Cover not available

In:Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment
Edited by Marcus Callies and Sandra Götz
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 70] 2015
► pp. 110

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (24)
References
Barker, F. 2010. How can corpora be used in language testing? In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), 633–645. New York NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Corpus-based testing. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, C.A. Chapelle (ed.), 1360–1366. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Advancing the research agenda of Interlanguage Pragmatics: The role of learner corpora. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013: New Domains and Methodologies, J. Romero-Trillo (ed.), 9–36. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. To appear. Using learner corpora in language testing and assessment: Current practice and future challenges. In Studies in Learner Corpus Linguistics: Research and Applications for Foreign Language Teaching and Assessment, E. Castello, K. Ackerley & F. Coccetta (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Callies, M., Díez-Bedmar, M.B. & Zaytseva, E. 2014. Using learner corpora for testing and assessing L2 proficiency. In Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA, P. Leclercq, H. Hilton & A. Edmonds (eds), 71–90. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chapelle, C.A. & Plakans, L. 2013. Assessment and testing: Overview. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, C.A. Chapelle (ed.), 241–244. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlsen, C. 2012. Proficiency level – A fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora. Applied Linguistics 33(2): 161–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cock, S. 2004. Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures, New Series 2: 225–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., DeCock, S. & Granger, S. 2010. The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M. 2009. The International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. 2006. Exploring variability within and between corpora: Some methodological considerations. Corpora 1(2): 109–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkey, R. & Barker, F. 2004. Developing a common scale for the assessment of writing. Assessing Writing 9: 122–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.A. & Buttery, P. 2010. Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal 1(1): 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. & Filipović, L. 2012. Criterial Features in L2 English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leclercq, P., Hilton, H. & Edmonds, A. (eds). 2014. Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. 2013. Putting the CEFR to good use: Designing grammars based on learner-corpus evidence. Language Teaching. FirstView , (12 July 2014). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J. 2009. The grammar of conversation in advanced spoken learner English: Learner corpus data and language-pedagogical implications. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], K. Aijmer (ed.), 203–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H. 2008. The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities: An introduction. In The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities, L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (eds), 3–20. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, M. 1994. Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning 44(2): 307–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. In Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 13], J.M. Norris & L. Ortega (eds), 279–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y. & Minegishi, M. (eds). 2012. Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Qu, Shanshan & Silvia Scolaro
2025. NOUN PHRASES IN THE INTERLANGUAGE OF CHINESE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS LEARNING ITALIAN AS A SECOND FOREIGN LANGUAGE: A CORPUS STUDY. Italiano LinguaDue 16:2  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Stumpf, Elisa Marchioro, Juliana Schoffen, Luiza Sarmento Divino, Isadora Dahmer Hanauer, Amanda Raupp & Brenda Xavier
2025. Anais do XVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Tecnologia da Informação e da Linguagem Humana (STIL 2025),  pp. 673 ff. DOI logo
Gablasova, Dana, Luke Harding, Vaclav Brezina & Jamie Dunlea
2024. Expressions of epistemic stance in computer-mediated L2 speaking assessment. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 10:1  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Götz, Sandra & Sylviane Granger
2024. Learner corpus research for pedagogical purposes. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 10:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Vakhranev, A. Y.
2024. Assessment of the Reliability of Lexical Lists for Automated Evaluation of Proficiency in Russian as a Foreign Language. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 22:3  pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Schoffen, Juliana & Luiza Divino
2023. Contribuição da Linguística de Corpus para a formação de professores de PLA. Letras de Hoje 58:1  pp. e44904 ff. DOI logo
Diao, Wenhao & Chen Chen
2022. L2 use of pragmatic markers in peer talk: Mandarin utterance-final particles. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4  pp. 1293 ff. DOI logo
Kisselev, Olesya, Aleksandr Klimov & Mihail Kopotev
2022. Syntactic complexity measures as linguistic correlates of proficiency level in learner Russian. In Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 104],  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Wisniewski, Katrin
2017. Empirical Learner Language and the Levels of theCommon European Framework of Reference. Language Learning 67:S1  pp. 232 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue