In:Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 221–246
May and might in nineteenth century Irish English and English English
Published online: 24 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.10hat
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.10hat
This paper discusses the use of may and might in 19th century Irish English and English English. It builds on Van Hattum (2012a), which found that in 18th and 19th century Irish English might Vinf was used in contexts requiring may/might have Ven in present-day English. This paper aims to find out if this development is due to regional or diachronic variation via a corpus-based study of these modals in 19th century Irish English and English English. The data shows no change in objective possibility contexts, but in subjective possibility contexts might loses the ability to signal past time, and thus requires a perfect to create a back-shifted interpretation of the proposition. Though the data show some small differences between Irish English and English English, generally it seems that the change identified in Van Hattum (2012a) is due to diachronic variation. Keywords: may, might, Irish English, 18th century, 19th century
References (36)
Condoravdi, Cleo. 2002. Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and past. In Construction of Meaning, David I. Beaver, Luis D. Casillas Martínez, Bradley Z. Clark & Stefan Kaufmann (eds), 59–88. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2008. On the temporal syntax of non-root modals. In Time and Modality, Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarne (eds), 79–113. Berlin: Springer. <[URL]> (5 August 2011)
Denison, David. 1991. Counterfactual may have
. In Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change, Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds), 229–256. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dennett, Maurice. 1990. The Cherry Valley Chronicles. Letters from Thomas Buckley of Massachusetts to Ralph Buckley of Saddleworth 1845-1875. Saddleworth: Saddleworth Historical Society.
Dollinger, Stefan. 2008. New-Dialect Formation in Canada. Evidence from the English Modal Auxiliaries [Studies in Language Companion Series 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Facchinetti, Roberta. 2003. Pragmatic and sociological constraints on the functions of ‘may’ in contemporary British English. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank R. Palmer (eds), 301–327. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Filppula, Markku. 1999. The Grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.
Fitzpatrick, David. 1994. Oceans of Consolation: Personal Accounts of Irish Migration to Australia. Cork: Cork University Press.
Hitchcock, Tim, Shoemaker, Robert, Emsley, Clive, Howard, Sharon & McLaughlin, Jamie, et al. 2012. The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674-1913, Version 7.0. <[URL]> (24 March 2012).
Huber, Magnus. 2007. The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1674-1834. Evaluating and Annotating a Corpus of 18th- and 19th-century Spoken English. Varieng 1. <[URL]> (20 March 2010).
Huber, Magnus, Nissel, Magnus, Maiwald, Patrick & Widlitzki, Bianca. 2012. The Old Bailey Corpus. Spoken English in the 18th and 19th centuries. <[URL]> (4 July 2013).
Kirk, John M. & Kallen, Jeffrey L. 2008. ICE-Ireland. Belfast: Queen’s University Belfast & Dublin: Trinity College Dublin and Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.
McCafferty, Kevin & Amador-Moreno, Carolina P. Under construction. Corpus of Irish English Correspondence (CORIECOR). Bergen, Norway.
McFadden, Thomas & Alexiadou, Artemis. 2010. Perfects, resultatives, and auxiliaries in Earlier English. Linguistic Inquiry 41(3): 389–425.
Mezhevich, Ilana. 2008. A time-relational approach to tense and mood. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics. Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds), 326–334. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Ó Siadhail, Mícheál. 1989. Modern Irish. Grammatical Structure and Dialectal Variation. Cambridge: CUP.
OED Online. 2012. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: OUP. <[URL]> (22 May 2014).
Sedgefield, Walter J. (ed.). 1900. King Alfred’s Version of the Consolations of Boethius. Done into Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2000. The grammaticalization of the present perfect. Tracks of change and continuity in a linguistic enclave. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 329–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1972. The History of English Syntax. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
. 2006. Historical aspects of modality. In The Expression of Modality, William Frawley, Erin Eschenroeder, Sarah Mills & Thao Nguyen (eds), 106–139. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2:79–124.
Van Hattum, Marije. 2012a. “A cannot get a loan for more than six years now”. The relationship between modal verbs and past time reference in Irish English. In New Perspectives on Irish English [Varieties of English around the World G44], Bettina Migge & Máire Ní Chiosáin (eds), 131–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2012b. Irish English Modal Verbs from the Fourteenth to the Twentieth Centuries. PhD dissertation, The University of Manchester.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
