Cover not available

In:Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning
Edited by Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska and Alex Boulton
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 69] 2015
► pp. 177–198

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Exploiting keywords in a DDL approach to the comprehension of news texts by lower-level students

 | University of Extremadura
Published online: 13 May 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.69.09cur
This study describes the influence of an explicit focus on keywords in news texts for classroom activities on reading comprehension of news items. The general objective was to examine whether exploiting keywords through various tasks can aid learners in subsequent decoding of information in a text. The specific objective was to conduct a study with business English students at B1 level in which electronic data-driven learning (DDL) is compared with more conventional paper-based activities. The experimental DDL group exploited KWIC concordances of news keywords, while the other group read and answered reading comprehension exercises targeting the same items. Pre-tests and post-tests were used to compare the progress of the two groups, while direct observation, logs and questionnaires provided further insight. From the test results and the participants’ feedback, DDL activities focusing on news keywords seem to work favorably for the students’ comprehension of news.
References (52)
References
Allen, D. 2009. A study of the role of relative clauses in the simplification of news texts for learners of English. System 37: 585–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, V.K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. 2003. Compressed noun-phrase structures in newspaper discourse. In New Media Language, J. Aitchison & D.M. Lewis (eds), 169–182. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boulton, A. 2010a. Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning 60(3): 534–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. Learning outcomes from corpus consultation. In Exploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy: Lexis and Corpus-based Language Teaching, M. Moreno Jaén, F. Serrano Valverde, & M. Calzada Pérez (eds), 129–144. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Beyond concordancing: Multiple affordances of corpora in university language degrees. Elsevier Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 34: 33–38. <[URL]> (13 February 2014). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowles, H. 1995. Why are newspaper law reports so hard to understand? English for Specific Purposes 14(3): 201–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brill, E. 2011. POS-Tagger. Center for Sprogteknologi. <[URL]> (20 August 2013)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burnard, L. & McEnery, T. 1999. The BNC Sampler. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cantos Gómez, P. 2013. Statistical Methods in Language and Linguistic Research. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, A. 2005. Integrating corpus consultation in language studies. Language Learning & Technology 9(2): 111–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles, M. 2011. Using hands-on concordancing to teach rhetorical functions: Evaluation and implications for EAP writing classes. In New Trends in Corpora and Language Learning, A. Frankenberg-Garcia, L. Flowerdew & G. Aston (eds), 26–43. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, W. 2009. Income/interest/net: Using internal criteria to determine the aboutness of a text. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], K. Aijmer (ed.), 157–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, W., Warren, M. & Xun-feng, X. 2003. The language learner as language researcher: Putting corpus linguistics on the timetable. System 31(2): 173–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2003. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge: CUP. <[URL]> (15 February 2014).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curado Fuentes, A. 2002. Exploitation and assessment of a business English corpus through language learning tasks. ICAME Journal 26: 5–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The use of corpora and IT in evaluating oral task competence for tourism English. CALICO Journal 22(1): 5–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. A corpus-based assessment of reading comprehension in English. In Corpora in the Foreign Language Classroom, E. Hidalgo, L. Quereda & J. Santana (eds), 309–326. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. 2000. User-friendly communication skills in teaching and learning of business English. English for Specific Purposes 19(4): 331–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuertes-Olivera, P.A. & Piqué-Noguera, C. 2010. The literal translation hypothesis in ESP teaching/learning environments. ScriptaManent 8(1): 15–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavioli, L. 2006. Exploring Corpora for ESP Learning [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 21]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Corpus analysis and the achievement of learner autonomy in interaction. In Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse, L. Lombardo (ed.), 39–72. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. 2001. Colligation, lexis, pattern and text. In Patterns of Text: In honour of Michael Hoey, M. Scott & G. Thompson (eds), 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyon, S. 2001. Long-term effects of genre-based instruction: A follow-up study of an EAP reading course. English for Specific Purposes 20(1): 417–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilangakoon, S.R. 2012. Identifying threshold vocabulary for academic study. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences 8: 141–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johns, T. 1976. The communicative approach to language teaching in the framework of a programme of English for academic purposes. In L’Enseignement de la Compétence de Communication en Langues Secondes, E. Roulet & H. Holec (eds), 94–112. Neuchâtel: Institut de Linguistique de l’Université de Neuchâtel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Whence and whither classroom concordancing? In Computer Applications in Language Learning, P. Bongaerts, P. de Haan, S. Lobbe & H. Wekker (eds), 9–27. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Data-driven learning: The perpetual challenge. In Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis, B. Kettemann & G. Marko (eds), 107–118. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, N. & Yu, Q. 2011. Corpus-based stylistic analysis of tourism English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 2(1): 129–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreyer, R. 2008. Corpora in the classroom and beyond. In Handbook of Research on Computer-enhanced Language Acquisition and Learning, F. Zhang & B. Barber (eds), 422–437. Hershey: Information Science Reference. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombardo, L. 2009. Introduction: Establishing guidelines for the use of corpora as resources for learners. In Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse, L. Lombardo (ed.), 7–38. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrow, P.R. 1989. Conjunct use in business news stories and academic journal articles: A comparative study. English for Specific Purposes 8(3): 239–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murison-Bowie, S. 1993. MicroConcord Handbook and MicroConcord Corpus A and B. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. 2004. The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. Canadian Modern Language Review 61: 107–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, M. 2006. Semantic associations in business English: A corpus-based analysis. English for Specific Purposes 25: 217–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Basanta, C. 1996. La integración de los contenidos léxicos en los métodos comunicativos: Una cuestión pendiente. In Segundas Jornadas sobre Estudio y Enseñanza del Léxico, L. Durán & P. Beltrán (eds), 229–310. Granada: Método.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Assessing the receptive vocabulary of Spanish students of English philology: An empirical investigation. In Towards an Understanding of the English Language, Past, Present and Future: Studies in Honour of Fernando Serrano, E. Martínez-Dueñas (ed.), 545–564. Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, P. 2003. Small corpora as assisting tools in the teaching of English news language: A preliminary tokens-based examination of Michael Swan’s ‘Practical English Usage’ news language wordlist. ESP World Journal 2(3). <[URL]> (20 November 2013).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanderson, P. 1999. Using Newspapers in the Classroom. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott. M. 1997. PC analysis of key words and key key words. System 25: 233–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2000a. Focusing on the text and its key words. In Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective, L. Burnard & T. McEnery (eds), 103–122. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000b. Reverberations of an echo. In PALC’99: Practical Applications in Language Corpora, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & P.J. Melia (eds), 49–68. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000c. WordSmith Tools 3.0. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Mapping keywords to problem and solution . In Patterns of Text: In Honour of Michael Hoey, M. Scott & G. Thompson (eds), 109–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Picturing the key words of a very large corpus and their lexical upshots, or getting the Guardian’s view of the world. In Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis, B. Kettemann & G. Marko (eds), 43–50. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Problems in investigating keyness, or clearing the undergrowth and marking out trails. In Keyness in Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 41], M. Bondi & M. Scott (eds), 43–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. & Tribble, C. 2006. Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smart, J. 2014. The role of guided induction in paper-based data-driven learning. ReCALL 26(2): 184–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 2010. Three concepts of keywords. In Keyness in Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 41], M. Bondi & M. Scott (eds), 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verifica Report. 2008. Informe Verifica del Grado de Administración y Empresa. Extremadura: Universidad de Extremadura. ANECA. <[URL]> (8 June 2014).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G. 2003. Defining Issues in English Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Charles, Maggie
2025. Learner Autonomy and Data-Driven Learning. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Computer-Assisted Language Learning, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zare, Javad & Khadijeh Aqajani Delavar
2024. Enhancing English learning materials with data-driven learning: a mixed-methods study of task motivation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45:9 ► pp. 4011 ff. DOI logo
LEE, HANSOL, MARK WARSCHAUER & JANG HO LEE
2020. Toward the Establishment of a Data‐Driven Learning Model: Role of Learner Factors in Corpus‐Based Second Language Vocabulary Learning. The Modern Language Journal 104:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue