Cover not available

In:Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston
Edited by Nicholas Groom, Maggie Charles and Suganthi John
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 73] 2015
► pp. 117–144

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 5. Examining associations between lexis and textual position in hard news stories, or according to a study by…

 | University of Liverpool
 | University of Pennsylvania
Published online: 30 October 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.73.06hoe
It is claimed within the theory of lexical priming that text-linguistic phenomena are as deeply involved in our lexical primings as are more obvious phenomena such as collocations. One of the textual claims is that people are primed to associate certain words or phrases with certain recognised discourse positions in particular genres and/or domains (an association referred to as textual colligation). One kind of textual colligation is hypothesised to be the psychological association that a language user makes in a genre between a word or phrase and text-initial position. This paper seeks to demonstrate that it is possible to use the Key Words procedure implemented in WordSmith Tools not only to identify over 1000 words with strong text-initial associations in hard news data but also to examine the way in which phrases or clusters of words also may have textual priming. In particular we focus on one three word lexical cluster which suggests how lexis and textual position interact. We conclude that our findings are fully compatible with Lexical Priming theory, even though they cannot directly be used as evidence for it. The paper also makes use of a number of novel or under-used methodological strategies, including the utilisation of complete texts as a unit of analysis, the creation of positional subcorpora, the use of key words to identify candidates for textual colligation, the comparison of an item’s behaviour in a subcorpus with its behavior in other subcorpora derived from the same texts (following Gledhill, 2000), the extension of key word procedure to collocate tables (key collocates) and the investigation of textual semantic association and textual collocation using concordance line grouping.
References (44)
References
Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S. (eds). 2000. Usage Based Models of Language. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A. 1991. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2010. Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds). 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, D.A. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csomay, E. & Cortes, V. 2010. Lexical bundle distribution in university lectures. In Corpus Linguistic Applications: Current Studies, New Directions, S.T. Gries, S. Wulff & M. Davies (eds), 153-168. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneš, F. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, F. Daneš (ed.), 106-128. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firbas, J. 1986. On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of Functional Sentence Perspective. In Studying Writing: Linguistic approaches, C.R. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (eds), 40-71. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K.I. & Davis, C. 1984. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10: 680-698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, G., Hunston, S. & Manning, E. 1996. Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns, 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns, 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fries, P.H. 1994. On Theme, Rheme and discourse goals. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, M. Coulthard (ed.), 229-249. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gledhill, C. 2000. Collocations in Science Writing. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. with Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. 2004. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. 1991. Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Textual colligation: a special kind of lexical priming. In Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Papers from ICAME 23, Götenborg 22-26 May 2002 (The Theory and Use of Corpora), Aijmer, K. & Altenberg, B (eds), 171-194. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Corpus-driven approaches to grammar: The search for common ground. In Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 35], U. Rmer & R. Schulze (eds), 33-47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 33-47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. & O’Donnell, M.B. 2007. Death to the topic sentence: How we really paragraph. In Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Symposium on English Teaching, Y.-N. Leung (ed.), 60-76. Taipei: English Teachers’ Association/ROC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. & O’Donnell, M.B. 2008a. The beginning of something important? Corpus evidence on the text beginnings of hard news stories. In PALC 2007 (Practical Applications In Language Corpora: 7) Studies in Language, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), 189-212. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Hoey, M. & O’Donnell, M.B. 2008b. Lexicography, grammar, and textual position. International Journal of Lexicography 21(3): 293-309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S & Francis, G. 1999. Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacoby L.L & Dallas, M. 1981. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 110: 306-40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiper, K. & Haggo, D. 1984. Livestock auctions, oral poetry, and ordinary language. Language in Society 13: 205-34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McRae, K. & Boisvert, S. 1998. Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24(3): 558-572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. 2009. Local textual functions of move in newspaper story patterns. In Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 35], U. Rmer & R. Schulze (eds), 265-287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins & (eds), 265–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. & O’Donnell, M.B. 2008. A fresh view of the structure of hard news stories. In Online Proceedings of the 19th European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference and Workshop, Saarbrücken, 23-25 July 2007, S. Neumann & E. Steiner (eds.). URN: <[URL] URL: <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, D.E. & Schvaneveldt, R.W. 1971. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 90: 227-234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, M.B. 2008. KWICgrouper: Designing a tool for corpus-driven concordance analysis. In Software-aided Analysis of Language: Special Issue of International Journal of English Studies 8(1): 107-122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, M.B. & Römer, U. In preparation. Positional variation of n-grams and phrase-frames in a new corpus of proficient student writing.
O’Donnell, M.B., Scott, M., Mahlberg, M. & Hoey, M. 2012. Exploring text-initial Concgrams in a newspaper corpus. Special issue of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(1): 73-101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C., Bagoutdinov, A. & O’Donnell, M.B. 2011. Windows on the mind: Pauses in conversational narrative. Special issue of International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(2): 198–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scarborough, D.L., Cortese, C. & Scarborough, H. 1977. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3: 1-17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. 1997. PC Analysis of keywords—and key key words. System 25(1): 1-13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. WordSmith Tools Version 5.0. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. & Tribble, C. 2006. Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shelton, J.R. & Martin, R.C. 1992. How semantic is automatic semantic priming? A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review 81: 214-241.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M. 2004. Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, P.R.R. 1997. Death, disruption and the moral order: The narrative impulse in mass-media “hard news” reporting. In Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, F. Christie & J.R. Martin (eds), 101–133. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Gries, Stefan Th.
2025. Cultural Keywords in Varieties Research. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science DOI logo
Groom, Nicholas
2019. Construction Grammar and the corpus-based analysis of discourses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Dong, Jihua & Louisa Buckingham
2018. The textual colligation of stance phraseology in cross-disciplinary academic discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4 ► pp. 408 ff. DOI logo
Barlow, Michael
2016.  WordSkew . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue