Cover not available

In:Learner Corpora and Language Teaching
Edited by Sandra Götz and Joybrato Mukherjee
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92] 2019
► pp. 7–28

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

The Trinity Lancaster Corpus

Applications in language teaching and materials development

 | Lancaster University
 | Lancaster University
 | Lancaster University
Published online: 6 May 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.92.02gab
Abstract
Corpora and corpus techniques have long been an important source of knowledge about language; they have also been increasingly used for language teaching purposes. This chapter discusses the role of spoken learner corpora in language pedagogy and in development of language teaching materials. In particular, it focuses on the Trinity Lancaster Corpus (TLC) and its pedagogical applications. With over four million words, the TLC is one of the largest corpora of L2 spoken English, representing language from L2 English speakers engaged in different speaking tasks. The chapter uses data from the TLC to illustrate the use of corpus findings in teaching pragmatics in spoken language use, focusing on three case studies: expression of disagreement, ability to adjust language choice according to linguistic setting, and engaged listenership.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Trinity Lancaster Corpus: Description of the resource
    • 2.1Corpus overview
      • 2.1.1The nature of interaction: Linguistic setting and the speaking tasks
      • 2.1.2Linguistic and cultural background
      • 2.1.3Proficiency in spoken English
      • 2.1.4Sociolinguistic characteristics: Age, gender and education
      • 2.1.5Learning experience: Age of acquisition, learning history and patterns of use
    • 2.2Accessing and searching the TLC
  • 3.Issues in the corpus analysis of learner language
    • 3.1Transcription: Capturing spoken learner language
    • 3.2Comparison of (sub)corpora
  • 4.Applications of spoken learner corpora in language teaching
    • 4.1The use of spoken corpora in language teaching
    • 4.2Using learner corpora in language teaching
  • 5.Using the TLC for pedagogical purposes
    • 5.1Comparison across proficiency levels: Expression of disagreement
      • Corpus findings
      • Pedagogical implications
    • 5.2Comparison across tasks: Ability to adjust linguistic choice according to situation
      • Corpus findings
      • Pedagogical implications
    • 5.3Comparison between less and more successful learners: Active and engaged listenership
      • Corpus findings
      • Pedagogical implications
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (55)
References
Adolphs, Svenja & Knight, Dawn. 2010. Building a spoken corpus. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Anne O’Keefe & Michael McCarthy (eds), 38–52. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, Mossman, Sabrina, & Vellenga, Heidi E. 2014. Developing corpus-based materials to teach pragmatic routines. TESOL Journal 6(3): 499–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, Gena R. 2010. Using Corpora in the Language Learning Classroom: Corpus Linguistics for Teachers. Ann Arbor IN: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Callies, Marcus. 2015. Using learner corpora in language testing and assessment: Current practice and future challenges. In Studies in Learner Corpus Linguistics: Research and Applications for Foreign Language Teaching and Assessment, Erik K. Castello, Katherine Ackerley & Francesca Coccetta (eds), 21–35. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlsen, Cecilie. 2012. Proficiency level – A fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora. Applied Linguistics 33(2): 161–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald, & McCarthy, Michael. 2017. Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics 38(1): 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, Angela. 2015. The learner corpus as a pedagogic corpus. In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 445–464. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2011. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe. <[URL]> (28 May 2018).
Cullen, Richard & Kuo, I-Chun. 2007. Spoken grammar and ELT course materials: a missing link? TESOL Quarterly 41(2): 361–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2004. The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in French as a foreign language: An overview. Journal of French Language Studies 14(3): 301–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1991. Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 1(1): 71–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farr, Fiona. 2003. Engaged listenership in spoken academic discourse: the case of student-tutor meetings. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(1): 67–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert, Götz, Sandra & Werner, Valentin. 2016. The present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and writing. In Re-Assessing the Present Perfect, Valentin Werner, Elena Seoane & Cristina Suárez-Gómez (eds), 297–338. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gablasova, Dana. 2014. Areas of difference between more and less successful candidates in GESE at Grades 7 and 8. Commissioned report. Trinity College London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gablasova, Dana & Brezina, Vaclav. 2015. Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech? Evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 117–136. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Disagreement in L2 spoken English: From learner corpus research to corpus-based teaching materials. In Learner Corpus Research: New Perspectives and Applications, Vaclav Brezina & Lynne Flowerdew (eds), 69–89. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gablasova, Dana, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony. 2017. Exploring learner language through corpora: Comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. Language Learning 67(S1): 155–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gablasova, Dana, Brezina, Vaclav, McEnery, Tony, & Boyd, Elaine. 2017. Epistemic stance in spoken L2 English: The effect of task and speaker style. Applied Linguistics 38(1): 613–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gablasova, Dana, Brezina, Vaclav, & McEnery, Tony. In preparation. The Trinity Lancaster Corpus: Development, description and application.
Gilmore, Alex. 2004. A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal 58(4): 363–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Paquot, Magali. 2008. Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction 1(1): 41–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, De Cock, Sylvie, & Granger, Sylviane. 2010. The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane. 2004. Computer learner corpus research: Current state and future prospects. In Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective, Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds), 123–145. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 7–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishihara, Noriko & Cohen, Andrew D. 2014. Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott & Pavlenko, Aneta. 2008. Cross-linguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Christian, Byrne, Shelly & Halenko, Nicola. 2017. Successful Spoken English: Findings from Learner Corpora. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Mehlmauer-Larcher, Barbara. 2005. Computer corpora and the language classroom: On the potential limitations of computer corpora in language teaching. ReCALL 16(1): 65–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele & Rose, Kenneth R. 2002. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít. 2014. The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2000. Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning 50(4): 675–724. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Limberg, Holger. 2016. Teaching how to apologize: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input. Language Teaching Research 20(6): 700–718. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael & O’Keeffe, Anne. 2004. Research in the teaching of speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24: 26–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew. 2011. Corpus linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Xiao, Richard. 2011. What corpora can offer in language teaching and learning. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, Eli Hinkel (ed.), 364–380. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2006. Corpus linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art – and beyond. English Corpus Linguistics 3: 5–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2004. Learner corpora and their potential for language teaching. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John Sinclair (ed.), 125–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, McCarthy, Michael & Carter, Ronald. 2007. From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona & Pochon-Berger, Evelyne. 2011. Developing “methods” for interaction: a cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In L2 Interactional Competence and Development, Joan Kelly Hall, John Hellermann & Simona Pekarek Doehler (eds), 206–243. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 57–101. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reppen, Randi. 2010. Using Corpora in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roever, Carsten. 2010. Effects of cultural background in a test of ESL pragmalinguistics: A DIF approach. In Pragmatics Language Learning, Gabriele Kasper, Hanh T. Nguyen, Dina R. Yoshimi & Jim K. Yoshioka (eds), 187–212. Honolulu HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Römer, Ute. 2010. Using general and specialized corpora in English language teaching: Past, present and future. In Corpus-Based Approaches to English Language Teaching, Maria C. Campoy, Begoña Belles-Fortuno & Maria Lluisa (eds), 18–35. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, Kenneth R. 2005. On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System 33(3): 385–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, Naoko. 2011. Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 289–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thonus, Terese. 2007. Listener responses as a pragmatic resource for learners of English. The CATESOL Journal 19(1): 132–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timmis, Ivor. 2002. Native-speaker norms and International English: A classroom view. ELT Journal 56(3): 240–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Corpus Linguistics for ELT: Research and Practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trinity College London. 2016. Exam Information: Graded Examinations in Spoken English (GESE). <[URL]> along with videos of the speaking tasks (28 May 2018).
Usó-Juan, Esther. 2007. The presentation and practice of the communicative act of requesting in textbooks: Focusing on modifiers. In Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning, Eva A. Soler & Maria P. Safont Jordà (eds), 223–243. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vellenga, Heidi. 2004. Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely. TESL-EJ 8(2): 1–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VOICE. 2013. The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English. Director: Barbara Seidlhofer; Researchers: Angelika Breiteneder, Theresa Klimpfinger, Stefan Majewski, Ruth Osimk-Teasdale, Marie-Luise Pitzl, Michael Radeka. <[URL]> (28 May 2018).
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1980. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wall, Diane & Taylor, Cathy. 2014. Communicative Language Testing (CLT): Reflections on the “Issues Revisited” from the perspective of an examinations board. Language Assessment Quarterly 11(2): 170–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, Steve. 2010. What features of spoken and written corpora can be exploited in creating language teaching materials and syllabuses. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Anne O’Keefe & Michael McCarthy (eds), 333–345. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery
2022. The Trinity Lancaster Corpus. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Valenzuela, Hannah
2020. Pragmatics. In Linguistics for TESOL, ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue