In:Middle and Modern English Corpus Linguistics: A multi-dimensional approach
Edited by Manfred Markus, Yoko Iyeiri, Reinhard Heuberger and Emil Chamson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 50] 2012
► pp. 241–256
Towards an understanding of Joseph Wright’s sources
White Kennett’s Parochial Antiquities (1695) and the English Dialect Dictionary
Published online: 11 April 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.50.21rua
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.50.21rua
This paper builds on previous research into the making of the English Dialect Dictionary (1898–1905): Thompson (2008), Markus (2009) and Beal (2010), among others. It evaluates the contribution of Bishop White Kennett’s glossary to Parochial Antiquities (1695) to Joseph Wright’s dictionary. By applying quantitative methods of analysis, my main aim is to ascertain the proportion of words that were illustrated by means of Kennett’s data, and to assess the treatment that Wright gave to this information. In so doing, hope that this paper may cast some light on the documentary structure of the dictionary, and contribute to our understanding of the documents that were taken as testimonies to Late Modern English (LModE) dialects.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Ruano-García, Javier
Ruano-García, Javier, Maria F. Garcia-Bermejo Giner & Pilar Sánchez-García
2015. “Provincial in England, but in common use with us”. In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 4], ► pp. 99 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
