Cover not available

In:Register and Discourse through the Lens of Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Dolores González-Álvarez and Esperanza Rama-Martínez
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 127] 2026
► pp. 266–294

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
Deconstructing economists’ arguments in the twentieth century

A diachronic cross-linguistic study of economic claims through epistemic and attitudinal stance devices in the LexEcon corpus

 | University of Trieste
 | University of Ferrara
Published online: 24 March 2026
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.127.10mus
Abstract
This chapter investigates economic discourse and argumentation across a corpus of English and Italian theoretical treatises, textbooks, and handbooks published between 1900 and 1990. We examine how epistemic and attitudinal stance markers are used to construct economic claims. By triangulating data with previous research, the analysis identifies claim-expositive lexis and concurrent markers, comparing claim presentation in theoretical treatises with that found in educational textbooks. Utilising Wmatrix7 software, we also explore key semantic domains. Results reveal consistent patterns in conveying epistemic and attitudinal stance through adverbs and complement clauses in English and Italian. Money and related subjects are identified as common semantic domains across both languages. The overarching aim is to provide a diachronic view of the evolution of argumentation in economics.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Research aims
  • 4.Data and methodology
    • 4.1The LexEcon corpus
    • 4.2Research design and method
  • 5.Analysis and discussion
    • 5.1Quantitative investigation
    • 5.2Semantic analysis
    • 5.3A cross-linguistic perspective on argumentation
    • 5.4Qualitative analysis
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (35)
References
Backhouse, R., Dudley-Evans, T., & Henderson, W. (1993). Exploring the language and rhetoric of economics. In W. Henderson, T. Dudley-Evans, & R. Backhouse (Eds.), Economics and language (pp. 1–20). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2023). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (1993). Money talks: The rhetorical project of The Wealth of Nations. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan E. (2021). Grammar of spoken and written English. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blaug, M. (1992). The methodology of economics. Or how economists explain (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (1993). How economists modify propositions. In W. Henderson, T. Dudley-Evans & R. Backhouse (Eds.), Economics and language (pp. 153–169). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloor, T., & Pindi, M. (1990). Schematic structure of economics forecasts. In T. Dudley-Evans & W. Henderson (Eds.), The language of economics: The analysis of economics discourse (pp. 54–66). Modern English Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bondi, M. (2006). ‘A case in point’: Signals of narrative development in business and economics. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 47–72). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donohue, J. P. (2006). How to support a one-handed economist: The role of modalisation in economic forecasting. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 200–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dow, S. C. (1999). Rationality and rhetoric in Smith and Keynes. In R. Rossini Favretti, G. Sandri, & R. Scazzieri (Eds.), Incommensurability and translation. Kuhnian perspectives on scientific communication and theory change (pp. 189–200). Edward Elgar. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, T., & Henderson, W. (1990). The organisation of article introductions: Evidence of change in economics writing. In T. Dudley-Evans & W. Henderson (Eds.), The language of economics: The analysis of economics discourse (pp. 67–78). Modern English Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gualdo, R. (2021). Introduzione ai linguaggi specialistici [Introduction to specialized languages]. Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). L’italiano dell’economia [The Italian language of economics]. Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gualdo, R., & Telve, S. (2011). Linguaggi specialistici dell’italiano [Italian special languages]. Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, W., & Hewings, A. (1990). A language of model building? In T. Dudley-Evans & W. Henderson (Eds.), The language of economics: The analysis of economics discourse (pp. 43–54). Modern English Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewings, A. (1990). Aspects of the language of economics textbooks. In T. Dudley-Evans & W. Henderson (Eds.), The language of economics: The analysis of economics discourse (pp. 29–42). Modern English Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2016). Change of attitude. A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), pp. 251–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2018). Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics, 4, 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klamer, A. (1990). The textbook presentation of economic discourse. In W. J. Samuels (Ed.), Economics as discourse. An analysis of the language of economists (pp. 129–154). Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klamer, A., & McCloskey, D. N. (1988). Economics in the human conversation. In A. Klamer, D. N. McCloskey, & R. M. Solow (Eds.), The consequences of economic rhetoric (pp. 3–20). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klamer, A., McCloskey, D. N., & Solow, R. M. (Eds.). (1988). The consequences of economic rhetoric. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, M. (1990). Dancing on air: Analysis of a passage from an economics textbook. In T. Dudley-Evans & W. Henderson (Eds.), The language of economics: The analysis of economics discourse (pp. 16–28). Modern English Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. (1983). The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 21(2), 481–517.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). The rhetoric of economics. The University of Wisconsin Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, L. (1983). Gli atti del discorso economico: La previsione. Status illocutorio e modelli linguistici nel testo inglese [The acts of economic discourse: Forecasting. Illocutionary status and linguistic models in the English text]. Edizioni Zara.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Traduzione e pragmatica del discorso [Translation and pragmatics of discourse]. In G. Cortese (Ed.), Tradurre i linguaggi settoriali [Translating special languages] (pp. 73–85). Edizioni Libreria Cortina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Il discorso economico/argomentativo: Marcatezza e complessità della previsione [The economic/argumentative discourse: Markedness and complexity of forecasts]. In L. Schena, C. Preite, & S. Vecchiato (Eds.), Gli insegnamenti linguistici nel nuovo ordinamento: Lauree triennali e specialistiche dell’area economico-giuridica [Language courses in the new system: Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in the economic-legal area] (pp. 301–324). Egea.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musacchio, M. T. (2026). How economists modify their claims: A cross-linguistic study of epistemic and attitudinal stance in the diachronic LexEcon corpus. In N. Ramón & M. Pérez Blanco (Eds.), Multilingual corpus research: Advances and challenges (pp. 202–230). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuels, W. J. (1990). Economics as discourse. An analysis of the language of economists. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serianni, L., & Castelvecchi, A. (2012). Italiano [Italian]. Garzanti.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simonnæs, I., & Kristiansen, M. (2018). Economic language. In J. Humbley, G. Budin, & C. Laurén (Eds.), Language for special purposes. An international handbook (pp. 151–185). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1993). The paradox of value: Six treatments in search of the reader. In W. Henderson, T. Dudley-Evans & R. Backhouse (Eds.), Economics and language (pp. 223–239). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue