Cover not available

In:Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse
Edited by Teresa Fanego and Paula Rodríguez-Puente
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 91] 2019
► pp. 235–260

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 10
The representation of citizens and monarchy in Acts of Parliament in 1800 to 2000

Identifying social roles through collocations

 | University of Helsinki
Published online: 6 February 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.91.10leh
This chapter considers the representation of citizens and the British monarchy in Acts of Parliament from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in the Corpus of Late Modern English Statutes. The analysis investigates collocates associated with those two social groups and traces their semantic preferences and semantic prosodies. The portrayals of the groups are related to developments in the socio-historical context and legislation. The study suggests that the acts form notably dissimilar representations of the monarchy and citizens. The Crown is generally addressed in a respectful manner. The role of the citizens, by contrast, improves considerably in the data: the nineteenth-century acts focus on the criminal actions of the citizens, while their rights are emphasised in the following century.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Representation of social groups and earlier studies
  • 3.Collocation analysis
  • 4.Genre studies and historical pragmatics
  • 5.Data: Corpus of Late Modern English Statutes
  • 6.Method of analysis
  • 7.Overview of the frequencies of different social groups
  • 8.The representation of the citizens: Person
  • 9.The representation of the monarchy
  • 10.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc. Computer software. Tokyo: Waseda University. <[URL]>
Bäcklund, Ingegerd. 2006. Modifiers describing men and women in nineteenth-century English. In Nineteenth-century English: Stability and Change, Merja Kytö, Mats Rydén & Erik Smitterberg (eds), 17–55. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2014. Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. The shapes of collocation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21(2): 139–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burr, Vivien. 2002. The Person in Social Psychology. New York NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornish, William, J. Stuart Anderson, Ray Cocks, Michael Lobban, Patrick Polden & Keith Smith. 2010. The Oxford History of the Laws of England, 1820–1914, Vols. 11 & 13. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpus of Late Modern English Statutes. 2017. Unpublished corpus. Compiled by Anu Lehto. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas & Paul Baker. 2008. Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum Seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics 36(1): 5–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2013. 50-something years of work on collocations: What is or should be next… International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 137–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gupta, Kat. 2015. The Representation of the British Suffrage Movement. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2007. Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(2): 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Andreas & Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. The Historical perspective in pragmatics. In Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35], Andreas H. Jucker (ed), 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirby, Peter. 2003. Child Labour in Britain, 1750–1870. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehto, Anu. 2015. The Genre of Early Modern English Statutes: Complexity in Historical Legal Language. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Binomials and multinomials in Early Modern English Parliamentary Acts. In Binomials in the History of English: Fixed and Flexible, Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (eds), 241–260. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Helen Baker. Forthcoming. Language surrounding poverty in Early Modern England: A corpus-based investigation of how people living in the seventeenth-century perceived the criminalized poorIn From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds). Amsterdam: Brill/Rodopi.
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Mark McGlashan & Robbie Love. 2015. Press and social media reaction to ideologically inspired murder: The case of Lee Rigby. Discourse & Communication 9(2): 237–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLean, Janet. 2012. Searching for the State in British Legal Thought: Competing Conceptions of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
National Archives of Britain 1802–2000. Acts of Parliament. <[URL]>
Norberg, Cathrine. 2016. Naughty boys and sexy girls: The representation of young individuals in a web-based corpus of English. Journal of English Linguistics 44(4): 291–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds). 2010. Social Roles and Language Practices in Late Modern English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 195]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2004. “Utterly content in each other’s company”: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1): 131–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearce, Michael. 2008. Investigating the collocational behaviour of man and woman in the BNC using Sketch Engine. Corpora 3(1): 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rees, Rosemary. 2001. Poverty and Public Health: 1815–1948. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigley, Robert & Janet Holmes. 2002. Looking at girls in corpora of English. Journal of English Linguistics 30(2): 138–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John, Susan Jones & Robert Daley. 2004. English Collocation Studies: The OSTI Report. Ramesh Krishnamurthy (ed). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(2): 215–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sveen, Hanna Andersdotter. 2010. Good-natured fellows and poor mothers: Defining social roles in British nineteenth-century children’s literature. In Pahta, Nevala, Nurmi & Palander-Collin (eds), 211–228.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2015. Genre dynamics in the history of English. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds), 256–270. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Fitzmaurice, Susan M. 2007. What it is and how to do it. In Methods in Historical Pragmatics, Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 11–36. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Jucker, Andreas H. 2010. Trends and developments in historical pragmatics. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 3–30. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Jucker, Andreas H. 2015. Twenty years of historical pragmatics: Origins, developments and changing thought styles. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1): 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thane, Pat. 2010. Women and political participation in England, 1918–1970. In Women and Citizenship in Britain and Ireland in the 20th Century: What Difference did the Vote Make? Esther Breitenbach & Pat Thane (eds), 11–28. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiao, Richard. 2015. Collocation. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 106–124. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lehto, Anu
2022.  Unhappy patients and eminent physicians . In Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 330], ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue