Cover not available

In:Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise
Edited by Ute Römer-Barron, Viviana Cortes and Eric Friginal
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 95] 2020
► pp. 205–226

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Adjectives as nominal pre-modifiers in chemistry and applied linguistics research articles

 | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
 | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
 | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
 | Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri
 | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Published online: 20 February 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.09dut
Abstract
This chapter analyzes the use of attributive adjectives as nominal pre-modifiers in two corpora: CorAChem (Corpus of Articles in Chemistry) and CorAAL (Corpus of Articles in Applied Linguistics) composed of 150 articles each. Our aim is to understand the use of pre-modifying adjectives in noun phrases (NPs), considering which adjectives are used as well as the NP size and frequency across disciplines. The results show that both corpora carry more classifiers than descriptors. Nevertheless, each discipline favors the use of adjectives with specific functions. Both corpora use long premodifying sequences, but CorAChem carries a greater number of longer sequences. The use of long NPs may affect understanding due to the interrelation among the NP constituents as shown in CorAChem.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1NP lexical similarities
    • 3.2Types of attributive adjectives and their NP function
    • 3.3NP size and NP sequence frequency
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (30)
References
Ang, Leng Hong, Tan, Kim Hua & He, Mengyu. 2017. A corpus-based collocational analysis of noun premodification types in academic writing. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies 23(1): 115–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2013. AntCLAWSGUI (Version 1.1.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. <[URL]>
Berlage, Eva. 2014. Noun Phrase Complexity in English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2014. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1993. Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8(4): 243–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26(3): 263–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana. 2004. If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(1): 2–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language & Linguistics 15(2): 223–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany & Poonpon, Kornwipa. 2011. Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 5–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bulté, Bram & Housen, Alex. 2012. Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency [Language Learning & Language Teaching 32], Alex Housen, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder (eds), 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garside, Roger. 1987. The CLAWS Word-tagging System. In The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-based Approach, Roger Garside, Geoffrey Leech & Geoffrey Sampson (eds). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2004. The Language of Science. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Martin, James R. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Brighton: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrero-Zorita, Carlos & Sandoval, Antonio M. 2016. Sentence length and NP complexity of general and medical written academic and media texts. An analysis using a trained syntactic parser. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics 1: 181–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2009. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System 59: 116–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutter, Jo-Anne. 2015. A Corpus Based Analysis of Noun Modification in Empirical Research Articles in Applied Linguistics. MA thesis, Portland State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallotti, Gabriele. 2015. A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research 31(1): 117–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, Jean & Musgrave, Jill. 2014. Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 48–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2014. Why academics stink at writing. Chronicle of Higher Education, 26. <[URL]>
Queiroz, Jessica M. S. 2019. The Grammatical Complexity of English Noun Phrases in Brazilian Learner’s Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Study. MA thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John & Feak, Christine. 2004. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills, Vol. 1. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Gyusuk. 2015. Grammatical Features of Structural Elaboration and Compression Common in Advanced ESL Academic Writing. MA thesis, Brigham Young University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hu, Yiyang & Qingshun He
2023. A Corpus-Based Study of the Distributions of Adnominals Across Registers and Disciplines. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue