Cover not available

In:Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise
Edited by Ute Römer-Barron, Viviana Cortes and Eric Friginal
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 95] 2020
► pp. 307–332

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Stand-alone literature reviews

A new multi-dimensional analysis

 | Carnegie Mellon University
Published online: 20 February 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.13wri
Abstract
This chapter presents a new multi-dimensional analysis of stand-alone literature reviews (e.g., Annual Review of Medicine). Using the methods of Biber (1988), I analyzed 417 stand-alone literature reviews. A factor analysis of 72 grammatical features was conducted and a six-factor solution chosen. The dimensions were interpreted as Human vs. Technical/Academic Focus, Questioning/ Interpreting vs. Knowledge-Conferring, Expression of Stance, Author/Discourse Community vs. Topic Focus, Abstract vs. Concrete Focus, and Methodological Concerns vs. Description. Texts were then divided into four groups: discipline, time period, review type, and the presence or absence of methods. Factorial ANOVAs found significant differences for discipline and time period for many dimensions, whereas significant differences for presence of methods and review type were limited to one dimension each.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Corpus
    • 2.2Statistical analyses
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Dimension 1: Human vs. technical/academic focus
    • 3.2Dimension 2: Questioning/interpreting vs. knowledge-conferring
    • 3.3Dimension 3: Expression of stance
    • 3.4Dimension 4: Author/discourse community vs. topic focus
    • 3.5Dimension 5: Abstract vs. concrete focus
    • 3.6Dimension 6: Methodological concerns vs. description
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
  • Appendix
References (33)
References
ABBYY. 2013. ABBYY Finereader 12. <[URL]>
Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Biber Tagger. Flagstaff AZ: Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Multi-dimensional analysis: A historical synopsis. In Multi-Dimensional analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 11–26. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward. 2001. Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies, Douglas Biber & Susan Conrad (eds), 108–123. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Jones, James K. 2007. Vocabulary based discourse units in biology research articles. In Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 28], Douglas Biber, Ulla Connor, & Thomas Upton (eds), 175–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bizzell, Patricia. 1992. Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan. 2001. Variation among disciplinary texts: A comparison of textbooks and journal articles in biology and history. In Variation in English: Multidimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 94–107. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotos, Elena, Gray, Bethany & Smith, Jordan. 2018. Combining rhetorical move analysis with multi-dimensional analysis: Research writing across disciplines. Paper presented at the American Association for Corpus Linguistics (AACL) conference, Atlanta, Georgia, September, 2018.
Egbert, Jesse & Staples, Shelley. 2019. Doing multi-dimensional analysis in SPSS, SAS, and R. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 125–144. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feak, Christine & Swales, John M. 2009. Telling a Research Story: Writing a Literature Review. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friginal, Eric & Weigle, Sara. 2014. Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 80–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, Sheena, Nesi, Hillary, & Biber, Douglas. 2018. Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glass, Gene. 1976. Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 5: 3–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany. 2011. Exploring Academic Writing through Corpus Linguistics: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora 8(2): 153–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, Jack. A., & Römer, Ute. 2013. Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora 8(2): 183–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IBM Corporation. 2017. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version 25).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsada. 2007. Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 27], Douglas Biber, Ulla Connor, & Thomas Upton (eds), 73–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Jae-On & Mueller, Charles. W. 1978. Introduction to Factor Analysis: What it is and How to do it. Beverly Hills CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kronick, David A. 2004. ‘Devant le Deluge’ and Other Essays on Early Modern Scientific Communication. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1991. Stories and styles in two molecular biology review articles. In Textual Dynamics of the Professions, Charles Bazerman & James Paradis (eds), 45–75. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, Hillary & Gardner, Sheena. 2012. Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabachnick, Barbara G. & Fidell, Linda. S. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Heidi R. 2013. Shared moves within a genre family: Literature reviews and research articles. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL) conference, Dallas, Texas, March.
2014. Stance features within stand-alone literature reviews and research articles: An interdisciplinary register analysis. Paper presented at the American Association for Corpus Linguistics (AACL) conference, Flagstaff, Arizona, September.
2016. Linguistic and Structural Analyses of Stand-Alone Literature Reviews: Seventy-five Years of Change. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue