Cover not available

In:Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics:
Edited by Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82] 2018
► pp. 1–12

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
Present applications and future directions in pattern-driven approaches to corpus linguistics

 | Linnaeus University
 | University of Glasgow
Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.01tyr
Article outline
  • 1.Corpus linguistics today
  • 2.Pattern-driven research into language
  • 3.Book overview
  • 4.Pattern-driven linguistics: Future directions
  • References
References (41)
References
Ädel, Annelie & Erman, Britt. 2012. Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes 31: 81–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1998. On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In Phraseology. Theory, Analysis and Applications, Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), 101–122. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2014. Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries. <[URL]>
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2009. Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buerki, A. 2010. All sorts of change: A preliminary typology of change in multi-word sequences in the Swiss Text Corpus. Presented at FLaRN 2010, Paderborn, Germany.
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. A Comprehensive Guide. Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie. 2007. Concgramming: A corpus-driven approach to learning the phraseology of discipline-specific texts. CORELL: Computer Resources for Language Learning 1: 22–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conklin, Kathy & Schmitt, Norbert. 2008. Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29(1): 72–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana. 2004. Lexical bundles in published and student writing in history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 397–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja. 2002. Lexical bundles in Early Modern English: A window into the speech-related language of the past. In Sounds, Words, Texts, Change. Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (11 ICEHL) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 224], Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya & Elena Seoane (eds), 45–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. A new kind of dictionary for Shakespeare’s plays: An immodest proposal. In Stylistics and Shakespeare’s Language: Transdisciplinary Approaches, Mireille Ravassat & Jonathan Culpeper (eds), 58–83. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fletcher, William H. 2003/2004. Phrases in English. <[URL]> (1 May 2017).
2006. Concordancing the web: Promise and problems, tools and techniques. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web [Language and Computers 59], Marianne Hundt, Nadja Nesselhauf & Carolin Biewer (eds), 25–45. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, Gill, Hunston, Susan & Manning, Elizabeth. 1996. Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns, 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns, 1: Nouns and Adjectives. London HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław. 2011. Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabowski, Łukasz. 2015. Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes 38: 23–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greaves, Christopher & Warren, Martin. 2007. Concgramming: A computer-driven approach to learning the phraseology of English. ReCALL Journal 17(3): 287–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2010. Lexical gravity across varieties of English: An ICE-based study of N-Grams in Asian Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4): 520–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill. 2000. Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna. 2013. The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs. Standardisation and Lexical Bundles, 1380–1560. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja, Rydén, Mats & Smitterberg, Erik. 2006. Nineteenth-century English: Stability and Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaela, González-Díaz, Victorina & Smith, Catherine (eds). 2009. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, Liverpool 20–23 July 2009. <[URL]> (1 May 2017).
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard & Tono, Yukio. 2006. Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. 2014. Corpus-based and corpus-driven approaches to linguistic analysis: one and the same? In Developments in English: Expanding Electronic Evidence, Irma Taavitsainen, Merja Kytö, Claudia Claridge & Jeremy Smith (eds), 14–28. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan & Morley, John. 2004. From frequency to ideology: Investigating word and cluster/bundle frequency in political debate. In Practical Applications in Language and Computers. PALC 2003, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), 179–192. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salazar, Danica. 2014. Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Michael. 1997. PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System 25(1): 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shrefler, Nathan. 2011. Lexical bundles and German bibles. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26(1): 89–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Mauranen, Anna. 2006. Linear Unit Grammar: Integrating Speech and Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2002. Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(2): 215–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi (eds). 2010. Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang. 2005. My version of corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(1): 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, Antoine, Derwing, Bruce, Libben, Gary & Westbury, Chris. 2011. Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning 61(2): 569–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilks, Yorick. 2005. REVEAL: The notion of anomalous texts in a very large corpus. Tuscan Word Centre International Workshop. Certosa di Pontignano, Tuscany, Italy, 31 June–3 July.
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2024. Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective. Research in Language 22:2 ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Lutzky, Ursula
2024. “Doesn’t Really Answer My Question . . .”: Exploring Customer Service Interactions on Twitter. International Journal of Business Communication 61:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Lutzky, Ursula
2024. Crisis Communication at the Intersection of Responsibility and Consumer Engagement Opportunity: A Case Study of Ryanair Tweets During the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Communication in Uncertain Times, ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Jeremy J.
2024. Book Review: Pragmatics in the History of English. Journal of English Linguistics 52:2 ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Nevala, Minna & Jukka Tyrkkö
2023. From criminal lunacy to mental disorder. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111], ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Tyrkkö, Jukka
2019. Kinship references in the British Parliament, 1800–2005. In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 306], ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue