Cover not available

In:Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics:
Edited by Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82] 2018
► pp. 189–212

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 8
Lexical bundles in Wikipedia articles and related texts

Exploring disciplinary variation

 | University of Helsinki
Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.08hil
Abstract
Wikipedia is widely used by academics and students in higher education, but research on the linguistic characteristics of this genre is scarce (Kuteeva 2016). This paper explores the usefulness of lexical bundles as an analytical tool to describe disciplinary variation within Wikipedia articles, and to contrast Wikipedia writing with two neighbouring genres, student essays and research articles. The results indicate that the occurrence of lexical bundles in Wikipedia varies between disciplines, which is in broad agreement with previous studies on other academic genres. The analysis of bundles also suggests that a credible authorial persona is less crucial to Wikipedia articles. Indicative of this is the low frequency of bundles indicating stance and engagement, which are characteristic of professional academic writing (e.g. Hyland 2008a).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Corpus and context
  • 4.Data preparation and analysis
  • 5.Discussion of findings
    • 5.1Frequency of bundles across genres and disciplines
    • 5.2Disciplinary variation in Wikipedia articles
    • 5.3Genre-based variation within disciplines
      • 5.3.1Economics
      • 5.3.2Medicine
      • 5.3.3Literary criticism
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Ädel, Annelie & Erman, Britt. 2012. Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes 31(2): 81–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul & Chen, Yu-Hua. 2010. Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology 14(2): 30–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baroni, Marco & Bernardini, Silvia. 2004. BootCaT: Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. In Proceedings of LREC 2004, 1313–16. <[URL]>
Barton, Matt. 2005. Rhetoric and Composition. A Guide for the College Writer. Wikibooks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barton, Matt & Robert E. Cummings (eds.). 2008. Wiki Writing: Collaborative Learning in the College Classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles. 1981. What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11(3): 361–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becher, Tony & Trowler, Paul. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26: 263–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana. 2004. If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana. 2004. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23: 397–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2015. The Wikipedia Corpus. <[URL]>
Durrant, Philip. 2014. Discipline and level specificity in university students’ written vocabulary. Applied Linguistics 35(3): 328–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics 38(2): 165–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eijkman, Henk. 2010. Academics and Wikipedia: Reframing Web 2.0+ as a disruptor of traditional academic power-knowledge arrangements. Campus-Wide Information Systems 27(3): 173–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine & Kinn, Torodd. 2006. Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 148]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane. 1998. Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), 145–160. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groom, Nicholas. 2009. Phraseology and epistemology in academic book reviews: a corpus-driven analysis of two humanities disciplines. In Academic Evaluation. Review Genres in University Settings, Ken Hyland & Giuliana Diani (eds), 122–139. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo. 2010. Grammar and Disciplinary Culture: A Corpus-based Study. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki. <[URL]>
Hiltunen, Turo & Mäkinen, Martti. 2014. Formulaic language in L2 academic writing for business studies and economics. In Corpus Analysis for Descriptive and Pedagogic Purposes: English Specialised Discourse [Linguistic Insights 200], Maurizio Gotti & Davide Giannoni (eds), 347–360. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2): 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1): 4–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(1): 41–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jemelniak, Dariusz. 2014. Wikipedia, a Professor’s best Friend. Chronicle of Higher Education, 13 Oct 2014.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Reddy, Siva, Pomikálek, Jan & PVS, Avinesh. 2010. A corpus factory for many languages. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis, Mike Rosner & Daniel Tapias (eds), 904–910. Valetta, Malta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konieczny, Piotr. 2014. Rethinking Wikipedia for the Classroom. Contexts 13:1, 80–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuteeva, Maria. 2011. Wikis and academic writing: Changing the writer – reader relationship. English for Specific Purposes 30(1): 44–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Research blogs, Wikis and Tweets. In The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, Phillip Shaw & Ken Hyland (eds.), 431–443. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mäkinen, Martti & Hiltunen, Turo. 2016. Creating a corpus of student writing in economics: structure and representativeness. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora [Language and computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], Maria José López Couso, Bélen Méndez Naya, Paloma Núñez Pertejo & Ignacio Palacios Martínez (eds), 41–58. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 2010. Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, Hilary. 2008. BAWE: An introduction to a new resource. In Proceedings of the 8th Teaching and Language Corpora Conference, Ana Frankenberg-Garcia, Tawfig Rkibi, Maria do Rosario Braga da Cruz, Ricardo Carvalho, Cristina Direito & Diogo Santos-Rosa, 239–246. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Línguas e Administração.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
No original research. Wikipedia. <[URL]> (15 April 2016).
Paquot, Magali & Granger, Sylviane. 2012. Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 130–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2014. Formulaic language in L1 and L2 expert academic writing: Convergent and divergent usage. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 84–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salazar, Danica. 2014. Lexical bundles in Native and Nonnative Writing. Applying a Corpus-based Study to Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H.–J. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaoul, Cyrus & Westbury, Chris. 2010. The Westbury Lab Wikipedia Corpus (2010). Edmonton: University of Alberta. <[URL]>
Simpson-Vlach, Rita & Nick C. Ellis. 2010. An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4): 487–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sosnoski, James J. 1994. Token Professionals and Master Critics: A Critique of Orthodoxy in Literary Studies. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tapscott, Don and Anthony D. Williams. 2010. Macrowikinomics. Rebooting Business and the World. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tribble, Christopher. 2011. Revisiting apprentice texts: Using lexical bundles to investigate expert and apprentice performances in academic writing. In A Taste for Corpora: In Honour of Sylviane Granger [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 45], Fanny Meunier, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Magali Paquot (eds), 85–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waters, Neil L. 2007. Why you can’t cite Wikipedia in my class. Communications of the ACM 50(9): 15–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, Jeffrey R. 2006. Wikipedia founder discourages academic use of his creation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, June 12. <[URL]>
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Yang, Mei
2023. Disciplinary influence on lexical bundle functions: reassessing the paradigm factor. Corpora 18:3 ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Mei
2024. Mapping shared lexical bundles onto rhetorical moves in nursing research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic variation. ICAME Journal 48:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Drury, Brett & Samuel Morais Drury
2022. Lexical Bundle Variation in Business Actors’ Public Communications. In Text, Speech, and Dialogue [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13502], ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue