In:Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber
Edited by Tony Berber Sardinha and Marcia Veirano Pinto
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60] 2014
► pp. xxix–xxxviii
Opening. Multi-Dimensional analysis
A personal history
Published online: 31 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.005bib
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.005bib
This essay takes a personal perspective on the history of Multi-Dimensional (MD) Analysis, including motivations for the first MD studies, the influence of previous seminal research studies, and the influence of faculty colleagues at the University of Southern California. The essay also provides a short personal narrative on the development of the MD approach relative to the author’s own background and interests. A brief survey of MD studies over the intervening decades is then followed by discussion of prospects, with discussion of what has been accomplished using this approach, and what remains to be done.
References (46)
Asención, Y., & Collentine, J. (2011). A Multidimensional Analysis of a Written L2 Spanish Corpus. Applied Linguistics, 32, 299–322.
Berber Sardinha, T., Kauffmann, C., & Acunzo, C.M. (2012). Register variation in Brazilian Portuguese. Talk. Northern Arizona University.
Besnier, N. (1988). The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers. Language, 64, 707-736.
Biber, D. (1984). A model of textual relations within the written and spoken modes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
. (1985). Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multi‑feature/multi‑dimensional analyses. Linguistics, 23, 337‑60.
. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language, 62, 384‑414.
. (1990). Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5, 257-269.
. (2001). Dimensions of variation among eighteenth-century speech-based and written registers. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional studies (pp. 200-214). London: Longman.
. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2008). Corpus-based analyses of discourse: Dimensions of variation in conversation. In V. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 100-114). London: Routledge.
. (2012). Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8, 9-37.
. (to appear). Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross - linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast.
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language, 65, 487-515.
Biber, D., & Hared, M. (1992). Dimensions of register variation in Somali. Language Variation and Change, 4, 41-75.
. (1994). Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: Language adaptation in six press registers. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 182-216). Oxford: OUP.
Biber, D., & Jones, J.K. (2005). Merging corpus linguistic and discourse analytic research goals: Discourse units in biology research articles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1,151-182.
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J.K., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2006). Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A Multi-Dimensional analysis. Corpora, 1, 7-38.
Biber, D., & Kurjian, J. (2007). Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A Multi-Dimensional analysis. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and the web (pp. 109-132). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2011). Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15, 223-250.
Biber, D., Gray, B., Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45, 5-35.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking responses on the TOEFL iBT. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Brown, P., & Fraser, C. (1979). Speech as a marker of situation. In K.R. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social markers in speech (pp. 33-62). Cambridge: CUP.
Carroll, J. (1960). Vectors of prose style. In T.A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 283-292). Cambridge: CUP.
Chafe, W.L. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35-54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (Eds.) (2001). Multi-Dimensional studies of register variation in English. London: Longman.
Egbert, J. (2012). Style in nineteenth century fiction: A Multi-Dimensional analysis. Scientific Study of Literature, 2, 167-198.
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972) On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics (pp. 213-250). New York, NY: Holt.
Friginal, E. (2009). The language of outsourced call centers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2011). Patterns of linguistic variation in American legal English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Gray, B. (2011). Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E., & Nekrasova, T. (2011). Variation among blogs: A Multi-Dimensional analysis. In A. Mehler, S. Sharoff, & M. Santini (Eds.), Genres on the web: Computational models and empirical studies (pp. 303-322). London: Springer.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Jang, S. -C. (1998). Dimensions of spoken and written Taiwanese: A corpus-based register study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawaii, Manoa, HI.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T.A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 73-120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kim, Y.J., & Biber, D. (1994). A corpus-based analysis of register variation in Korean. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 157-181). Oxford: OUP.
Kodytek, V. (2008). On the replicability of the Biber model: The case of Czech. Unpublished manuscript.
Parodi, G. (2007). Variation across registers in Spanish. In G. Parodi (Ed.), Working with Spanish corpora (pp. 11-53). London: Continuum.
Purvis, T.M. (2008). A linguistic and discursive analysis of register variation in Dagbani. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1972). A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Reppen, R. (1994). Variation in elementary student writing. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
. (2001). Register variation in student and adult speech. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional studies (pp. 187-199). London: Longman.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Ansarifar, Ahmad, Hesamoddin Shahriari, Shelley Staples & Mohammad Ghazanfari
2025. Linguistic variation in two written academic sub-registers. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 162 ff.
Clarke, Isobelle
Fanego, Teresa, Paula Rodríguez-Puente, María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo, Cristina Blanco-García & Iván Tamaredo
Sardinha, Tony Berber, Carlos Kauffmann & Cristina Mayer Acunzo
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
