Cover not available

In:Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 205–220

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The evolution of epistemic marking in West Australian English

 | The University of Western Australia
Published online: 24 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.09rod
Across English varieties, frequent subject + epistemic/evidential verb constructions have been reanalysed as formulaic stance markers capable of introducing an embedded clause in the absence of that. I think has grammaticalised further and can occur in a syntactically parenthetical location in an utterance as an ‘epistemic parenthetical’. This chapter explores the emergence of grammatical constraints on think usage in a collection of State Library of Western Australia oral histories. The corpus features 39 speakers of Anglo-Celtic Australian English born between 1874 and 1983. Findings indicate that it is not until the late 20th century that parenthetical I think emerges as a grammatically entrenched variable with pragmatic functions involving the expression of opinion and the mitigation of negative judgement. Keywords: epistemic; evidential; think; Australian English; parenthetical
References (37)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. I think – an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan &Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3): 569–606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael. 2001. The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2): 97–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1993. Pragmaticalization: The case of ba and you know [Studier I Modern Språkvetenskap, New series 10, Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. 76–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic Change. Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. 1988. Advanced Varbrul analysis. In Linguistic Change and Contact, Kathleen Ferrara, Becky Brown, Keith Walters & John Baugh (eds), 124–136. Austin TX: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israel, Michael. 2004. The pragmatics of polarity. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Lawrence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 701–723. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2013. Development of comment clauses. In The English Verb Phrase: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds), 286–317. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The role of I guess in conversational stancetaking. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], Robert Englebretson (ed.), 183–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Position and scope of epistemic phrases in planned and unplanned American English. In New Approaches to Hedging, Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds), 207–241. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate. 2007. Epistemic verbs and zero complementizer. English Language and Linguistics 11(3): 475–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2): 344–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palander-Collins, Mina. 1999a. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999b. Male and female styles in 17th century correspondence: I THINK. Language Variation and Change 11: 123–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Tagliamonte, Sali. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste & Harris, Thomas. 2013. Evolution with an attitude: The grammaticalisation of epistemic/evidential verbs in Australian English. English Language and Linguistics 17(3): 415–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste & Ritz, Marie-Eve. 2014. Stories down under: Tense variation at the heart of Australian English narratives. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(4): 540–556.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2002. Comparative sociolinguistics. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 729–763. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Smith, Jennifer. 2005. No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics 9: 289–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra & Mulac, Anthony. 1991a. The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 237–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991b. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers, [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Walker, James. 2009. On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas. Linguistics 47: 1–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, Deiter Stein & Wright, Susan (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2006. I guess, I suppose and I believe as pragmatic markers: Grammaticalization and functions. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures 4: 129–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: Accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14(3): 399–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Herk, Gerard. 2012. What is Sociolinguistics? Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2006. English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Collins, Peter & Xinyue Yao
2019. AusBrown: A new diachronic corpus of Australian English. ICAME Journal 43:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue