In:Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 179–204
Dual adverbs in Australian English
Published online: 24 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.08pet
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.08pet
Dual or dual-form adverbs are those found with and without the -ly suffix in modern English (e.g. deep/deeply), providing alternative forms for adverbial constituents or modifiers within the clause. But research on British English has shown decreasing numbers of fully interchangeable pairs. This paper investigates five dual adverbs in 19th and 20th century Australian English, examining their syntactic behaviour in writing as well as transcribed speech and scripted dialogue. Parallel data from the Australian and British ICE corpora, as well as custom-built mini-corpora of 19th century Australian and British English (news and narrative texts) are compared, showing far more zero forms in 19th century Australian data than a century later, and lower levels of use altogether in the British data. Keywords: dual adverbs; zero adverb; -ly adverb; Australian English; British English
References (35)
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Denison, David. 2010. Category change in English with and without structural change. In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 105–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Görlach, Manfred. 1987. Colonial lag? The alleged conservative character of American English and other ‘colonial’ varieties. English World-Wide 8(1): 41–60.
Greenough, James & Kittredge, George. 1901. Words and Their Ways in English Speech. New York NY: Macmillan.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin. 2012. World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leonard, Sterling. 1962. The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage 1700-1800. New York NY: Russell & Russell.
Lowth, Robert. 1762[2010]. A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London, printed for A. Miller and R. & J. Dodsley. Reprinted Gale Ecco, Print Editions.
Marckwardt, Albert & Walcott, Fred. 1938. Facts about Current Usage. New York NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Mittins, William, Salu, Mary, Edminson, Mary & Coyne, Sheila. 1970. Attitudes to English Usage. London: OUP.
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1994. Diachronic issues in English adverb derivation. In Creating and Using English Language Corpora, Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie & Peter Schneider (eds), 139–147. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
. 1997. The processes of adverb derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English. In Grammaticalization at Work, Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkonen (eds), 145–189. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Opdahl, Lisa. 1991. -
ly as adverbial suffix: Corpus and elicitation material compared. ICAME Journal 15: 19–35.
. 2000. LY or zero suffix? A Study in Variation of Dual-form Adverbs in Present-day English, Vols. 1 & 2. Bern: Peter Lang.
Peters, Pam. 1999.
Paradigm split
. In Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds), 301–312. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
. 2009. Australian English as regional epicentre. In World Englishes – Problems, Properties and Prospects [Varieties of English around the World G40], Thomas Hoffmann & Lucia Siebers (eds), 107–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2014. Australian narrative voices and the colloquial element in nineteenth century written registers. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(1): 100–117.
Peters, Pam & Collins, Peter. 2012. Colloquial Australian English. In World Atlas of Varieties of English, Bernd Kortmann & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds), 585–595. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Tagliamonte, Sali & Ito, Rika. 2002. Thinking really different: Continuity and specialization in English dual form adverbs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(2): 236–266.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
