Cover not available

In:Lexical Priming: Applications and advances
Edited by Michael Pace-Sigge and Katie J. Patterson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 79] 2017
► pp. 189–229

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Lexical priming and register variation

 | São Paulo Catholic University
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.79.08ber
Lexical priming predicts that repeated encounters with lexical patterns will prime users for register awareness (Hoey 2013: 3344). To verify this prediction, this chapter reports on a study that determined the dimensions of collocation in American English, which are the parameters underlying the use of collocations in spoken and written text. The method was inspired by the multidimensional framework for register variation analysis introduced by Biber in the 1980s. The corpus used was the 450-million-word Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA, 1990–2012 version). The most characteristic collocations of each register in COCA (spoken [American radio and television programs], magazine, newspaper, academic, and fiction) were computed using the logDice coefficient (Rychly 2008). These were then entered in a factor analysis, which yielded the statistical groupings of collocation across the registers. Nine dimensions were identified and are described in this chapter. The relationship between collocation and register was tested statistically through the dimensions, and the results suggested that register could predict the collocations (via the dimensions) between 39% and 67% of the time, which seems to lend support to the hypothesis that users are primed for register, as far as AmE collocations are concerned.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
  • 3.Dimensions of collocation in American English
    • 3.1Dimension 1: Literate discourse
    • 3.2Dimension 2: Oral discourse
    • 3.3Dimension 3: Objects, people, and actions
    • 3.4Dimension 4: Colloquial and informal language use
    • 3.5Dimension 5: Organizations and the government
    • 3.6Dimension 6: Politics and current affairs
    • 3.7Dimension 7: Feelings and emotions
    • 3.8Dimension 8: Cooking
    • 3.9Dimension 9: Education research
  • 4.Assigning collocations to register categories based on their MD profile
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
  • Author query
References (34)
References
Berber Sardinha, T. 1997. Automatic Identification of Segments in Written Texts. PhD dissertation, University of Liverpool.
Berber Sardinha, T., Kauffmann, C. & Acunzo, C.M. 2014. A multdimensional analysis of register variation in Brazilian Portuguese. Corpora 9(2): 239–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., Mayer Acunzo, C. & São Bento Ferreira, T. In press. Dimensions of collocation in Brazilian Portuguese: Exploring the Brazilian Corpus on Sketch Engine. In Essays in Lexical Semantics in Honor of Adam Kilgarriff, M. Diab & A. Villavicencio (eds). Berlin: Springer.
Berber Sardinha, T., São Bento Ferreira, T. & Teixeira, R. d. B.S. 2014. Lexical bundles in Brazilian Portuguese. In Working with Portuguese Corpora, T. Berber Sardinha & T. São Bento Ferreira (eds), 33–68. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T. & Veirano Pinto, M. (eds). 2014. Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Predicting American movie genre categories from linguistic characteristics. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science 2(1): 75–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. In press. American television and off-screen registers: A corpus-based comparison. Corpora.
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. What can a corpus tell us about registers and genres? In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), 241–254. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(1): 9–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S. 1999. Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In Out of Corpora – Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (eds), 181–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J.K. & Tracy-Ventura, N. 2006. Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora 1(1): 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Gray, B. 2013. Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18: 109–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cantos Gómez, P. 2013. Statistical Methods in Language and Linguistic Research. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doise, W., Clemence, A. & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. 1993. The Quantitative Analysis of Social Representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrmann, J.B. & Berber Sardinha, T. (eds). 2015. Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Lexical priming. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, C. Chapelle (ed.), 3342–3347. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehrer, A. 1974. Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. & Tono, Y. 2006. Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menon, S. & Mukundan, J. 2012. Collocations of high frequency noun keywords in prescribed science textbooks. International Education Studies 5(6): 149–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pace-Sigge, M. 2015. The Function and Use of TO and OF in Multi-word Units. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillips, M. 1989. Lexical Structure of Text. Birmingham: ELR, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rychly, P. 2008. A lexicographer-friendly association score. In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2008, P. Sojka & A. Horák (eds), 6–9. Brno: Masaryk University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, H. 1998. Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics 24(1): 97–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2000. Focusing on the text and its key words. In Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective, Vol. 2, L. Burnard & A. McEnery (eds), 103–122. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M. & Jones, S. 1974/1996. English lexical collocations: A study in computational linguistics. In J.M. Sinclair on Lexis and Lexicography, J.A. Foley (ed.), 22–68. Singapore: UniPress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M., Jones, S. & Daley, R. 1970/2004. English Lexical Studies: The OSTI Report,. Ramesh Krishnamurthy (ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 2007. Quantitative data on multi-word sequences in English: the case of the word ‘world’. In Text, Discourse and Corpora, M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs,W. Teubert & (eds), 163–190. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trier, J. 1931. Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes; die Geschichte eines Sprachlichen feldes. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veirano Pinto, M. 2014. Dimensions of variation in North American movies. In Berber Sardinha & Veirano Pinto (eds), 109–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yablo, S. 2016. Aboutness. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Sardinha, Tony Berber & Shannon Fitzsimmons-Doolan
2026. Lexical Multidimensional Analysis, DOI logo
Martínez Caro, Elena
2024. Paragraph boundaries and discourse genre: Applying Lexical Priming to Spanish written texts. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 99 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Ortolani, Katherine O.
2024. The Language of Fashion from a Multidimensional Perspective. In Digital Humanities Looking at the World, ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Hoey, Michael & Katie Patterson
2021. Lexical Priming. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Jeaco, Stephen
2021. Exploring register withThe Prime Machine. Register Studies 3:2 ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Zuppardi, Maria Carolina & Tony Berber Sardinha
2020. A multi-dimensional view of collocations in academic writing. In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95], ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Sardinha, Tony Berber
2019. Lexicogrammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pace-Sigge, Michael
2018. Where Corpus Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Meet. In Spreading Activation, Lexical Priming and the Semantic Web, ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue