Cover not available

In:Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise
Edited by Ute Römer-Barron, Viviana Cortes and Eric Friginal
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 95] 2020
► pp. 183–204

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Lexical bundles as reflections of disciplinary norms in Spanish and English literary criticism, history, and psychology research

 | Georgia State University
 | Georgia State University
Published online: 20 February 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.08lak
Abstract
While corpus studies on academic writing have improved instructional materials for writing in the hard sciences, humanities and social sciences world language writing pedagogy remains open to development. In the interest of data-driven Spanish for academic purposes curricula, using English and Spanish corpora of psychology, history and literary criticism articles, we analyzed nouns occurring in sentence-subject position in 100 randomly-sampled sentences. In both languages, psychology had significantly more epistemic, and fewer phenomenal, sentence subject nouns than the other two fields. We extended our analysis to lexical bundles containing Spanish-English equivalent noun phrases in sentence-subject position which occurred significantly more often in psychology in both languages. The results are discussed in terms of scientific and humanities writing pedagogy for both languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of related literature
    • 2.1LBs and their connection to argumentation in disciplines
    • 2.2Lexicogrammatical features and their connection to argumentation
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Corpus
      • 3.1.1History
      • 3.1.2Literary criticism
      • 3.1.3Psychology
    • 3.2LB identification
    • 3.3Statistical analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Preliminary study: Replicating MacDonald’s study of sentence subjects
    • 4.2Main study: Subcorpus-level differences at the formulaic language level
      • 4.2.1Cross-linguistic, intra-disciplinary variation
      • 4.2.2Cross-linguistic and disciplinary variation
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1“Facts”: The most frequent epistemic bundles in all disciplines
    • 5.2Further expressions of epistemicity in psychology writing
    • 5.3Equivalent phenomenal bundles in all disciplines
    • 5.4History-specific phenomenal bundles
    • 5.5Psychology-specific phenomenal bundles
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (42)
References
Allen, Sture. 1970. Frequency Dictionary of Present-Day Swedish Based on Newspaper Material, 1: Graphic Words. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975. Frequency Dictionary of Present-Day Swedish Based on Newspaper, 3: Collocations. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt & Eeg-Olofsson, Mats. 1990. Phraseology in spoken English: Presentation of a project. In Theory and Practice in Corpus Linguistics, Jan Aarts & Willem Meijs (eds), 1–26. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1993. Recurrent word combinations in spoken English. In Proceedings of the Fifth Nordic Association for English Studies Conference, Julian D’Arcy (ed.), 17–27. Reykjavik: University of Iceland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, Tony, de Barros Silva e Teixeira, Rosana & de Lurdes São Bento Ferreira, Telma. 2014. Lexical bundles in Brazilian Portuguese. In Working with Portuguese Corpora, Tony Berber Sardinha & Telma de Lurdes São Bento Ferreira (eds), 33–68. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bestgen, Yves. 2017. Getting rid of the Chi-square and Log-likelihood tests for analysing vocabulary differences between corpora. Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Lingüístics 22: 33–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Yu-Hua, & Baker, Paul. 2010. Lexical Bundles in L1 and L2 Academic Writing. Language Learning and Technology 14(2): 30–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana. 2002. Lexical Bundles in Academic Writing in History and Biology. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 397–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and Education 17(4): 391–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in academic history writing in English and Spanish. Corpora 3(1): 43–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(1): 33–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Situating lexical bundles in the formulaic language spectrum: origins and functional analysis development. In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66], Viviana Cortes & Eniko Csomay (eds), 197–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, Scott, Allen, Laura, Kyle, Kristopher & McNamara, Danielle. 2014. Analyzing discourse processing using a simple natural language processing tool. Discourse Processes 51(5–6): 511–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. <[URL]>
Department of World Languages & Cultures. 2015. Georgia State University Department of World Languages & Cultures Graduate Handbook, 22 August 2014. <[URL]> (20 August 2018).
Doyle, Michael. 2018. Spanish for the professions and specific purposes: Curricular mainstay. Hispania 100(5): 95–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erman, Britt & Warren, Beatrice. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 20(1): 29–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francomano, Emily. 2012. Graduate students in Spanish need to become humanities professors. Hispania 95(3): xviii–xix.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuentes Cortés, Miguel. 2012. El discurso científico de la historia: Análisis estructural y retórico de los artículos de investigación en historia. Boletín de Filología 47(1): 89–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilmore, Alexander & Millar, Neil. 2018. The language of civil engineering research articles: A corpus-based approach. English for Specific Purposes 51: 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Arías, Cristián. 2011. La formulación de los objetivos en artículos de investigación científica en cuatro disciplinas: Historia, Lingüística, Literatura y Biología. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 11(2): 401–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hertel, Tammy & Dings, Abby. 2014. The undergraduate Spanish major curriculum: Realities and faculty perceptions. Foreign Language Annals 47(3): 546–568. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. The undergraduate Spanish major curriculum: Faculty, alumni, and student perceptions. Foreign Language Annals 50(4): 697–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jalali, Hassan. 2014. A comparative study of anticipatory it lexical bundles in applied linguistics and analytical chemistry research articles. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies 3(1): 24–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig. 2007. Seeing Through Multilingual Corpora: On the Use of Corpora in Contrastive Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 26]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Kathryn. 2017. Lexical Bundles in Applied Linguistics and Literature Writing: A Comparison of Intermediate English Learners and Professionals. MA thesis, Portland State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, YouJin. 2009. Korean lexical bundles in conversation and academic texts. Corpora 4(2): 135–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, Susan. 1994. Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narvaja de Arnoux, Elvira, Di Stefano, Mariana & Pereira, Cecilia. 2002. La lectura y la escritura en la universidad. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Fan, Reppen, Randi & Biber, Douglas. 2016. Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in Telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 21: 60–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, Magali. 2013. Lexical bundles and L1 transfer effects. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(3): 391–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2014. Formulaic language in L1 and L2 expert academic writing: Convergent and divergent usage. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 84–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, YuKyoung & Kim, YouJin. 2017. Using lexical bundles to teach articles to L2 English learners of different proficiencies. System 69: 79–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, YuKyoung, Cortes, Viviana & Yoo, Isaiah Wonhoo. 2018. Using lexical bundles as a tool to analyze definite article use in L2 academic writing: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 39: 29–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tankó, Gyula. 2017. Literary research article abstracts: An analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 27: 42–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole, Cortes, Viviana & Biber, Douglas. 2007. Lexical bundles in speech and writing. In Working with Spanish Corpora, Giovanni Parodi (ed.), 217–230. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viera Echevarría, Carolina. 2014. Academic Spanish in the United States: Discourse Analysis of Academic Conference Presentations. PhD dissertation, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Alasmary, Abdullah
2025. Lexical bundles in psychology lectures and textbooks: a contrastive corpus-based study with implications for academic writing. Frontiers in Psychology 16 DOI logo
Cortes, Viviana & William Lake
2023. LBiaP. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Lake, William Michael & I-Hsien Lee
2022. Lexical Bundles of Stance in Upper-Level Argumentative Literary Essays and Expert-Level Literary Criticism Articles: A Comparative Dispersion Study. In World Englishes, Global Classrooms, ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue