In:Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes
Edited by Alexandra U. Esimaje, Ulrike Gut and Bassey E. Antia
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 88] 2019
► pp. 355–372
Chapter 3.2African corpora for standards in African academic English
Case studies on prepositions
Published online: 13 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.88.15sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.88.15sch
Abstract
This contribution proposes to replace the traditional native-speaker model at African universities with a sophisticated and stratified corpus model of nation-, university- and department-specific usage. It illustrates that the long-discussed realistic “national standard” may be possible – at least for restricted domains at advanced levels such as postgraduate studies. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of prepositions and their variation in three case studies shows that there is some flexibility in preposition usage: cases where different preposition choices can be explained by equally valid cognitive principles, cases where the addition of prepositions may be acceptable because this adds explicitness (which may be preferred in non-native contexts) and cases where prepositions may appear redundant since there is no choice and no semantic opposition. Although sociolinguistic values and attitudes may be necessary complements to linguistic frequency analyses, a careful corpus-linguistic study of prepositional choices irrespective of standardised native conventions is the basis for all discussions of new functional standards for African English.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A corpus-based functional view on standards for Africa
- 2.1Five criteria for accepting non-standard features
- 2.2New focus on “problem cases” in real usage
- 3.Corpus data contexts
- 4.Prepositions as a special case for variability in English grammar
- 4.1Quantitative corpus comparisons
- 4.2Three case studies on alternative, explicit and implicit prepositions
- 4.2.1Replacement or (free variation) alternative prepositions: The case of fill in/out/up
- 4.2.2Addition or explicit preposition: The case of discuss about
- 4.2.3Omission or implicit preposition: The case of suffer
- 5.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (34)
Angogo, Rachel & Hancock, Ian. 1980. English in Africa: Emerging standards or diverging regionalisms? English World-Wide 1: 67–96.
Bamgbose, Ayo. 1971. The English language in Nigeria. In The English Language in West Africa, John Walter Spencer (ed.), 35–48. London: Longman.
. 1982. Standard Nigerian English: Issues of identification. In The Other Tongue: English across Cultures, Braj Kachru (ed.), 99–111. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.
Davies, Mark & Fuchs, Robert. 2015. Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide 36: 1–28.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
Hickey, Raymond. 2012. Standard English and standards of English. In Standards of English: Codified Varieties around the World, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 1–33. Cambridge: CUP.
Jibril, Munzali. 1991. The sociolinguistics of prepositional usage in Nigerian English. In English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspective, Jenny Cheshire (ed.), 519–537. Cambridge: CUP.
Kachru, Braj B. 1990. The Alchemy of English: The Spread, Functions, and Models of Non-native Englishes. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.
Kautzsch, Alexander. 2019. Lexical and morpho-syntactic features of Namibian English on the web: A corpus-based approach. In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 88], Alexandra Esimaje, Ulrike Gut & Bassey Antia (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds). 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (22 January 2018).
Lindstromberg, Seth. 1998. English Prepositions Explained. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mair, Christian & Mollin, Sandra. 2007. Getting at the standards behind the standard ideology: What corpora can tell us about linguistic norms. In Anglistentag 2006. Proceedings, Sabine Volk-Birke & Julia Lippert (eds), 341–353. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2017. English in Africa – a diachronic typology. In The History of English: Varieties of English, Alexander Berg & Laurel Brinton (eds), 330–348. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Mindt, Dieter & Weber, Christel. 1989. Prepositions in American and British English. World Englishes 8(2): 229–238.
Mwangi, Serah. 2003. Prepositions in Kenyan English: A Corpus-based Study in Lexical-Grammatical Variation. PhD dissertation, Chemnitz University of Technology.
Nkemleke, Daniel. 2011. Exploring Academic Writing in Cameroon English: A Corpus-based Perspective. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
. 2019. Practical corpus linguistics: Designing and exploiting a written corpus for research with special reference to Cameroon English. In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 88], Alexandra Esimaje, Ulrike Gut & Bassey Antia (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
Pienemann, Manfred. 1998. Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Platt, John Talbot, Weber, Heidi & Lian, Ho Mian. 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
. 2002. Prototypes, transfer and idiomaticity: An empirical analysis of local prepositions in English and German. In Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, Luis Iglesias Rabade & Susanna M. Doval Suarez (eds), 947–959. Santiago de Compstella: University of Santiago de Compostela.
. 2011. Using corpora as an innovative tool to compare varieties of English around the world: The International Corpus of English. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 1–2: 21–37.
. 2012. Standards of English in East Africa. In Standards of English: Codified Varieties around the World, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 229–255. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2015a. Graduate academic writing in Europe in comparison: A research-based approach to metalanguage and genre. In Graduate Academic Writing for South Eastern Europe: Practical and Theoretical Perspectives [REAL Studies 8], Josef Schmied (ed.), 1–24. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
. 2015b. Academic writing world-wide: Comparing metadiscourse conventions, credibility, and new functional standards. In Academic Writing and Research across Disciplines in Africa. From Students to Experts, Josef Schmied & Daniel Nkemleke (eds), 9–34. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
Schmied, Josef & Hofmann, Matthias. Forthcoming. New digital methodologies for old grammar problems: Corpus analyses and eye-tracking to discover non-native English article usage preferences. Anglistentag 2017. Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Schmied, Josef & Nkemleke, Daniel. 2010. Prepositions in Cameroon and Kenyan English: Comparability on the basis of text corpora. Syllabus Review 1: 31–53.
(eds). 2016. Academic Writing and Research across Disciplines in Africa. From Students to Experts [REAL Studies 10]. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
