In:Register and Discourse through the Lens of Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Dolores González-Álvarez and Esperanza Rama-Martínez
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 127] 2026
► pp. 71–90
Chapter 3A diachronic register approach to complex prenominal modifiers
Published online: 24 March 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.127.03cal
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.127.03cal
Abstract
This chapter examines the emergence and recent diachronic development as well as the global spread of complex
prenominal modifiers that involve (i) a comparison (e.g., better-than-average health) and (ii)
an adjective plus infinitival clause (e.g., easy-to-understand guidelines) in two short- and
long-term diachronic corpora of American English that are balanced for register. We show that these modifiers are a register
feature of popular magazines and news reporting — registers subject to economy of expression and densification. Additionally,
data taken from a corpus consisting of web-based newspapers and magazines from 20 different varieties of English suggest that
complex premodifiers have also spread globally to comparable registers, but to varying degrees: they are much more frequent in
South-East Asian Englishes than in African Englishes, which we explain by a substrate effect.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and methodology
- 3.Results
- 3.1Long- and short-term diachronic development and register differences
- 3.2Spread of complex prenominal modifiers to comparable
registers in World Englishes
- 4.Conclusion
Notes References
References (35)
Akinlotan, M. (2018). The
structural simplification hypothesis and the premodifiers in Nigerian English. Anglica.
An International Journal of English
Studies, 27(2), 59–88.
Biber, D. (2003). Compressed
noun phrase structures in newspaper discourse: The competing demands of popularization vs.
economy. In J. Aitchison & D. Lewis (Eds.), New
media
language (pp. 169–181). Routledge.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2011). The
historical shift of scientific academic prose in English towards less explicit styles of expression: Writing without
verbs. In V. Bhatia, P. Sánchez Hernández, & P. Pérez-Paredes (Eds.), Researching
specialized
languages (pp. 11–24). John Benjamins.
Biber, D., Grieve, J., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2009). Noun
phrase modification. In G. Rohdenburg & J. Schlüter (Eds.), One
language, two grammars? Differences between British and American
English (pp. 182–193). Cambridge University Press.
Brunner, T. (2014). Structural
nativization, typology and complexity: Noun phrase structures in British, Kenyan and Singaporean
English. English Language and
Linguistics, 18(1), 23–48.
(2017). Simplicity
and typological effects in the emergence of New Englishes. The noun phrase in Singaporean and Kenyan
English. De Gruyter.
Davies, M. (2008). The
Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). [URL]
(2010). The
Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). [URL]
(2012). Expanding
horizons in historical linguistics with the 400-million word Corpus of Historical American
English. Corpora, 7, 121–157.
(2016). Corpus
of News on the Web (NOW). [URL]
Dryer, M. (2011). Noun-modifier
order in Africa. In O. Hieda, C. König, & H. Nakagawa (Eds.), Geographical
typology and linguistic areas: With special reference to
Africa (pp. 287–311). John Benjamins.
Fried, M. (2015). Construction
Grammar. In A. Alexiadou & T. Kiss (Eds.), Syntax
— Theory and analysis. An international
handbook (pp. 974–1003). Mouton de Gruyter.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions:
A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.
Gonçalves, B., Loureiro-Porto, L., Ramasco, J. J., & Sánchez, D. (2018). Mapping
the Americanization of English in space and time. PloS
One, 13(5), e0197741.
Günther, C. (2018). A
difficult to explain phenomenon: Increasing complexity in the prenominal
position. English Language and
Linguistics, 23(3), 645–670.
Hilpert, M., & Diessel, H. (2017). Entrenchment
in Construction Grammar. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment
and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic
knowledge (pp. 57–74). De Gruyter Mouton.
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Construction
Grammar: Introduction. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of Construction
Grammar (pp. 1–12). Oxford University Press.
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change
in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge University Press.
Levin, M., & Ström Herold, J. (2024). English
complex premodifiers and their German and Swedish correspondences. Languages in
Contrast, 24(1), 5–32.
Ljung, M. (2000). Text
condensation in the press: The case of compound adjectival
premodifiers. In C. Dalton-Puffer & N. Ritt (Eds.), Words:
Structure, meaning, function. A Festschrift for Dieter
Kastovsky (pp. 205–216). De Gruyter Mouton.
Mair, C. (2013). The
World System of Englishes: Accounting for the transnational importance of mobile and mediated
vernaculars. English
World-Wide, 34(3), 253–278.
Mazaud, C. (2004). Complex
premodifiers in Present-day English. A corpus-based study [Unpublished doctoral
dissertation]. University of Heidelberg.
Meibauer, J. (2007). How
marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and
I/Q-interaction. Morphology, 17(2), 233–259.
Moody, A. (2020). World
Englishes in the media. In D. Schreier, M. Hundt, & E. W. Schneider (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of World
Englishes (pp. 653–675). Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial
English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge University Press.
(2020). English
in the United States. In C. L. Nelson, Z. G. Proshina, & D. R. Davis (Eds.), The
handbook of World Englishes (2nd
ed., pp. 37–51). Wiley Blackwell.
Smitterberg, E. (2021). Syntactic
change in Late Modern English: Studies on colloquialization and
densification. Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. (2008). Grammaticalization,
constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in
English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation,
selection, development: Probing the evolutionary model of language
change (pp. 219–50). Mouton de Gruyter.
Trips, C. (2014). How
to account for the expressive nature of phrasal compounds in a conceptual-semantic
framework. SKASE Journal of Theoretical
Linguistics, 11(1), 33–61.
