In:Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise
Edited by Ute Römer-Barron, Viviana Cortes and Eric Friginal
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 95] 2020
► pp. 1–6
Introduction
Advances in corpus-based research on academic writing
Published online: 20 February 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.int
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.int
References (14)
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2016. Grammatical
Complexity in Academic English. Linguistic Change in
Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
Cao, Feng & Hu, Guangwei. 2014. Interactive
metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of
paradigmatic and disciplinary
influences. Journal of
Pragmatics 66: 15–31.
Crompton, Peter. 1997. Hedging
in academic writing: Some theoretical
problems. English for Specific
Purposes 16: 271–287.
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The
Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words,
1990-present. <[URL]> (30 September
2019).
Grabe, William & Kaplan, Robert. 1997. On
the writing of science and the science of writing: Hedging in
science text and
elsewhere. In Hedging
and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon
in Academic Texts, Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schröder (eds), 151–167. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Gray, Bethany. 2015. Linguistic
Variation in Research Articles. When Discipline Tells Only Part of
the Story [Studies in Corpus Linguistics
71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kopaczyk, Joanna & Tyrkkö, Jukka (eds). 2018. Applications
of Pattern Driven Methods in Corpus
Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics
82]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Martin, James R. 1993. Writing
Science. Literacy and Discursive
Power. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Parkinson, Jean. 2013. Representing
own and other voices in social science research
articles. International Journal of
Corpus
Linguistics 18: 199–228.