Cover not available

In:Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 147–178

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Passives of so-called ‘ditransitives’ in nineteenth century and present-day Canadian English

 | University of Kiel
Published online: 24 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.07mey
This study focuses on the double-participant verbs assign, bring, deny, give, grant, offer, send, serve, sell, show and teach, and the competition between first passives (He was offered the job), second passives (The job was offered him) and passives with a prepositional complement (The job was offered to him) in matching corpora of 19th century and Present-day Canadian English. The verbs display individual preferences for the first passive and the prepositional construction and the acceptability of their second passives also varies. All in all, the 19th century corpus reveals a clear dominance of passives with a prepositional complement over first passives, whereas the reverse is the case in the contemporary corpus. The second passive is shown to have been a minority form already in the 19th century and to be even rarer today. Keywords: Canadian English; passivisation; ditransitives; 19th century
References (34)
References
Aarts, Flor & Aarts, Jan. 1982. English Syntactic Structures: Functions and Categories in Sentence Analysis. New York NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1996. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 25(3): 333–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basilico, David. 2008. Particle verbs and benefactive double objects in English: High and low attachments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26(4): 731–773. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl. 1962. Die Englische Sprache II. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Suzanne Romaine (ed), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerwin, Johanna. 2014. Ditransitives in British English Dialects. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Larisa Oldireva. 2006. The passive in nineteenth-century scientific writing. In Nineteenth-Century English: Stability and Change, Merja Kytö, Mats Ryden & Erik Smitterberg (eds), 110–135. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haddican, William. 2010. Theme-goal ditransitives and theme passivisation in British English dialects. Lingua 120(10): 2424–2443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, John. 1864. A Grammar of the English Language. Philadelphia PA: E.H. Butler & Co. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, Heath, David, Roe, Ian & Götz, Dieter. 2004. A Valency Dictionary of English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, Svenja. 2013. The Complements of Clausal Idioms and Collocations Governed by Get, Give, Hold, Make and Take as Test Cases for Syntactic Theory. BA Thesis, University of Kiel.
Jespersen, Otto. 1961 [1927]. Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part III: Syntax, Second Volume. London: George Allen & Unwin (reprint of first edition by Ejnar Munksgaard, Copenhagen).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirchner, Gustav. 1936. The verbs with direct and indirect object re-examined. English Studies 18: 1–16, 206–222 (published in two sections). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1937. The verbs with direct and indirect object re-examined: Conclusion. English Studies 19: 97–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kläber, Friedrich. 1950. Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Health.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maitland, Frederic W. 1906. The Life and Letters of Leslie Stephen. London: Duckworth. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Matthias L.G. 2009. Revisiting the evidence for objects in English. In Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 37], Ute Römer & Rainer Schulze (eds), 211–227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 12 Jan. 2012. Passivisable-Object Theory and Canadian English. <[URL]> (27 July 2013).
Onions, Charles T. 1904. An Advanced English Syntax. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2007. Functional constraints in syntactic change: The rise and fall of prepositional constructions in Early and Late Modern English. English Studies 88(3): 217–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009a. Nominal complements. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 194–211. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Grammatical divergence between British and American English in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In Current Issues in Late Modern English, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim Van der Wurff (eds), 301–329. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Eine Sprache, zwei Grammatiken? In Sprachmythen: Fiktion oder Wirklichkeit?, Lieselotte Anderwald (ed.), 139–160. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2013. Varieties of English: A Typological Approach. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas & Leech, Geoffrey. 2013. Verb structures in twentieth-century British English. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds), 68–98. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara M.H. 1970. A History of English. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1898. A New English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus. 1963. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part I: Syntactical Units with One Verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part III, second half: Syntactical Units with Two and More Verbs. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue