In:Multilingual Corpus Research: Advances and challenges
Edited by Noelia Ramón and María Pérez Blanco
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 126] 2026
► pp. 45–70
Chapter 2Effective stance in English and Spanish newspaper opinion articles on irregular immigration and humanitarian crises
The Independent versus El Mundo
Published online: 20 February 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.126.02car
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.126.02car
Abstract
This paper presents a quantitative and contrastive analysis of effective stance — the kind of stance aimed at determining or
influencing the course of reality — in opinion articles from two newspapers of comparable ideology, The Independent from
the United Kingdom and El Mundo from Spain. The corpus under analysis consists of two subcorpora of 60,000 words from
each newspaper concerning irregular immigration and humanitarian crises involving refugees. The study uncovers differences in the quantity
and distribution of effective stance expressions in the two subcorpora and intra-subcorpus dissimilarities between articles on irregular
immigration and humanitarian crises, thus shedding light on the ways in which columnists aim at persuading readers to share their
viewpoints regarding these issues.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Effective stance: Concept, types, criteria and review of the literature
- 2.1The concepts of epistemic and effective stance
- 2.2Subcategories of effective stance
- 2.3Criteria for delimiting effective stance
- 2.4Review of the literature on effective stance
- 3.Aims of the paper and research hypotheses
- 4.Corpus description and annotation
- 4.1The corpus
- 4.2The annotation and statistical analysis
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1Use of effective stance expressions in The Independent versus El Mundo
- 5.1.1Deonticity and Potentiality: The preferred choice
- 5.1.1.1DM in The Independent and El Mundo
- 5.1.1.2POT in The Independent and El Mundo
- 5.1.2NRM, DIR, INC and INT markers in The Independent and El Mundo
- 5.1.1Deonticity and Potentiality: The preferred choice
- 5.2Effective stance categories used in humanitarian and immigration subcorpora
- 5.2.1DM and POT across subcorpora
- 5.2.2DIR and NRM across subcorpora
- 5.1Use of effective stance expressions in The Independent versus El Mundo
- 6.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (31)
Alcaraz-Mármol, G., & Soto-Almela, J. (2022). Refugees’ dehumanisation in the Spanish media: A corpus-assisted study within the semantic preference
framework. Applied Linguistics Review, 13(5), 791–817.
Biri, Y. (2023). Affective stance as positioning in an English-speaking online fan community. Journal of Pragmatics, 215, 70–83.
Borlongan, A. M., & Lim, L. (Eds.). (2024). Multilingualism and mobility in the twenty-first century: New trajectories and possibilities in migration linguistics. Special Issue of AILA Review, 37(1).
Boye, K. (2010). Evidence for what? Evidentiality and scope. STUF — Language Typology and Universals, 63, 290–307.
(2023). Propositions and states of affairs: A cognitive linguistic approach. In J. M. Hartmann & A. Wöllstein (Eds.), Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie / Propositional arguments in cross-linguistic research:
Theoretical and empirical issues (pp. 85–114). Gunter Narr.
Carretero, M., & Domínguez Romero, E. (2024). Effective stance in conservative newspaper opinion articles on irregular immigration and refugee humanitarian
crises. Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 41, 7–29.
De Rosa, A. S., Bocci, E., & Proietti, S. (2023). (Im)migration in Italian online press through the lens of the Social Representations Theory. International Review of Sociology, 33(1), 1–47.
Díaz-Peralta, M. (2024). Epistemic stance and public discourse on irregular migration in one of Europe’s outermost regions. Journal of Language and Politics, 24(3), 415–436.
DuBois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (pp. 139–182). John Benjamins.
Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In M.-L. Sorjonen & A. Peräkylä (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 16–41). Oxford University Press.
Islentyeva, A. (2020). Corpus-based analysis of ideological bias: Migration in the British press. Routledge.
(2013). Modals: Striving for control. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero, J. Arús Hita, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality (pp. 3–55). Mouton de Gruyter.
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2011). Effective vs. epistemic stance and subjectivity in political discourse: Legitimising strategies and mystification of
responsibility. In C. Hart (Ed.), Critical discourse studies in context and cognition (pp. 193–224). John Benjamins.
(2013). Stancetaking and inter-subjectivity in the Iraq Inquiry: Blair vs. Brown. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero, J. Arús Hita, & J. Van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality (pp. 411–445). Mouton de Gruyter.
(2021a). Stance, emotion and persuasion: Terrorism and the press. Journal of Pragmatics, 177, 135–148.
(2021b). Winds of war: Epistemic and effective control in political discourse. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación / Culture, Language and Representation, 26, 289–307.
(2023). Epistemic and effective stance and the expression of inter/subjectivity. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, L. Hidalgo-Downing, & J. R. Zamorano-Mansilla (Eds.), Stance, inter/subjectivity and identity in discourse (pp. 29–56). Peter Lang.
Martínez Lirola, M. (2023). A critical-discourse study of the representation of unaccompanied foreign minors in a sample of the Spanish
press. Lengua y Sociedad, 22(1), 81–100.
Martínez Torvisco, J., & Chinea, S. (2020). Immigrants and refugees: Two sides of the same problem. A linguistic analysis through newspapers and social network in
Spain 2006 and 2015. International Review of Sociology, 30(1), 71–89.
Mora-López, N., & Ferrer-Navas, S. (2023). An English-Spanish contrastive analysis of effective stance in newspaper and political discourse. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, L. Hidalgo-Downing, & J. R. Zamorano-Mansilla (Eds.), Stance, inter/subjectivity and identity in discourse (pp. 57–74). Peter Lang.
Mustafa-Awad, Z., & Kirner-Ludwig, M. (2021). Syrian refugees in digital news discourse: Depictions and reflections in Germany. Discourse & Communication, 15(1), 74–97.
O’Regan, V., & Riordan, E. (2018). Comparing the representation of refugees, asylum seekers and migrants in the Irish and UK Press: A corpus-based critical
discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(6), 744–768.
Schröter, J. (2023). The Austrian press discourse on refugees, migrants, and migration: A corpus linguistic approach. In A. Fábián (Ed.), The representation of refugees and migrants in European national media discourses from 2015 to 2017: A contrastive approach
(Corpus Linguistics) (pp. 23–66). Springer.
Seo, S., & Başak Kavaklı, S. (2022). Media representations of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants: A meta-analysis of research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 46(3), 159–173.
