Cover not available

In:Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber
Edited by Viviana Cortes and Eniko Csomay
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66] 2015
► pp. 49–78

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

On the complexity of academic writing

Disciplinary variation and structural complexity

ORCiD logo with link
Published online: 14 January 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.03gra
Building upon renewed research on the pervasive phrasal or nominal style of academic writing, I investigate the use of phrasal compression and clausal elaboration structures in research articles across six academic disciplines. Results indicate that all disciplines rely on phrasal complexity features to a much greater extent than clausal features. However, these results also show systematic patterns of variation across disciplines, with hard sciences (physics, biology) exhibiting the densest use of phrasal features, followed by social sciences (applied linguistics, political science), and then humanities disciplines (history, philosophy). Furthermore, the patterns for clausal features displayed the opposite trend: most frequent in humanities and least frequent in hard sciences. Keywords: Complexity; clausal elaboration; phrasal compression; disciplinary writing; informational discourse; research articles
References (52)
References
Afros, Elena & Schryer, Catherine. 2009. Promotional (meta)discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes 28: 58-68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aktas, Rahime & Cortes, Viviana. 2008. Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 3-14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banks, David. 2005. On the historical origins of nominalized process in scientific text. English for Specific Purposes 24: 347-357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The Development of Scientific Writing: Linguistic Features and Historical Context. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992/2001. On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, 15, 133-163. Reprinted in In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 215-240. London: Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Clark, Victoria. 2002. Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: How long can you go without a verb? In English Historical Syntax and Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223], Teresa Fanego, Javier Pérez-Guerra & María José López-Couso (eds), 43-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward. 2001. Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 108-137. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 2-20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language & Linguistics 15(2): 223–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104-134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT Test: A Lexico-grammatical Analysis [TOEFLiBT Research Report (TOEFL eBT-19)]. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, Reppen, Randi, Byrd, Pat & Helt, Marie. 2002. Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36: 9-48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany & Poonpon, Kornwipa. 2011a. Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 5-35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany, Honkapohja, Alpo & Pahta, Päivi. 2011b. Prepositional modifiers in early English medical prose: A study ON their historical development IN noun phrases. In Communicating Early English Manuscripts, Päivi Pahta & Andreas Jucker (eds), 197-211. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan. 1996. Academic discourse in two disciplines: Professional writing and student development in Biology and History. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Diani, Giuliana. 2008. Emphasizers in spoken and written academic discourse: The case of really . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(3): 296-321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Zhihui, Schleppegrell, Mary & Cox, Beverly. 2006. Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research 38(3): 247-273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, Sheena & Nesi, Hilary. 2012. A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics 34(1): 1-29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany. 2011. Exploring Academic Writing through Corpus Linguistics: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
. 2013. More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora 8(2): 153-181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groom, Nicholas. 2005. Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4: 257-277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1979. Differences between spoken and written language: Some implications for literacy teaching. In Communication through reading: Proceedings of the 4th Australian Reading Conference, Vol. 2, Glenda Page, John Elkins & Barrie O’Connor (eds), 37-52. Adelaide SA: Australian Reading Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The Language of Science. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harwood, Nigel. 2005a. ‘I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever’: Discussing methods in computing science using I . English for Specific Purposes 24: 243-267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. ‘We do not seem to have a theory…the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 26(3): 343-375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hemais, Barbara. 2001. The discourse of research and practice in marketing journals. English for Specific Purposes 20: 39-59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewings, Martin & Hewings, Ann. 2002. “It is interesting to note that...”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes 21: 367-383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1996. Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17(4): 433-454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Talking to students: Metadiscourse in Introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes 18(1): 3-26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 23: 215-239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4-21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 116-127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly. 2005. Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 24:123-139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra. 2006. Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journals of English for Academic Purposes 5: 19-36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, David & Chen, Sylvia. 2009. Making a bigger deal of the smaller words: Function words and other key items in research writing by Chinese learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 18: 149-165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musgrave, Jill & Parkinson, Jean. 2014. Getting to grips with noun groups. ELT Journal 68(2): 145-154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, Hilary & Gardner, Sheena. 2012. Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, Jean & Musgrave, Jill. 2014. Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 48-59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peacock, Matthew. 2006. A cross-disciplinary comparison of boosting in research articles. Corpora 1(1): 61-84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Römer, Ute & Swales, John. 2010. The Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, David. 2002. Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990: A Curricular History. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary. 2001. Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education 12(4): 431-459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silver, Marc. 2006. Language across Disciplines: Towards a Critical Reading of Contemporary Academic Discourse. Boca Raton FL: Brown Walker Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vande Kopple, William. 1994. Some characteristics and functions of grammatical subjects in scientific discourse. Written Communication 11(4): 534-564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warchal, K. 2010. Moulding interpersonal relations through conditional clauses: Consensus-building strategies in written academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 140-150 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webber, Pauline. 1994. The function of questions in different medical journal genres. English for Specific Purposes 13(3): 257-268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wells, Rulon. 1960. Nominal and verbal style. In Style in Language, Thomas Sebeok (ed.), 213-22. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Ian. 1996. A contextual study of lexical verbs in two types of medical research report: Clinical and Experimental. English for Specific Purposes 15(3): 175-197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Pan, Fan & Xinyi Zhou
2024. Are research articles becoming more syntactically complex? Corpus-based evidence from research articles in applied linguistics and biology (1965–2015). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 42:4 ► pp. 554 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Yiyang & Qingshun He
2023. A Corpus-Based Study of the Distributions of Adnominals Across Registers and Disciplines. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Smirnova, Elizaveta
2022. Clausal complexity of expert and student writing: a corpus-based analysis of papers in social sciences. Language Learning in Higher Education 12:2 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
Seoane, Elena & Cristina Suárez-Gómez
2020. Elaboration, compression and explicitness across sub-registers of popular and academic writing in Hong Kong English. Register Studies 2:2 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Learning the language of Dentistry [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 93], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue