In:Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 209–221
Null objects and sentential complements, with evidence from the Corpus of Historical American English
Published online: 14 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.63.15rud
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.63.15rud
The present article discusses the occurrence of covert NP objects in object control structures with the matrix verb warn. The existence of such structures is at odds with Bach’s Generalization, which effectively states that the NP object in an object control structure may not be omitted. Evidence from COHA is introduced and discussed, to shed new light on the apparent exceptions to the Generalization. The frequency of the construction is tracked over the course of the past two centuries, and the nature of the covert NP object is also examined. The question is raised as to whether this NP can be assigned a general interpretation, as has been claimed in the literature, or whether a more specific interpretation is appropriate.
References (9)
Allerton, D. 1988. Infinitivitis in English. In Studies in Descriptive Linguistics (Essays on the English Language and Applied Linguistics on the Occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th Birthday), J. Klegraf, D. Nehls & G. Nickel (eds), 11–23. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.
OED, Oxford English Dictionary (OED Online) [URL] (29 February 2012).
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
