In:Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston
Edited by Nicholas Groom, Maggie Charles and Suganthi John
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 73] 2015
► pp. 43–72
Chapter 2. Using COBUILD grammar patterns for a large-scale analysis of verb-argument constructions
Exploring corpus data and speaker knowledge
Published online: 30 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.73.03rom
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.73.03rom
This paper takes patterns identified in COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs (Francis et al. 1996) as a starting point for the systematic, large-scale analysis of English verb-argument constructions (VACs), using both corpus/computational methods and psycholinguistic experiments. We work in an iterative cycle to define, search, review and refine patterns to retrieve VACs from a parsed version of the BNC and examine the distributions of the verb types and their token frequencies for each VAC. The findings allow us to make predictions regarding language users’ knowledge of verbs in constructions. We then test these predictions in psycholinguistic experiments, in which native and non-native speakers of English think of the first word that comes to mind to fill the V slot in a particular VAC frame. We compare the results from the experiments and the corpus analysis in terms of verb selection preferences. This research demonstrates the productive synergy of corpus linguistic and psycholinguistic methods and findings.
References (25)
Andersen, Ø., Nioche, J., Briscoe, E.J. & Carroll, J. 2008. The BNC Parsed with RASP4UIMA. Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC08), 28-30.
Briscoe, E.J., Carroll, J. & Watson, R. 2006. The Second Release of the RASP System. Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Interactive Presentation Sessions, Sydney, Australia, 77-80.
Ellis, N.C. & Ferreira-Junior, F. 2009. Constructions and their acquisition:Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 111-139.
Ellis, N.C., O’Donnell, M.B. & Römer, U. 2013. Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning.63(Supp. 1):25–51. Doi:
. 2014. The processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Cognitive Linguistics 25(1): 55-98.
Ellis, N.C., Simpson-Vlach, R. & Maynard, C. 2008. Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 42(3): 375-396.
Francis, G., Hunston, S. & Manning, E. 1996. Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns, 1: Verbs. London: Harper Collins.
Goldberg, A.E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 219-224.
Goldberg, A.E., Casenhiser, D.M. & Sethuraman, N. 2004. Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 289-316.
Hoffmann, S., Evert, S., Smith, N., Lee, D. & Berglund Prytz, Y. 2008. Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb - A Practical Guide [English Corpus Linguistics 6]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Hunston, S. & Francis, G. 1999. Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jurafsky, D. 2003. Probabilistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In Probabilistic Linguistics, R. Bod, J. Hay & S. Jannedy (eds), 39-96. Harvard MA: The MIT Press.
Mason, O. & Hunston, S. 2004. The automatic recognition of verb patterns: A feasibility study. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9: 253-270.
Mukherjee, J.. 2009. The lexicogrammar of present-day Indian English:Corpus-based perspectives on structural nativisation. In Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 35], U. Römer & R. Schulze (eds), 117-135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
O’Donnell, M.B., Ellis, N.C. & Corden, G. 2012. Exploring semantics in verb argument constructions using community identification algorithms. Paper presented at the Language & Network Symposium: The International Conference on Network Science NETSCI 2012.
Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S. & Michelizzi, J. 2004. WordNet::Similarity –Measuring the relatedness of concepts.
Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics (NAACL 2004)
, 38-41.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Callies, Marcus
Kyle, Kristopher & Masaki Eguchi
Gedik, Tan Arda
Huang, Yan, Akira Murakami, Theodora Alexopoulou & Anna Korhonen
2021. Subcategorization frame identification for learner English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Yan, Hengbin & Yinghui Li
Yan, Hengbin & Yinghui Li
Groom, Nicholas
2019. Construction Grammar and the corpus-based analysis of discourses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 291 ff.
Perek, Florent
Kyle, Kristopher & Scott Crossley
ELLIS, NICK C.
Ellis, Nick C.
2016. On-line processing of verb-argument constructions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Römer, Ute
Ellis, Nick C., Matthew B. O’Donnell & Ute Römer
2014.
Second language verb-argument constructions are sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4:4 ► pp. 405 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
