieties of English. In Corpora and Lexis, Sebastian Hoffmann, Andrea Sand, Sabine Arndt-Lappe & Lisa Marie Dillmann (eds.), 106–139. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnfield, Katie & Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2010. Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal developments and new trends. English World-Wide 31(3): 252–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Bauer, Winifred. 2002. Adjective boosters in the English of young New Zealanders. Journal of English Linguistics 30(3): 244–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 2007. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, 6th edn. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borst, Eugene. 1902. Die Gradadverbien im Englischen [Anglistische Forschungen 10]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breban, Tine & Davidse, Kristin. 2016. The history of very: the directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20(2): 221–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Arnovik, Leslie K. 2006. The English Language. A Linguistic History. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calle-Martín, Javier. 2014. On the history of the intensifier wonder in English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(3): 399–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fettig, Adolf. 1934. Die Gradadverbien im Mittelenglischen [Anglistische Forschungen 79]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert. 2016. Register variation in intensifier usage across Asian Englishes. In Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change: Insights from English, Heike Pichler (ed.), 185–213. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspectives on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1): 97–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2006. Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(2): 243–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, Rika & Tagliamonte, Sali. 2003. Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32, 257–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 2017. The comparative basis of intensification. In Exploring Intensification. Synchronic, Diachronic and Cross-linguistic Perspectives [Studies in Language Companion Series 189], Maria Napoli & Miriam Ravetto (eds), 15–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Intensity. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), 43–70. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter R. 2002. Really worthwhile or not really significant: A corpus-based approach to the delexicalisation and grammaticalisation of adverbial intensifiers in Modern English. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 143–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald. 2002. Extremely interesting, very interesting, or only quite interesting: Adverbs and social class. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(3): 398–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Pure grammaticalization: The development of a teenage intensifier. Language Variation and Change 18(3): 267–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2004. Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory. Statistics, frequencies and beyond. In Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13], Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds), 121–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2003. On intensifiers and grammaticalization: The case of swiþe. English Studies 84(4): 372–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Introduction. Special issue on English intensifiers. English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 213–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén & Pahta, Päivi. 2010. Intensifiers in competition: The picture from early English medical writing. In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds), 191–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax, Part 1: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2008. Social variation in intensifier use: Constraint on -ly adverbialization in the past? English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 289–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Rissanen, Matti. 2002. Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24: 359–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio & Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma. 2012. He’s absolutely massive. It’s a super day. Madonna, she is a wicked singer. Youth language and intensification: A corpus-based study. Text and Talk 32(6): 773–796. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of DEGREE. English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 317–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 1993. Corpus evidence of language change: The case of intensifiers. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 177–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, Hans. 1992. English boosters: Some synchronic and diachronic aspects. In Diachrony within Synchrony: Language History and Cognition, Günter Kellermann & Michael D. Morrissey (eds), 529–545. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Die englischen Gradadverbien der Kategorie booster. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 269–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rickford, John, Wasow, Thomas, Zwicky, Arnold & Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2007. Intensive and quotative all: Something old, something new. American Speech 82(1): 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 2008. From ‘quickly’ to ‘fairly’: On the history of rather. English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 345–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweinberger, Martin. 2017a. Using intensifier-adjective collocations to determine mechanisms of change. Paper presented at ICAME 38 (International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English). Prague, Czech Republic, 24–28.05.2017. <[URL]> (30 November 2018).
. 2017b. Modelling intensification in New Zealand English data. Paper presented at Methods in Dialectology XVI. Tokyo, Japan, 7–11.08.2017. <[URL]> (November 30 2018).
Stange, Ulrike. 2017. “You’re so not going to believe this”: The use of Genx so in constructions with future going to in American English. American Speech 92(4): 487–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2010. Empirical cognitive semantics: Some thoughts. In Quantitative Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven Approaches, Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer (eds), 355–380. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan T. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2): 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1): 1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1999. He was really gormless – she’s bloody crap: Girls, boys and intensifiers. In Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, Hilde Hasselgård & Signe Oksefjell (eds), 69–78. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoffel, Cornelis. 1901. Intensives and Downtoners [Anglistische Forschungen 1]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2008. So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language & Linguistics 12(2): 361–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Variationist Sociolinguistics. Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1): 58–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Denis, Derek. 2014. Expanding the transmission/diffusion dichotomy: Evidence from Canada. Language 90(1): 90–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Roberts, Chris. 2005. So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech 80(3): 280–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2007. A corpus-based investigation of absolutely and related phenomena in spoken American English. Journal of English Linguistics 35(1): 5–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, Susanne. 2017. Totally new and pretty awesome: Amplifier-adjective bigrams in GloWbE. Lingua 200: 63–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiao, Richard & Tao, Hongyin. 2007. A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of amplifiers in British English. Sociolinguistic Studies 1(2): 241–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Stratton, James M.
2022. Old English intensifiers. Journal of Historical Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo
2021. Intensification in Eighteenth Century Medical Writing. Journal of English Linguistics 49:1 ► pp. 90 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue