Cover not available

In:Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise
Edited by Ute Römer-Barron, Viviana Cortes and Eric Friginal
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 95] 2020
► pp. 227–254

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

The use of lexical patterns in engineering

A corpus-based investigation of five sub-disciplines

 | Colorado State University
 | Colorado State University
Published online: 20 February 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.10nek
Abstract
Over the past decade, engineering has been one of the most oft-chosen fields of study for domestic and international students at US colleges and universities (IIE 2017; NCES 2018). As a result, the number of students in undergraduate engineering courses has steadily grown, leading to increased attention devoted to the written discourse encountered in engineering courses. The present study investigates the linguistic overlap between published textbooks used in lower-division undergraduate engineering courses by focusing on the analysis of multi-word sequences – 5-word phrase-frames – commonly found in five engineering disciplines. Overall, it was found that, while frequency distribution and structural characteristics of the identified phrase-frames were consistent across the five corpora, there were dissimilarities in the discourse functions performed by these patterns.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Multiword sequences in discipline-specific texts
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Construction of engineering corpora
    • 2.2Identification of target phrase-frames
    • 2.3Structural and functional analysis of phrase-frames
    • 2.4Overlapping of phrase-frames
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1Distribution and variability of phrase-frames
    • 3.2Structural categories for phrase-frames
    • 3.3Functional categories for phrase-frames
    • 3.4Findings for overlapping PFs
  • 4.Pedagogical applications of findings
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
  • Appendix
References (37)
References
Archer, Arlene. 2008. ‘The place is suffering’: Enabling dialogue between students’ discourses and academic literacy conventions in engineering. English for Specific Purposes 27(3): 255–266. < >Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26(3): 263–286. < >Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana. 2004. If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. < >Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrd, Pat & Coxhead, Averil. 2010. On the other hand: Lexical bundles in academic writing and in the teaching of EAP. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL 5: 31–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Lin. 2010. An investigation of lexical bundles in ESP textbooks and electrical engineering introductory textbooks. In Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication, David Wood (ed.), 107–125. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunningham, Kelly J. 2017. A phraseological exploration of recent mathematics research articles through key phrase frames. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 25: 71–83. < >Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fletcher, William H. 2012. KfNgram (a free software program). <[URL]> (8 January 2019).
Fuster-Márquez, Miguel & Pennock-Speck, Barry. 2015. Target frames in British hotel websites. International Journal of English Studies 15(1): 51–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilmore, Alexander & Millar, Neil. 2018. The language of civil engineering research articles: A corpus-based approach. English for Specific Purposes 51: 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabowski, Łukasz. 2015. Phrase frames in English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven study of intra-disciplinary register variation. Research in Language 13(3): 266–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas. 2013. Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 109–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsu, Wenhua. 2014. Measuring the vocabulary load of engineering textbooks for EFL undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes 33: 54–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1): 4–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Institute of International Education (IIE). 2017. International students by field of study, 2015/2016. Open Doors Report on International Education Exchange. <[URL]> (19 July 2019).
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2015. Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes 37: 74–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Dilin. 2012. The most frequently-used multi-word constructions in academic written English: A multi-corpus study. English for Specific Purposes 31(1): 25–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, Xiaofei, Yoon, Jungwan & Kisselev, Olesya. 2018. A phrase-frame list for social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36: 76–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2018. Bachelor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by field of study: Selected years, 1970–71 through 2015–16. <[URL]> (15 March 2019).
Nekrasova-Beker, Tatiana. 2019. Discipline-specific use of language patterns in engineering: A comparison of published pedagogical materials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 41: Article 100774. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orna-Montesinos, Concepcion. 2008. A contribution to the lexis of construction engineering textbooks: The case of building and construction. Ibérica 16: 59–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rezoug, Fares & Vincent, Benet. 2018. Exploring lexical bundles in the Algerian Corpus of Engineering. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(1): 47–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, Marin S., Stoller, Fredricka L. & Jones, James K. 2008. Using the ACS journals search to validate assumptions about writing in chemistry and improve chemistry writing instruction. Journal of Chemical Education 85(5): 650–654. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth. 2015. Quantification in conference talks and proceedings articles in engineering. English for Specific Purposes 38: 11–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, Rita & Ellis, Nick C. 2010. An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4): 487–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomson, Haidee E. 2016. Presenting lexical bundles for explicit noticing with schematic linguistic representation. TESL-EJ 20(2): 1–13. [URL]
Todd, Richard W. 2017. An opaque engineering word list: Which words should a teacher focus on? English for Specific Purposes 45: 31–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Ying. 2019. A functional analysis of text-oriented formulaic expressions in written academic discourse: Multiword sequences vs. single words. English for Specific Purposes 54: 50–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, Jeremy. 2007. Collocation and technicality in EAP engineering. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(1): 18–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. A basic engineering English word list for less proficient foundation engineering undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes 28: 170–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe, Joanna. 2009. How technical communication textbooks fail engineering students. Technical Communication Quarterly 18(4): 351–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, David C. & Appel, Randy. 2014. Multiword constructions in first year business and engineering university textbooks and EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 15: 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoder, Brian L. 2017. Engineering by the numbers: 2017 ASEE profiles of engineering and engineering technology colleges. American Society for Engineering Education. <[URL]> (10 December 2018).
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Li, Yan & Hong Lei
2025. Lexical Bundles in L1 and L2 English Academic Writing: Convergent and Divergent Usage. SAGE Open 15:2 DOI logo
Cui, Xuanjun & Yoonjung Kim
2023. Structural and functional differences between bundles of different lengths: A corpus-driven study. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Wang, Yu, Tianshuang Ge & Zhilei Ren
2022. Noun Phrasal Complexity in Computer Science Conference Abstracts. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue