Cover not available

In:Corpora and the Changing Society: Studies in the evolution of English
Edited by Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi and Juhani Klemola
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 96] 2020
► pp. 169–198

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Two sides of the same coin?

Tracking the history of the intensifiers deadly and mortal

 | University of Cantabria
Published online: 8 April 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.96.07bla
Abstract
This chapter presents a corpus-based study on the origin and development of two death-related intensifiers: the adjectives and adverbs deadly and mortal. The historical sources consulted reveal that these forms have progressively adopted more general meanings, that is, they have come to be grammaticalized as intensifiers over time. Two semantic variables, type of meaning (descriptive, affective, or intensifying, along the lines of Adamson 2000) and semantic prosody (Stubbs 1995), were central to the collocational diachronic analysis undertaken here. The study focuses on British English and covers the history of deadly and mortal from their origins in Old English and Middle English, respectively, to the 20th century.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Intensifiers: An overview
  • 3.Data sources
  • 4.Deadly and mortal: A historical account
    • 4.1Preliminary remarks
    • 4.2Deadly and mortal: The origins
    • 4.3Deadly and mortal: EModE
    • 4.4Deadly and mortal: LModE and PDE
  • 5.The grammaticalization of deadly and mortal
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (44)
References
Corpora and software
ARCHER = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers 3.2. 1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013. Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber & Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California. Modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities: Northern Arizona, Southern California, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Uppsala, Michigan, Manchester, Lancaster, Bamberg, Zurich, Trier, Salford, and Santiago de Compostela. <[URL]>
ECF = Eighteenth Century Fiction. Chadwyck Healey. 1996–2018. <[URL]>
EEBOCorp 1.0 = Early English Books Online Corpus 1.0, compiled by Peter Petré. 2013. <[URL]>
HC = The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. 1991. Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. Compiled by Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MED = Middle English Dictionary. Sherman M. Kuhn, John Reidy & Robert E. Lewis (eds). 1952–2001. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. <[URL]>
NCF = Nineteenth Century Fiction. Chadwyck Healey. 2000–2018. <[URL]>
OED = Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford: OUP. <[URL]>
WordSmith 6.0. Scott, Mike. 2012. WordSmith Tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software. <[URL]>
Other references
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2018. That’s well bad: Some new intensifiers in spoken British English. In Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British English, Vaclav Brezina, Robbie Love & Karin Aijmer (eds), 60–95. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki. 2007. On the subjectivity of intensifiers. Language Sciences 29(4): 554–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breban, Tine & Davidse, Kristin. 2016. The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20(2): 221–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacchiani, Silvia. 2017. Cognitive motivation in English complex intensifying adjectives. Lexis 10: 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia & Kytö, Merja. 2014. I had lost sight of them for a bit, but I went on pretty fast: Two degree modifiers in the Old Bailey Corpus. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 243], Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker & Jukka Tuominen (eds), 29–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization: A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20(3): 303–318.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José. 2010. Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 127–163. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter. 2002. Really worthwile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 143–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louw, Bill. 2000. Contextual prosodic theory: Bringing semantic prosodies to life. In Words in Context: A Tribute to John Sinclair on his Retirement, Chris Heffer & Helen Saunston (eds), 48–94. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald. 2006. Pure grammaticalization: The development of a teenage intensifier. Language Variation and Change 18(3): 267–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2006. Adjunct, modifier, discourse marker: On the various functions of right in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica 27(1–2): 141–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén & Pahta, Päivi. 2010. Intensifiers in competition: The picture from early English medical writing. In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds), 191–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2008. Social variation in intensifier use: Constraint on –ly adverbialization in the past? English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 289–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Rissanen, Matti. 2002. Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24(3–4): 359–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio & Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma. 2012. He’s absolutely massive. It’s a super day. Madonna, she’s a wicked singer. Youth language and intensification: A corpus-based study. Text and Talk 32(6): 773–796. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree. English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 317–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 1993. Corpus evidence of language change: The case of the intensifier. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 177–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Evaluative prosody. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, Karin Aijmer & Christoph Rühlemann (eds), 279–303. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, Hans. 1994. Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed), 269–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, K. Aaron & Nordquist, Dawn. 2012. A critical and historical investigation into semantic prosody. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(2): 291–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2008. So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 361–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English. An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 37–54. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 124–139. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. (Inter)subjectification and unidirectionality. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 295–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds): 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue