In:Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber
Edited by Tony Berber Sardinha and Marcia Veirano Pinto
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60] 2014
► pp. 3–34
Chapter 1.1 A Multi-Dimensional analysis of regional variation in American English
Published online: 31 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.01gri
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.01gri
This paper analyzes regional linguistic variation in a corpus of letters to the editor from across the United States. However, unlike most regional dialect studies, which analyze linguistic alternation variables, this study analyzes the relative frequency of parts-of-speech using a Multi-Dimensional approach, which allows for patterns of regional functional linguistic variation to be identified in this corpus. In particular, this analysis identifies three basic patterns of regional functional linguistic variation in American letters to the editor: letters from the East tend to exhibit an elaborate style, letters from the Central States tend to exhibit a narrative style, and letters from South tend to exhibit an opinionated style, when compared to letters originating from the rest of the United States.
References (25)
Atwood, E.B. (1953). A survey of verb forms in the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Grieve, J. (2009). A corpus-based regional dialect survey of grammatical
variation in written Standard American English. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
. (2011). A regional analysis of contraction rate in written
Standard American English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,
16
, 514-546.
. (2012). A statistical analysis of regional variation in
adverb position in a corpus of written Standard American English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory,
8
, 39-72.
Grieve, J., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D. (2011). A statistical method for the identification and
aggregation of regional linguistic variation. Language Variation and Change,
23
, 193-221.
. (2013). A multivariate spatial analysis of vowel formants in
American English. Journal of Linguistic Geography,
1
(1),31-51.
Kurath, H. (1949). Word geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Kurath, H., & McDavid, R.I. (1961).The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic states. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Labov, W. (1966). The linguistic variable as a structural unit. Washington Linguistics Review,
3
, 4-22.
. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of
the English copula. Language,
45
, 715-62.
Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006). Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and
sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ord, J.K., & Getis, A. (1995). Local spatial autocorrelation statistics:
Distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis,
27
, 286-306.
Preston, D. (2001). Style and the psycholinguistics of sociolinguistics:
The logical problem of language variation. In
P.
Eckert & J.R.
Rickford
(Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp.
279-304). Cambridge: CUP.
Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C., & Singer, Y. (2003). Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic
dependency network. In
Proceedings, 2003, HLT-NAACL
(pp. 252-259).
Weiner, E.J., & Labov, W. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics,
19
, 29-58.
. (1993). Identifying and interpreting variables. In
D.
Preston
(Ed.), American dialect research (pp.
193–221). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Zhen, Guo
Wingrove, Peter & Peter Crosthwaite
Yu, Xiaoli
Veirano Pinto, Marcia
2014. Chapter 2.1 Dimensions of variation in North American movies. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 60], ► pp. 109 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.