In:Lexical Priming: Applications and advances
Edited by Michael Pace-Sigge and Katie J. Patterson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 79] 2017
► pp. 231–249
Colligational effects of collocation
Lexically-conditioned dependencies between modification patterns of the noun cause
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.79.09can
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.79.09can
Previous research into lexical constellations has uncovered the existence of dependency relations among different collocations of a word (Cantos & Sánchez 2001; Almela 2011; Almela et al. 2011; Almela 2014). Such dependencies are obtained when the strength of the attraction between a node and one or more of its collocates is contingent on their co-occurrence with a third element (a co-collocate). For instance, the probability that face (verb) collocates with decision is increased by the presence of modifiers of a specific semantic type (e.g., hard, difficult, tough) but weakened by the presence of other types of modifiers such as wise, informed, rational, etc. Implications of this phenomenon for the analysis of word meaning and for the notion of ‘collocation’ have been examined in previous studies. With this chapter we attempt to explore the possibility of extending the notion of co-collocation – and the methodology associated with it– to the analysis of some aspects of colligational priming (Hoey 2005). We hypothesize that the strength of attraction between a lexical item and a grammatical slot can be influenced (strengthened or weakened) by the instantiation of other colligations of the same node in the same syntagmatic environment, and that it is possible to capture these dependencies between colligations by adapting the methodology of co-collocation analysis. We are also interested in determining whether these phenomena of dependency interact with collocational primings. The study will be focused on the relationship of particular collocations and syntactic preferences of the noun CAUSE. Using data from a large English web corpus, we will analyze the association between specific collocations of verbs with CAUSE as object and their impact on the co-occurrence probability of two different types of modifiers: premodifiers and of-headed prepositional postmodifiers. The results suggest that the strength of association between these two modifiers in the context of CAUSE is influenced by the type of verbal collocate.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and research questions
- 2.Methodology
- 3.Results and analysis
- 4.Discussion and conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (15)
Almela, M. 2011. Improving corpus-driven methods of semantic analysis: A case study of the collocational profile of ‘incidence’. English Studies 92: 84–99.
. 2014. ‘You shall know a collocation by the company it keeps’: Methodological advances in lexical-constellation analysis. In Investigating Lexis: Vocabulary Teaching, ESP, Lexicography and Lexis Innovation, J.R. Calvo-Ferer & M.A. Campos (eds), 3–26. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Almela, M., Cantos, P. & Sánchez, A. 2011. From collocation to meaning: Revising corpus-based techniques of lexical semantic analysis. In New Approaches to Specialized English Lexicology and Lexicography, I. Balteiro (ed.), 47–64. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Cantos, P. & Sánchez, A. 2001. Lexical constellations: What collocates fail to tell. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6(2): 199–228.
Francis, G. 1993. A corpus-driven approach to grammar: Principles, methods and examples. In Text and Technology, M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 137–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gries, S.T. 2013. 50-something years of work on collocations. What is or should be next. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1): 137–165.
Hunston, S. & Francis, G. 2000. Pattern Grammar. A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mason, O. 2000. Parameters in collocation: The word in the centre of gravity. In Corpora Galore. Analyses and Techniques in Descrbing English, J.M. Kirk (ed.), 267–280. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Patterson, K.J. 2016. The analysis of metaphor: To what extent can the theory of lexical priming help our understanding of metaphor usage and comprehension? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45(2), 237–258.
Rychlý, P. 2008. A lexicographer-friendly association score. In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, P. Sojka & A. Horák (eds), 6–9. Brno: Masaryk University.
Stubbs, M. 1995. Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language 2(1): 23–55.
Tsiamita, F. 2009. Polysemy and lexical priming: The case of drive. In Exploring Lexis-Grammar Interface [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 35], 247–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
López-Solà, Inmaculada & Fernando Lillo-Fuentes
Hoey, Michael & Katie Patterson
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
