Cover not available

In:Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 239–262

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Active and passive infinitive, ambiguity and non-canonical subject with ready

 | University of Tampere
Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.63.17hog
This paper presents a case study of the adjective ready and discusses its properties when it occurs in the tough construction (TC). The paper discusses the active and passive infinitive variation in the TC with evidence from the Corpus of Late Modern English Texts and the British National Corpus. The ambiguity created by the active infinitive and the effect of the semantics of the subject on the choice of the infinitive form are also discussed. The results show that the TC has become more frequent in BrE, and unlike with typical tough predicates, with ready the passive infinitive has persisted, most likely because of the risk of ambiguity with the active. The data also show that when the subject is [+HUMAN], the passive infinitive is used exclusively.
References (31)
References
Biber, D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S. & Finegan E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carnie, A. 2002. Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, Y-S. 2001. Tough Construction in English: A Construction Grammar Approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins Cobuild English Dictionary. 1995. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curme, G.O. 1931. Syntax. Boston MA: D.C. Heath and company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, H. 2005. A corpus of Late Modern English. ICAME Journal 29: 69–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. & Kay P. 1995. Construction Grammar. Ms.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, G., Hunston S. & Manning E. (eds). 1998. Collins Cobuild Grammar Patterns, 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. 2001. Syntax, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hietaranta, P.S. 1983. In Defence of the Possibility of Sentential Tough Complements. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Some functional aspects of the tough construction. Studia Neophilologica 56: 21–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirst, G. 1987. Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1975. Tough and the Trace Theory of Movement Rules. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 437–447.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1940. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part V. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, C. 1987. Tough-movement in Present-Day British English: A corpus-based study. Studia Linguistica 41: 59–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nanni, D.L. 1980. On the surface syntax of constructions with easy-type adjectives. Language 56: 568–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, [URL] (fall 2012).
Postal, P.M. 1971. Cross-Over Phenomena. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. On Raising. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poutsma, H. 1914. A Grammar of Late Modern English: Part II – the parts of speech section I, A – nouns, adjectives and articles. Groningen: Noordhoof.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum S., Leech G. & Svartvik J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, G. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P.S. 1967. The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweet, H. 1898. A New English Grammar, Part II: Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, F.T. 1966. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part 2: Syntactical Units with One Verb. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamamoto, M. 1999. Animacy and Reference: A Cognitive Approach to Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Agency and Impersonality: Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations [Studies in Language Companion Series 78]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Höglund, Mikko
2018. Complementation ofashamed – diachrony and determinants of variation. In Changing Structures [Studies in Language Companion Series, 195], ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue