Achard, M. (2018). Teaching usage and concepts: Toward a cognitive pedagogical grammar. In A. Tyler, L. Huang, & H. Jan (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research (pp. 37–62). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Achiba, M. (2003). Learning to request in a second language: A study of child interlanguage pragmatics. Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Agar, M. (2007). Culture blends. In L. Monaghan, & J. Goodman (Eds.), A cultural approach to interpersonal communication: Essential readings (pp. 13–24). Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. (1996). Conversational routines in English. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Corpus pragmatics: From form to function. In A. Jucker, K. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 555–586). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, K., & Rühlemann, C. (Eds.). (2015). Corpus pragmatics: A handbook. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C. (2012). Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 42–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allami, H., & Eslamizadeh, A. R. (2022). Self-sacrifice expressions in Persian. International Journal of Language and Culture, 9(1), 151–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, C. (2005). A local grammar of cause and effect: A corpus-driven study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham.
Allen, J., & Core, M. (1997). Draft of DAMSL: Dialog act markup in several layers. Retrieved on 21 March 2025 from [URL]
Andersen, G. (2011). Corpus-based pragmatics I: Qualitative studies. In W. Bublitz, & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of pragmatics (pp. 587–628). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archer, D. (2010). Speech acts. In A. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Historical pragmatics (pp. 379–417). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archer, D., & Culpeper, J. (2003). Sociopragmatic annotation: New directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 37–58). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Corpus annotation. In A. Jucker, K. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 495–525). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archer, D., Culpeper, J., & Davies, M. (2008). Pragmatic annotation. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 613–642). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, C. (2012). FrameNet, current collaborations and future goals. Language Resources and Evaluation, 46(2), 269–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2012). Corpora and gender studies. In K. Hyland, C. M. Huat, & M. Handford (Eds.), Corpus applications in applied linguistics (pp. 100–116). Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnbrook, G. (1995). The language of definition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham.
Barnbrook, G., & Sinclair, J. (1995). Parsing COBUILD entries. In J. Sinclair, M. Hoelter, & C. Peters (Eds.), The languages of definition: The formalization of dictionary definitions for natural language processing (pp. 13–58). European Commission.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Specialised corpus, local and functional grammars. In M. Ghadessy, A. Henry, & R. Roseberry (Eds.), Small corpus studies and ELT: Theory and practice (pp. 237–276). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Battistella, E. (2014). Sorry about that: The language of public apology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bean, J. M., & Johnstone, B. (1994). Workplace reasons for saying you’re sorry: Discourse task management and apology in telephone interviews. Discourse Processes, 17(1), 59–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, M. (2007). Local grammar and register variation: Explorations in broadsheet and tabloid newspaper discourse. Empirical Language Research, 1(1), 1–22. [URL]
(2008). Emotion talk across corpora. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertuccelli Papi, M. (2000). Is a diachronic speech act theory possible? Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(1), 57–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (Eds.). (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman. Republished as Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (Eds.). (2021). Grammar of spoken and written English. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, K. (2011). Sentiment analysis based on appraisal theory and functional local grammar (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Illinois Institute of Technology.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H., & Sag, I. (Eds.). (2012). Sign-based construction grammar. CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in corpus linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brezina, V., Love, R., & Aijmer, K. (2018). Corpus approaches to contemporary British speech: Sociolinguistic studies of the spoken BNC2014. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (Eds.). (1982). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1998). How and why are women more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community. In J. Coates (Ed.), Language and gender: A reader (pp. 81–99). Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bunt, H., Alexanderson, J., Carletta, J., Choe, J. W., Fang, A. C., Hasida, K., Lee, K., Petukhova, V., Popescu-Belis, A., Romary, L., Soria, C., & Traum, D. (2010). Towards an ISO standard for dialogue act annotation. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, M. Rosner, & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on language resources and evaluation (pp. 2548–2555). European Language Resources Association, Valletta, Malta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Syntactic functions in functional discourse grammar and role and reference grammar: An evaluative comparison. Language Sciences, 34(4), 480–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2005). Language, gender, and sexuality: Current issues and new directions. Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 482–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1995). Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 141–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, R., & Yang, D. (2010). Responding to compliments in Chinese: Has it changed. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1951–1963. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, H., & Liu, Y. (2025). Refusals in Japanese parliamentary deliberations. Journal of Pragmatics, 242, 237–250.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, S. (2010). A corpus-based approach to the study of speech act of thanking. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 36(2), 257–274.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, W., & Ching, T. (2018). “Not a guarantee of future performance”: The local grammar of disclaimers. Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 263–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, J. (2013). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (3rd ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Morphosyntax: Constructions of the world’s languages. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1985). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (2nd ed.). Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., & Gillings, M. (2018). Politeness variation in English: A north-south divide? In V. Brezina, R. Love, & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Corpus approaches to contemporary British speech: Sociolinguistic studies of the spoken BNC2014 (pp. 33–59). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deutschmann, M. (2003). Apologising in British English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Umeå University.
Dickins, P., & Woods, E. (1988). Some criteria for the development of communicative grammar tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 22(4), 623–646. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, S. (1997). The theory of functional grammar, Part 1: The structure of the clause. De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, P., Hepburn, A., Margutti, P., & Galatolo, R. (2016). Introduction to the special issue on apologies in discourse. Discourse Processes, 53(1–2), 1–4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrant, P., & Mathews-Aydınlı, J. (2011). A function-first approach to identifying formulaic language in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 58–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (Eds.). (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edmondson, W., House, J., & Kádár, D. (Eds.). (2023). Expressions, speech acts and discourse: A pedagogic interactional grammar of English. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenstein, M., & Bodman, J. (1986). “I very appreciate”: Expressions of gratitude by native and non-native speakers of American English. Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 167–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (Eds.). (2016). Usage-Based approaches to language acquisition and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedorenko, E., Piantadosi, S., & Gibson, E. (2024). Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought. Nature, 630, 575–586. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In E. W. Bach, & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., & Atkins, B. (1992). Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer, E. F. Kittay, & R. Lehrer (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 75–102). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Johnson, C., & Petruck, M. (2003). Background to Framenet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 235–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (1990). Problems of speech act theory from an applied perspective. Language Learning, 40(1), 79–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foley, W., & Van Valin, R. D. (Eds.). (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E. (Eds.). (1996). Collins Cobuild grammar patterns 1: Verbs. HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Eds.). (1998). Collins Cobuild grammar patterns 2: Nouns and adjectives. HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1981). On apologising. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech (pp. 259–271). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, M., & Nikiforidou, K. (Eds.). (2025). The Cambridge handbook of construction grammar. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuoli, M., & Hommerberg, C. (2015). Optimising transparency, reliability and replicability: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora, 10(3), 315–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, P. (2015). Speech acts: A synchronic perspective. In K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook (pp. 29–51). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geis, M. (1995). Speech acts and conversational interaction. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A., & Herbst, T. (2021). The nice-of-you construction and its fragments. Linguistics, 59(1), 285–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greaves, C., & Warren, M. (2022). What can a corpus tell us about multi-word units? In A. O’Keeffe & M. J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 204–220). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. (1996). Comparing English worldwide: The international corpus of English. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2009). Quantitative corpus linguistics with R: A practical introduction (1st ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groom, N. (2005). Patterns and meanings across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 257–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, M. (1993). Local grammars and their representation by finite automata. In M. Hoey (Ed.), Data, description, discourse: Papers on the English language in honour of John McH. Sinclair (pp. 26–38). HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Afterwords. In G. Tompson & S. Hunston (Eds.), System and corpus: Exploring connections (pp. 293–299). Equinox. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Complementarities in language. The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (Eds.). (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Edward Arnold. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, P. (2004). Corpus pattern analysis. In G. Williams & S. Vessier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th EURALEX international congress (pp. 87–97). Université de Bretagne-Sud.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Lexical patterns: From Hornby to Hunston and beyond. In E. Bernal, & J. DeCesaris (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th EURALEX international congress (pp. 89–129). Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Lexical analysis: Norms and exploitations. The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, P., & Ma, W. (2021). Meaning and grammar in the light of corpus pattern analysis. International Journal of Lexicography, 34(1), 135–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, P., & Može, S. (2019). The way to analyse ‘way’: A case study in word-specific local grammar. International Journal of Lexicography, 32(3), 247–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, P., & Pustejovsky, J. (2005). A pattern dictionary for natural language processing. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 10(2), 63–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2012). CQPweb — Combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbert, R. (1990). Sex-based differences in compliment behaviour. Language in Society, 19(2), 201–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbst, T. (2016). Foreign language learning is construction learning — What else? Moving towards pedagogical construction grammar. In S. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp. 21–52). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Raymond, C. W. (2016). Are explicit apologies proportional to the offenses they address? Discourse Processes, 53(1–2), 5–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J., Raymond, C. W., & Drew, P. (2019). Constructing apologies: Reflexive relationships between apologies and offenses. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 185–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinkel, E. (1994). Pragmatics of interaction: Expressing thanks in a second language. Applied Language Learning, 5(1), 73–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language (1st ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1988). Paying compliments: A sex-preferential politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(4), 445–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 194–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Apologies in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 19(2), 155–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Women, men and politeness. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, J., & Kádár, D. (2023). Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics: A position paper. Language Teaching, 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Y. (2017). Introduction: What is pragmatics? In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–18). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hughes, R., & McCarthy, M. (1998). From sentence to discourse: Discourse grammar and English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 263–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2002a). Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation: Applications of a corpus-driven grammar. In R. Reppen, S. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp. 167–183). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002b). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Frame, phrase or function: A comparison of frame semantics and local grammars. In D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Proceedings of the corpus linguistics conference 2003 (pp. 342–358). University of Lancaster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Counting the uncountable: Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus. In A. Partington, J. Morley, & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and discourse (pp. 157–188). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Starting with the small words: Patterns, lexis and semantic sequences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(3), 271–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Pattern grammar in context. In T. Herbst, H-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Construction collocations patterns (pp. 99–120). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Patterns, constructions, and applied linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(3), 324–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Corpora in applied linguistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (1998). Verbs observed: A corpus-driven pedagogic grammar. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 45–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Sinclair, J. (2000). A local grammar of evaluation. In S. Hunston, & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 74–101). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Su, H. (2019). Patterns, constructions, and local grammar: A case study of “Evaluation”. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 567–593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). “I would like to thank my supervisor”. Acknowledgements in graduate dissertations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 259–275.
Johnson, D. I., Roloff, M., & Riffee, M. (2004). Politeness theory and refusals of requests: Face threat as a function of expressed obstacles. Communication Studies, 55(2), 227–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, A. (2009). Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1611–1635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Apologies in the history of English: Evidence from the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). Corpus Pragmatics, 2, 375–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Speech act attenuation in the history of English: The case of apologies. Glossa, 4(1), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, A., & Taavitsainen, I. (2000). Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(1), 67–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Apologies in the history of English: Routinized and lexicalized expressions of responsibility and regret. In A. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (pp. 229–244). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Complimenting in the history of American English: A metacommunicative expression analysis. In I. Taavitsainen, A. Jucker, & J. Tuominen (Eds.), Diachronic corpus pragmatics (pp. 257–276). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, A., Schreier, D., & Hundt, M. (Eds.). (2009). Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kachru, Y. (1991). Speech acts in world Englishes: Toward a framework for research. World Englishes, 10(3), 299–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Speech acts in (inter)action: Repeated questions. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(1), 125–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (Eds.). (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1998). An introduction to corpus linguistics. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Smrž, P., & Tugwell, D. (2004). The sketch engine. In G. Williams, & S. Vessier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th EURALEX international congress (pp. 105–116). Université de Bretagne-Sud, Lorient, France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirk, J. (2016). The pragmatic annotation scheme of the SPICE-Ireland Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(3), 299–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirk, J., & Nelson, G. (2018). The International Corpus of English project: A progress report. World Englishes, 37(4), 697–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Tracing directives through text and time: Towards a methodology of a corpus-based diachronic speech-act analysis. In A. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (pp. 295–310). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Speech acts: A diachronic perspective. In K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook (pp. 52–83). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kondo, S. (2010). Apologies: Raising learners’ cross-cultural awareness. In A. Martínez-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 145–162). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopytko, R. (1995). Against rationalistic pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(5), 475–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraaz, M., & Bernaisch, T. (2020). Backchannels and the pragmatics of South Asian Englishes. World Englishes, 41, 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazare, A. (2004). On apology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, C. (2018). Researching and teaching second language speech acts in the Chinese context. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning, 50(4), 675–724. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G., & Weisser, M. (2003). Generic speech act annotation for task-oriented dialogues. In D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Proceedings of the corpus linguistics conferences 2003 (pp. 441–446). University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G., Weisser, M., Wilson, A., & Grice, M. (2000). Survey and guidelines for the representation and annotation of dialogue. In D. Gibbon, I. Mertins, & R. Moore (Eds.), Handbook of multimodal and spoken dialogue systems (pp. 1–101). Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). The essential inadequacies of speech act models of dialogue. In H. Parrent, M. Sbisà, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics (pp. 473–492). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Speech acts. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 199–216). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, J., & Ye, T. (2023). Patterns and functions of I in academic writing: From a local grammar approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 61, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Limberg, H. (2015). Principles for pragmatics teaching: Apologies in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 69(3), 275–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Teaching how to apologize: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input. Language Teaching Research, 20(6), 700–718. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, B. (2010). Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In N. Indurkhya & F. Damerau (Eds.), Handbook of natural language processing (2nd ed., pp. 627–666). CRC Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Y., & Lu, X. (2020). N1 of N2 constructions in academic written discourse: A pattern grammar analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47, 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutzky, U., & Kehoe, A. (2017a). “I apologise for my poor blogging”: Searching for apologies in the Birmingham Blog Corpus. Corpus Pragmatics, 1, 37–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”: A corpus pragmatic analysis of apologies in blog data. Journal of Pragmatics, 116, 27–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyngfelt, B. (2018). Introduction: Constructicons and constructicography. In B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. H. Ohara, & T. T. Torrent (Eds.), Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages (pp. 1–18). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Màrquez, L., Carreras, X., Litkowski, K., & Stevenson, S. (2008). Semantic role labeling: An introduction to the special issue. Computational Linguistics, 34(2), 145–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J., & White, P. (Eds.). (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1955). Economie des changements phonétiques. Traité de phonologie diachronique. Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A., & Usó-Juan, E. (2020). Teaching speech acts in a second language. In K. Schneider & E. Ifantidou (Eds.), Developmental and clinical pragmatics (pp. 269–300). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, O. 2004. Automatic processing of local grammar patterns. In M. Lee (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th annual colloquium for the UK special interest group for computational linguistics (pp. 166–171). University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, O., & Hunston, S. (2004). The automatic recognition of verb patterns: A feasibility study. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(2), 253–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauranen, A. (2004). Where next? A summary of the round table discussion. In G. Del Lungo Camiciotti, & E. Tognini Bonelli (Eds.), Academic discourse — New insights into evaluation (pp. 203–215). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1995). Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it? ELT Journal, 49(3), 207–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T. (2018). The spoken BNC2014. In V. Brezina, R. Love, & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Corpus approaches to contemporary British speech (pp. 10–15). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (Eds.). (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, J. (2017). Corpus linguistics: Some (meta-)pragmatic reflections. Corpus Pragmatics, 1(3), 185–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, C. (2002). English corpus linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. (1999). Sorry in the Pacific: Defining communities, defining practices. Language in Society, 28, 225–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, A., Worthington, E., & McDaniel, M. (2008). Gender and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(8), 843–876. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). I’m sorry you are such an arsehole: (Non-)canonical apologies and their implications for (im)politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 223–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A. (2018). Corpus-based function-to-form approaches. In A. Jucker, K. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 587–618). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., Clancy, B., & Adolphs, S. (Eds.). (2019). Introducing pragmatics in use (2nd ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogiermann, E. (2015). Apology discourse. In K. Tracy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 49–54). John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, R. (2014). Saying ‘sorry’: Corporate apologies posted on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 30–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, M. (2008). Exemplification in learner writing: A cross-linguistic perspective. In F. Meunier & S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 101–119). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Phraseological competence: A missing component in university entrance language tests? Insights from a study of EFL learners’ use of statistical collocations. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(1), 29–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Hernández, L. (2012). Saying something for a particular purpose: Constructional compatibility and constructional families. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 25, 189–210.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Illocutionary constructions: (Multiple source)-in-target metonymies, illocutionary ICMs, and specification links. Language & Communication, 33, 128–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Speech acts in English: From research to instruction and textbook development. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pontrandolfo, G., & Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2014). Exploring the local grammar of evaluation: The case of adjective patterns in American and Italian judicial discourse. Research in Language, 12(1), 71–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rees-Miller, J. (2011). Compliments revisited: Contemporary compliments and gender. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2673–2688. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ren, W. (2022). Second language pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ren, W., Li, S., & Lü, X. (2023). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of second language pragmatics instruction. Applied Linguistics, 44(6), 1010–1029. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Revis, M., & Bernaisch, T. (2020). The pragmatic nativisation of pauses in Asian Englishes. World Englishes, 39, 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (2008). Pragmatics and corpus linguistics: A mutualistic entente. Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C. (2006). Coming to terms with conversational grammar: ‘Dislocation’ and ‘dysfluency’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(4), 385–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Lexical grammar: The GET-passive as a case in point. ICAME Journal, 31(1), 111–127. [URL]
(2008). A register approach to teaching conversation: Farewell to standard English? Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 672–693. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Conversational grammar-feminine grammar? A sociopragmatic corpus study. Journal of English Linguistic, 38(1), 56–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Corpus-based pragmatics II: Quantitative studies. In W. Bublitz, & N. Norrick (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, Vol. 1: Foundations of pragmatics (pp. 629–656). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Corpus linguistics for pragmatics: A guide for research. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C., & Aijmer, K. (2015). Corpus pragmatics: Laying the foundations. In K. Aijmer, & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C., & Clancy, B. (2018). Corpus linguistics and pragmatics. In C. Ilie, & N. Norrick (Eds.), Pragmatics and its interfaces (pp. 241–266). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schauer, G. (2019). Teaching and learning English in the primary school. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H. (2003). Do women and men really live in different cultures? Evidence from the BNC. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 185–221). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, K. (2021). Notes on variational metapragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 12–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schueler, D., & Marx, M. (2023). Speech acts in the Dutch COVID-19 press conferences. Language Resources and Evaluation, 57, 869–892. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2010). Why women apologize more than men: Gender differences in thresholds for offensive behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 1649–1655. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. The University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siemund, P. (2018). Speech acts and clause types: English in a cross-linguistic context. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siepmann, D. (2005). Discourse markers across languages: A contrastive study of second-level discourse markers in native and non-native text with implications for general and pedagogic lexicography. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Defining the definiendum. In G. de Schryver (Ed.), A way with words: Recent advances in lexical theory and analysis (pp. 37–47). Menha Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, N. (2008). I was wrong: The meanings of apologies. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stadler, S. (2011). Coding speech acts for their degree of explicitness. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 36–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steels, L. (2011). Introducing fluid construction grammar. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in fluid construction grammar (pp. 3–30). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2003). A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts. In K. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 105–126). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Sequence and order: The neo-Firthian tradition of corpus semantics. In H. Hasselgård, J. Ebeling, & S. Ebeling (Eds.), Corpus perspectives on patterns of lexis (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, H. (2015). Judgement and adjective complementation patterns in biographical discourse: A corpus study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham.
(2017). Local grammars of speech acts: An exploratory study. Journal of Pragmatics, 111, 72–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). “Thank bloody god it’s Friday”: A local grammar of thanking. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(1), 83–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Is a meaning-based grammar of English possible? Exploring English grammar from the perspectives of pattern grammar and local grammar. English Today, 35(4), 53–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020a). Patterns, local grammars, and the design of English teaching materials. ELT Journal, 74(1), 73–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, H., & Fu, Y. (2023). Local grammar approaches to speech acts in Chinese: A case study of exemplification. Journal of Pragmatics, 212, 44–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, H., & Lu, X. (2022). Assessing pragmatic performance in advanced L2 academic writing through the lens of local grammars: A case study of ‘exemplification’. Assessing Writing, 54, 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). Local grammars and intercultural speech act studies: A study of apologies in four English varieties. Intercultural Pragmatics, 20(4), 377–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). Pattern grammar, construction grammar, and local grammar: Convergences and divergences. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 55(6), 925–937. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, H., & Zhang, L. (2020). Local grammars and discourse acts in academic writing: A case study of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, H., Ye, J., & Wei, N. (2024). Integrating pattern grammar and local grammar into the identification of constructions and the development of a pedagogical constructicon in EAP context: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 70, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, H., Ye, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023). A local grammar approach to investigating the discursive representation of covid-19 in Chinese and American news media. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 1, 12–23+144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, H., Zhang, Y., & Chau, M. (2022). Exemplification in Chinese English-major MA students’ and expert writers’ academic writing: A local grammar based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 58, 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, H., Zhang, Y., & Lu, X. (2021). Applying local grammars to the diachronic investigation of discourse acts in academic writing: The case of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 120–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I., & Fitzmaurice, S. (2007). Historical pragmatics: What it is and how to do it. In S. Fitzmaurice, & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Methods in historical pragmatics (pp. 11–36). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I., & Jucker, A. (2008). Speech acts now and then: Towards a pragmatic history of English. In A. Jucker, & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (pp. 1–23). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I., Jucker, A., & Tuominen, J. (Eds.). (2014). Diachronic corpus pragmatics. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Context, individual differences and pragmatic competence. Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, M. (2025). Local grammar and speech act analysis: A case study of compliments. Folia Linguistica. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). The argument culture: Stopping America’s war of words. Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. William Morrow.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tantucci, V., & Wang, A. (2024). British conversation is changing: Resonance and engagement in the BNC1994 and the BNC2014. Applied Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ton-Nu, A. (2024). Why is L2 pragmatics still a neglected area in EFL teaching? Uncovered stories from Vietnamese EFL teachers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toolan, M. (1996). Total speech: An integrational linguistic approach to language. Duke University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrent, T. T., Hoffmann, T., Almeida, A. L., & Turner, M. (Eds.). (2023). Copilots for linguists: AI, constructions, and frames. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints and apologies. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trotzke, A. (2024). Recent advances in the syntax of speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 234, 140–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, T., & Hartmann, S. (Eds.). (2023). Constructionist approaches: Past, present, future. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Usó-Juan, E. (2010). Requests: A sociopragmatic approach. In A. Martínez-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 237–256). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. D. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantic interface. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viana, V., Zyngier, S., & Barnbrook, G. (Eds.). (2011). Perspectives on corpus linguistics. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vicentini, A. (2003). The economy principle in language: Notes and observations from early modern English grammars. Mots Palabras Words, 3, 37–57. [URL]
Warren, M., & Leung, M. (2016). Do collocational frameworks have local grammars? International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weisser, M. (2003). SPAACy — A semi-automated tool for annotating dialogue acts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(1), 63–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Speech act annotation. In K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook (pp. 84–113). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). DART — The dialogue annotation and research tool. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 12(2), 355–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Annotating the ICE corpora pragmatically — preliminary issues & steps. ICAME Journal, 41, 181–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). The DART annotation scheme: Form, appliability and application. Studia Neophilologica, 91(2), 131–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Speech acts in corpus pragmatics: Making the case for an extended taxonomy. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 25(4), 400–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, A. (2004). The intonation of Please-requests: A corpus-based study. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(9), 1521–1549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, G. (2018). Sincerity in medieval English language and literature. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, J. (2010). The “triple articulation” of language. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2932–2944. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 463–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ye, J., Huan, C., & Su, H. (2024). Local grammar approach to critical discourse analysis: A case study on the discursive representation of climate change in the UN news. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, D., Su, H., & Bondi, M. (2024a). Developing local grammars of speech acts in Italian: The case of apology. Lingua, 299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, L., & Su, H. (2021). Applying local grammars in EAP teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Jiang, R., & Zhang, J. (2024). ‘Table 1 shows that…’: A local grammar of graphic data commentary in discourse of Economics. English for Specific Purposes, 74, 68–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. (2025). ‘X can be classified into … ’: A local grammar of classification in academic discourse and its implications for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 73, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Su, H. (2022). “We define X as …”: A local grammar of definition in linguistics research articles and its pedagogical value. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 59, 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). (Mis)use of definition in Chinese EFL postgraduate students’ academic writing: A local grammar based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 65, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue