In:Investigating Wikipedia: Linguistic corpus building, exploration and analysis
Edited by Céline Poudat, Harald Lüngen and Laura Herzberg
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 121] 2024
► pp. 205–234
Chapter 8Disagreements and conflicts in Wikipedia talk pages
Published online: 31 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.121.08pou
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.121.08pou
Abstract
Collaborative situations inevitably generate disagreements and even conflicts. Over
the last decade, Wikipedia has been extensively studied, but mostly from the perspective of social sciences. Conflicts
have been described in great detail, along with phenomena such as quality, coordination, or in relation to maintenance work. However, most
of the studies available did not define, nor measure conflicts from a linguistic perspective. The following chapter
concentrates on two types of speech acts, which we
consider to be of particular significance, namely speech acts expressing disagreement on the one hand, and a set of
clearly offensive speech acts, such as insults or
derogatory language, on the other hand. Our approach is corpus-based: the two typologies which are presented in our chapter were developed based on an annotation of speech acts in a corpus of Wikipedia discussions in French, partly extracted from the
WikiDemoCorpus. The chapter then expands on the annotation which was carried out, and on the specific features of
conflicts and disagreements in Wikipedia.
Keywords: Wikipedia talk pages, pragmatics, conflicts, disagreements, annotation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A corpus representative of conflicts in Wikipedia
talks
- 2.1Conflict regulation in Wikipedia
- 2.2Page selection
- 3.Conflicts in Wikipedia talks: Categories of disagreement and verbal attacks
- 3.1Thread-level annotation
- 3.2Disagreements
- 3.3Verbal attacks
- 4.Results
- 4.1Disagreements
- 4.2Verbal attacks
- 4.2.1Reproaches
- 4.2.2Insults
- 4.2.3Threats
- 5.Discussion and future perspectives
Notes References
References (58)
Adler, Thomas B., De Alfaro, Luca, Mola-Velasco, Santiago M., Rosso, Paolo, & West, Andrew G. 2011. Wikipedia
vandalism detection: Combining natural language, metadata, and reputation
features. In Proceedings of the 12th International
Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text
Processing, Volume 1 Part II, 277–288.
Angouri, Jo & Locher, Miriam A. 2012. Theorising
disagreement. Journal of
Pragmatics, 44(12): 1549–1553.
Arazy, Ofer, Yeo, Lisa & Nov, Oded. 2013. Stay
on the Wikipedia task: When task-related disagreements slip into personal and procedural
conflicts. Journal of the Association for Information Science &
Technology 64(8): 1634–1648.
Auray, Nicolas, Hurault-Plantet, Martine, Poudat, Céline & Jacquemin, Bernard. 2009. La
négociation des points de vue. Une cartographie sociale des conflits et des querelles dans le Wikipédia
francophone. Réseaux 154(2): 15–50.
Borillo, Andrée. 2004. Les
‘Adverbes d’opinion forte’ selon moi, à mes yeux, à mon avis,… : Point de vue subjectif et effet
d’atténuation. Langue
Française 142(2): 31–40.
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness
in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series
167]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2010. Researching
impoliteness and rudeness: Issues and
definitions. In Interpersonal
Pragmatics, Miriam A. Locher & Sage L. Graham (eds), 101–136. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brandes, Ulrik & Lerner, Jürgen. 2007. Revision
and co-revision in Wikipedia detecting clusters of
interest. In Proceedings of International Workshop
Bridging the Gap Between Semantic Web and Web 2.0, 4th European Semantic Web Conference
(ESWC´07). Konstanz: University of Kontanz. 〈[URL]〉 (2 June 2024).
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1978. Universals
in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions
and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Esther N. Goody (ed.), 56–311. Cambridge: CUP.
Cardon, Dominique & Levrel, Julien. 2009. La
vigilance participative. Une interprétation de la gouvernance de
Wikipédia. Réseaux 154: 51–89.
Clark, Justin, Faris, Robert, Gasser, Urs, Holland, Adam, Ross, Hilary & Tilton, Casey. 2019. Content
and Conduct: How English Wikipedia Moderates Harmful Speech. The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection, Research Publication 2019(5).
Clemen, Gudrun. 1997. The
concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. Research in text
theory, 235–248.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards
an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of
Pragmatics, 25(3): 349–367.
Delkhissi, Laurie. 2016. Qu’est-ce
t’as été te mêler de ça ?! Une ‘nouvelle’ structure pour les questions rhétoriques
conflictuelles. Journal of French Language
Studies 26(3): 279–298.
Denis, Alexandre, Quignard, Matthieu, Fréard, Dominique, Détienne, Françoise, Baker, Michael & Barcellini, Flore. 2012. Détection
de conflits dans les communautés épistémiques en ligne. TALN — Actes de la Conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles — 2012.
Doury, Marianne & Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2011. La
place de l’accord dans l’argumentation polémique: Le cas du débat Sarkozy/Royal
(2007). A
Contrario 2: 63–87.
Dummett, Michael. 1975. What
is a theory of meaning? In Mind and
Language, Samuel Guttenplan (ed.), 97–138. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fraser, Bruce. 2010. Hedging
in political discourse: The Bush 2007 press
conferences. In Perspectives in Politics and
Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture
36], Urszula Okulska & Piotr Cap (ed.), 201–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goffman, Erving. 1955. On
face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry:
Journal for the Study of Interpersonal
Processes 18: 213–231.
Hardaker, Claire. 2010. Trolling
in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic
definitions. Journal of Politeness
Research 6(2), 215–242.
Hyland, Ken. 1998. Hedging
in Scientific Research Articles [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series
54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jemielniak, Dariusz. 2014. Common
Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Keck, Ana Claudia. 2022. Le
marquage du doute exprime-t-il vraiment l’incertitude? Une approche énonciative, interactionnelle et
multimodale de je suis pas certain. SHS Web of Conferences
146, ICODOC 2021: Le savoir au prisme du langage. Acquisition, transmission,
manifestations.
. 2016. Le
désaccord, réaction “non préférée”? Le cas des débats présidentiels. Cahiers de
Praxématique 67.
Kittur, Aniket, Chi, Ed H., & Suh, Bongwon. 2009. What’s
in Wikipedia? Mapping topics and conflict using socially annotated category
structure. In CHI ’09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems, 1509–1512. New York NY: ACM.
Kittur, Aniket, & Kraut, Robert E. 2008. Harnessing
the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through
coordination. In CSCW ’08: Proceedings of the 2008
ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative
Work, 37–46. New York NY: ACM.
2010. Beyond
Wikipedia: Coordination and conflict in online production
groups. In CSCW ’10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM
Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative
Work, 215–224. New York NY: ACM.
Kittur, Aniket, Suh, Bongwon, Pendleton, Bryan A., & Chi, E. H. 2007. He
Says, She Says : Conflict and Coordination in
Wikipedia. In CHI ’07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems, 453–462. New York NY: ACM.
Laforest, Marty, & Moïse, Claudine. 2013. Entre
reproche et insulte, comment définir les actes de
condamnation ? In Violences verbales. Analyses,
enjeux et perspectives, Béatrice Fracchiolla, Claudine Moïse & Nathalie Auger (eds), 85–105. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Margutti, Piera. 2011. Teachers’
reproaches and managing discipline in the classroom: When teachers tell students what they do
‘wrong’. Linguistics and
Education 22(4): 310–329.
Mateo, José & Yus, Francisco Ramos. 2013. Towards
a cross-cultural pragmatic taxonomy of insults . Journal of Language Aggression
and
Conflict 1(1): 87–114.
Moeschler, Jacques & de Spengler, Nina. 1982. La
concession ou la réfutation interdite. Cahiers de Linguistique
Française 4: 7–36.
Padilla García, Xose A. & Alvarado Ortega, Belén. 2010. Being
polite through irony. In Dialogue in Spanish: Studies
in Functions and Contexts [Dialogue Studies 7], Dale Koike & Lidia Rodríguez-Alfano (eds), 55–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Perelman, Chaïm & Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1958. La
nouvelle rhétorique. Traité de
l’argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing
and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn
shapes. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in
Conversation Analysis, Atkinson, Maxwell & Heritage, John (eds), 57–101. Cambridge: CUP.
Poudat, Céline. 2018. Explorer
les désaccords dans les fils de discussion du Wikipédia
francophone. In Proceedings of the JADT 2018,
Rome, Vol. 2: 602–610.
Poudat, Céline, Grabar, Natalia, Paloque-Berges, Camille, Chanier, Thirry & Kun, Jin. 2017. Wikiconflits:
Un corpus de discussions éditoriales conflictuelles du Wikipédia
francophone. In Corpus de communication médiée par
les réseaux: Construction, structuration, analyse, Ciara R. Wigham & Gudrun Ledegen (eds), 19–36. Paris: l’Harmattan.
Poudat, Céline & Ho-Dac, Lydia-Mai. 2019. Désaccords
et conflits dans le Wikipédia francophone. In Accord
et désaccord [Travaux linguistiques du Cerlico 29], Gilles Col & Sylvie Hanote (eds), 155–176. Poitiers: Universté de Poitiers.
Rott, Hans. 2007. Disagreement
and misunderstanding across cultures. In Cultures:
Conflict – Analysis – Dialogue, Proceedings of the 29th International Wittgenstein
Symposium, Christian Kanzian & Edmund Runggaldier (eds), 261–275. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Schneider, Stefan & Glikman, Julie. 2015. Origin
and development of French parenthetical
verbs. In Parenthetical
Verbs [Linguistische Arbeiten 557], Stefan Schneider, Julie Glikman & Mathieu Avanzi (eds), 163–188. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Stvilia, Besiki, Twidale, Michael B., Smith, Linda C., & Gasser, Les. 2008. Information
quality work organization in Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and
Technology 59(6), 983–1001.
Suh, Bongwon, Chi, Ed H., Pendleton, Bryan A., & Kittur, Aniket. 2007. Us
vs. them: Understanding social dynamics in Wikipedia with revert graph
visualizations. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology,
2007, 163–170. IEEE.
Viégas, Fernanda B., Wattenberg, Martin & Dave, Kushal. 2004. Studying
cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow
isualizations. In CHI ’04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems, 575–582. New York NY: ACM.
Viégas, Fernanda B., Wattenberg, Martin, Kriss, Jesse & van Ham, Frank. 2007. Talk
before you type: Coordination in Wikipedia. In 40th
Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,
2007, 78–78. IEEE.
