Cover not available

In:Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse
Edited by Teresa Fanego and Paula Rodríguez-Puente
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 91] 2019
► pp. 149–170

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 7
Are law reports an ‘agile’ or an ‘uptight’ register?

Tracking patterns of historical change in the use of colloquial and complexity features

 | Northern Arizona University
 | Iowa State University
Published online: 6 February 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.91.07bib
Language change is a natural evolutionary process, and as a result it is reasonable to expect that all registers will undergo historical change to some extent. While some registers adopt linguistic innovations readily, others resist such changes and exhibit more conservative patterns of change. This chapter considers the extent to which law reports have adopted linguistic innovations observed in other written registers (fiction, newspapers, and science prose). The analysis considers features related to two competing factors influencing historical change in written texts: popularization (the adoption of colloquial features associated with the need to write texts for a large and general population of readers) and economy (increases in the use of phrasal complexity features to create informationally-dense texts for specialist readers). The analysis shows that compared to other written registers, law reports have been relatively conservative and resistant to historical change. These results are interpreted relative to the situational and communicative characteristics of law reports.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Corpora and methods
  • 3.Historical change in the use of general linguistic features
  • 4.Historical change in the use of popularization/colloquial features
  • 5.Historical change in the use of clausal complexity features
  • 6.Historical change in the use of phrasal complexity features
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (23)
References
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2003. Compressed noun phrase structures in newspaper discourse: The competing demands of popularization vs. economy. In New Media Language, Jean Aitchison & Diana Lewis (eds), 169–183. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. University Language. A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad Susan. 2009. Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, & Reppen, Randi. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65: 487–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. (Reprinted in Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas (eds). 2001. pp.66–83).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 2–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 223–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The competing demands of popularization vs. economy: Written language in the age of mass literacy. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (eds), 314–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Jones, James K. 2008. Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 1286–1304. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas (eds). 2001. Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa, Rodríguez-Puente, Paula, López-Couso, María José, Méndez-Naya, Belén, Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma, Blanco-García, Cristina & Tamaredo, Iván. 2017. The Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR): A resource for analysing the development of English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 41: 53–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farrelly, Michael & Seoane, Elena. 2012. Democratisation. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 392–401. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, Alan G., Harmon, Joseph E. & Reidy, Michael. 2002. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars, Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Bohmann, Axel. 2015. Which-hunting and the standard English relative clause. Language 91(4): 806–836. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian. 1999. “Agile” and “uptight” genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 1997. The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. In Corpus-Based Studies in English. Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17), Stockholm, May 15–19, 1996, Magnus Ljung (ed), 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Twentieth-century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Leonardi, Vanessa & Patrizia Giampieri
2025. Corpora and Linguistic Analysis. In Legal English through the Ages, ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2024. Is legal discourse really “outside the ravages of time”?. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula & David Hernández-Coalla
2023. The Corpus of Contemporary English Legal Decisions, 1950–2021 (CoCELD): A new tool for analysing recent changes in English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 47:1 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Mattioli, Virginia
2022. La tendencia hacia la simplificación en el discurso especializado y no-especializado: ampliando el alcance de los estudios de traducción basados en corpus al análisis multidiscursivo. TRANS: Revista de Traductología 26:1 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Wood, Margaret
2022. A lexico-grammatical comparison of statutory law and popular written language. Research in Corpus Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue