In:Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies
Edited by Tommaso Raso and Heliana Mello
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61] 2014
► pp. 191–209
Speech and corpora
How spontaneous speech analysis changed our point of view on some linguistic facts: The case of sentence intonation in French
Published online: 14 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.07mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.07mar
The analysis of spontaneous speech is of paramount importance. It allows focusing on pragmatic, syntactic, prosodic and information structures and leads to a better understanding as how they interact in actual speech. Indeed, many applications and industrial development in speech synthesis and recognition badly need coherent models to be integrated in their software, whereas today even successful systems rely mainly on word spotting if recognized speech does not simply results from oral written text reading. Other applications in oral language learning are also important by departing from traditions linguistic approaches based on written text. New tools are now becoming available to execute the main tasks involved in spontaneous speech studies: data speech recording, transcription, alignment and annotation. None of these tasks are trivial and require a sound expertise, still they are essential for the future of linguistic studies. Current research in the domain of syntax-intonation interaction already revealed unexpected results for supposedly well-known prosodic items, such that sentence modality, congruence with syntax, stress clash, left and right dislocation, parenthesis, etc. These results could not have been discovered without careful analysis of actual speech data, as the traditional available linguistic models, particularly in syntax, were, and still are, highly conditioned by the analysis of written text, a very specialized and limited mode of linguistic communication indeed.
References (19)
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire & Martin, Philippe. 2011. Structuration prosodique, dernière réorganisation avant énonciation. Langue Française 170: 127–142. Special issue Unités syntaxiques et unités prosodiques, Florence Lefeuvre & Estelle Moline (eds).
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie & Martin, Philippe. 2007. Les parenthèses: Analyse macrosyntaxique et prosodique sur corpus. In La parataxe. Vol. 2: Structures, marquages et exploitation discursive, Marie-José Béguelin, Mathieu Avanzi & Gilles Corminboeuf (eds). Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel.
Delais-Roussarie, Élisabeth, Post, Brechtje, Avanzi, Mathieu, Buthke, Carolin, Di Cristo, Albert, Feldhausen, Ingo, Jun, Sun-Ah, Martin, Philippe, Meisenburg, Trudel, Rialland, Annie, Sichel-Bazin, Rafèu & Hi-Yon Yoo. 2013. Developing a ToBI system for French. In Intonational Variation in Romance, Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Friederici, Angela D. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(2): 78–84.
Gilbert, Annie & Boucher, Victor. 2007. What do listeners attend to in hearing prosodic structures? Investigating the human speech-parser using short-term recall. Proc. Interspeech 2007: 430–443
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1996. The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody: Intonational Phonology and Prosodic Structure. New York NY: Garland.
Mertens, Piet. 2008. Syntaxe, prosodie et structure informationnelle: Une approche prédictive pour l’analyse de l’intonation dans le discours. Travaux de Linguistique 56(1): 87–124.
Michelas, Amandine & D’Imperio, Maria Paola. 2010. Durational cues and prosodic phrasing in French: Evidence for the intermediate phrase. In
Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2010 Conference
,
Chicago, IL
.
Rousselot, Pierre-Jean.1901–1908. Principes de phonétique expérimentale, Tomes 1 et 2. Paris: Didier.
Praat. 2013. [URL]
ToBI. 2013. [URL]
WinPitch. 2012. [URL]
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
