Cover not available

In:English Prosody in First and Second Language Speakers: A contrastive interlanguage analysis across intonational dimensions
Karin McClellan
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 120] 2024
► pp. 239–292

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

References

Published online: 7 November 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.120.refs
Abrahamsson, Niclas & Hyltenstam, Kenneth. 2008. The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(4): 481–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Age of L2 acquisition and native-likeness: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 59(2): 249–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abu-Al-Makarem, Ali & Petrosino, Linda. 2007. Reading and spontaneous speaking fundamental frequency of young Arabic men for Arabic and English languages: A comparative study. Perceptual and Motor Skills 105(2): 572–580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aguilar, Lauren, Downey, Geraldine, Krauss, Robert, Pardo, Jennifer, Lane, Sean & Bolger, Niall. 2016. A dyadic perspective on speech accommodation and social connection: Both partners’ rejection sensitivity matters. Journal of Personality 84(2): 165–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alcoba, Santiago & Murillo, Julio. 1998. Intonation in Spanish. In Intonation Systems. A Survey of Twenty Languages, Daniel Hirst & Albert Di Cristo (eds), 152–166. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, Scott. 1990. The rise of New Zealand intonation. In New Zealand Ways of Speaking English, Allan Bell & Janet Holmes (eds), 115–128. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1987. Prosodic Patterns in Spoken English: Studies in the Correlation between Prosody and Grammar for Text-to-speech Conversation. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, Janet, Johnson, Ruth & Koehler, Kenneth 1992. The relationship between native speaker judgments of non-native pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning 42(4): 529–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andreeva, Bistra & Barry, William J. 2012. Fine phonetic detail in prosody. Cross-language differences need not inhibit communication. In Understanding Prosody: The Role of Context, Function and Communication, Oliver Niebuhr & Anita Steube (eds), 259–288. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andreeva, Bistra & Dimitrova, Snezhina. 2022a. Prosodic characteristics of Bulgarian-accented German. In Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung, Tagungsband der 33. Konferenz Sønderborg, 220–227. Dresden, Germany.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022b. The influence of L1 prosody on Bulgarian-accented German and English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody, 2022, 764–768. Lisbon, Portugal. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andreeva, Bistra, & Snezhina Dimitrova. 2022c. L1 influences on Bulgarian-accented German: Prosodic units and prenuclear pitch accents. Languages 7(4): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andreeva, Bistra, Demenko, Grazyna, Wolska, Magdalena, Möbius, Bernd, Zimmerer, Frank, Jügler, Jeanin, Oleskowicz-Popiel, Magdalena & Trouvain, Jürgen. 2014a. Comparison of pitch range and pitch variation in Slavic and Germanic languages. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014, 776–780. Dublin, Ireland. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andreeva, Bistra, Demenko, Grazyna, Möbius, Bernd, Zimmerer, Frank, Jügler, Jeanin & Oleskowicz-Popiel, Magdalena. 2014b. Differences of pitch profiles in Germanic and Slavic languages. In Proceedings of the 15th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2014, 1307–1311. Singapore. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrew, Martin. 2011. ‘The real world’: Lived literacy practices and cultural learning from community placement. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 34(2): 219–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anufryk, Volha. 2008. Effects of language ability on phonetic and phonological variation of English intonation by German speakers. In Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production, ISSP 2008, 233–235. Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Intonational Variation and Pronunciation Aptitude. PhD dissertation, Stuttgart University.
Anufryk, Volha & Dogil, Grzegorz. 2009. On prosodic variation and pronunciation aptitude: A case study of German speakers of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(4): 2757. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anufryk, Volha, Jilka, Matthias & Dogil, Grzegorz. 2008. Prosodic variation in L2: A case study of Germans speaking English. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, ISCA 2008, 21–24. Athens, Greece.
Aoyama, Katsura & Guion, Susan G. 2007. Prosody in second language acquisition. Acoustic analyses of duration and F0 range. In Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning. In Honour of James Emil Flege [Language Learning & Language Teaching 17], Ocke-Schwen Bohn & Murray J. Munro (eds), 281–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archibald, John. 1993a. The learnability of English metrical parameters by Spanish speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics 31(2): 129–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993b. Metrical phonology and the acquisition of L2 stress. In Confluence: The Interaction of Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Speech Pathology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 4], Fred R. Eckman (ed.), 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. A formal model of learning L2 prosodic phonology. Second Language Research 10(3): 215–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. The acquisition of second language phrasal stress: A pilot study. In Focus on Phonological Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 16], Stephen J. Hannahs & Martha Young-Scholten (eds), 263–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Advanced-level L2 phonology. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, Paul A. Malovrh & Alessandro G. Benati (eds), 241–263. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armstrong, Meghan E., Piccinini, Page E. & Ritchart, Amanda. 2015. The phonetics and distribution of non-question rises in two varieties of American English. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, Maria Wolters, Judy Livingstone, Bernie Beattie, Rachel Smith, Mike MacMahon, Jane Stuart-Smith & Jim Scobbie (eds), 1–5. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Arvaniti, Amalia. 2011. The representation of intonation. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds), 757–780. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. The autosegmental-metrical model of intonational phonology. In Prosodic Theory and Practice, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Jonathan Barnes (eds), 1–45. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Atkins, Madeleine. 2016. Uptalk in Southern British English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 8, 153–157. Boston, MA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Baltazani, Mary. 2005. Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. In Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 84–117. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Fletcher, Janet. 2021. The autosegmental-metrical theory of intonational phonology. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody, Carlos Gussenhoven & Aoju Chen (eds), 78–95. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Garding, Gina. 2007. Dialectal variation in the rising accents of American English. In Laboratory Phonology 9, Jennifer Cole & José Ignacio Hualde (eds), 547–576. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asch, Madeline & Brogan, Franny D. 2022. Uptalk in Chicano Southern California English. American Speech 98(3): 264–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, J. James & Garcia, Ramiro. 1969. The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal 53(5): 334–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Astruc, Lluïsa & del Mar Vanrell, Maria. 2016. Intonational phonology and politeness in L1 and L2 Spanish. Probus 28(1): 91–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atterer, Michaela & Ladd, D. Robert. 2004. On the phonetics and phonology of “segmental anchoring” of f0: Evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics 32(2): 177–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auran, Cyril & Hirst, Daniel. 2004. Anaphora, connectives and resetting: Prosodic and pragmatic parameters interactions in the marking of discourse structure. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody, 2004, 259–262. Nara, Japan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. 1975. How to do Things with Words, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ayers, Gayle M. 1994. Discourse functions of pitch range in spontaneous and read speech. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 44(1): 1–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babel, Molly. 2010. Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society 39(4): 437–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics 40(1): 177–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babel, Molly & Bulatov, Dasha. 2012. The role of fundamental frequency in phonetic accommodation. Language and Speech 55(2): 231–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babel, Molly, McGuire, Grant, Walters, Sophia & Nicholls, Alice. 2014. Novelty and social preference in phonetic accommodation. Laboratory Phonology 5(1): 123–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Backman, Nancy. 1979. Intonation errors in second-language pronunciation of eight Spanish-speaking adults learning English. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin Utrecht 4(2): 239–265.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bacon, Susan M.C. 1992. The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in second-language listening. Modern Language Journal 76(2): 160–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bacon, Susan M.C. & Finnemann, Michael D. 1992. Sex differences in self-reported beliefs about foreign-language learning and authentic oral and written input. Language Learning 42(4): 471–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baese-Berk, Melissa M. & Morrill, Tuuli H. 2015. Speaking rate consistency in native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 138(3): 223–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baills, Florence, Alazard-Guiu, Charlotte & Prieto, Pilar. 2022. Embodied prosodic training helps improve accentedness and suprasegmental accuracy. Applied Linguistics 43(4): 776–804. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Ann. 2006. Ship or Sheep? Student’s Book. An Intermediate Pronunciation Course, 3rd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie (eds). 2022. Prosody Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barry, Angela. 2008. The Form, Function and Distribution of High Rising Intonation: A Comparative Study of HRT in Southern California and Southern British English. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barry, William & Andreeva, Bistra. 2001. Cross-language similarities and differences in spontaneous speech patterns. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31(1): 51–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batliner, Anton, Buckow, Jan, Huber, Richard, Warnke, Volker, Nöth, Elmar & Niemann, Heinrich. 2001. Boiling down prosody for the classification of boundaries and accents in German and English. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology 2001, 2781–2784. Aalborg, Denmark. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Cable, Thomas. 2013. A History of the English Language, 6th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumann, Stefan, Grice, Martine & Benzmüller, Ralf. 2001. GToBI – A phonological system for the transcription of German intonation. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2000, 21–28. Poznan, Poland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumann, Stefan, Mertens, Jane & Kalbertodt, Janina. 2021. The influence of informativeness on the prosody of sentence topics. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6(1): 1–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3(1): 255–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Venditti, Jennifer J. 2011. Intonation. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C.L. Yu (eds), 485–532. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., Hirschberg, Julia & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2005. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 9–54. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Ayers Elam, Gayle. 1997. Guidelines for ToBI labeling, version 3.0. Columbus, OH: Linguistics Department, Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Allan & Johnson, Gary. 1997. Towards a sociolinguistics of style. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beňuš, Štefan. 2014. Social aspects of entrainment in spoken interaction. Cognitive Computation 6(4): 802–813. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beňuš, Štefan, Reichel, Uwe D. & Mády, Katalin. 2014. Modeling accentual phrase intonation in Slovak and Hungarian. In Complex Visibles Out There [Olomouc Modern Language Series 4], Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds), 677–689. Olomouc, Czech Republic: Palacký University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, Winifred Strange (ed.), 171–204. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. & Tyler, Michael D. 2007. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning. In Honour of James Emil Flege [Language Learning & Language Teaching 17], Ocke-Schwen Bohn & Murray J. Munro (eds), 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas G. 1981. Normal acquisition processes explain the critical period for language learning. In Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude, Karl C. Diller (ed.), 176–198. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey N., Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 2002. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education ESL. Also published as: Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey N., Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 2021. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bielska, Joanna. 2009. Gender differences in strategy use and classroom task preferences of Polish EFL learners. In Practical Approaches to Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, Marta Navarro Coy (ed.), 113–127. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biersack, Sonja. 2002. Systematische Aussprachefehler deutscher Muttersprachler im Englischen: Eine phonetisch-phonologische Bestandaufnahme. Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München 39: 37–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biersack, Sonja, Kempe, Vera & Knapton, Lorna. 2005. Fine-tuning speech registers: A comparison of the prosodic features of child-directed and foreigner directed speech. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology 2005, 2401–2404. Lisbon, Portugal. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bigi, Brigitte. 2015. SPPAS – Multilingual approaches to the automatic annotation of speech. The Phonetician, International Society of Phonetic Sciences 111–112: 55–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilious, Frances R. & Krauss, Robert. M. 1988. Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication 8(3–4): 183–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bird, Elizabeth & Garellek, Marc. 2019. Dynamics of voice quality over the course of the English utterance. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2019, 2406–2410. Canberra, Australia.
Birdsong, David. 1999. Introduction: Whys and why nots of the Critical Period Hypothesis for second language acquisition. In Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, David Birdsong (ed.), 1–22. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Dominance and age in bilingualism. Applied Linguistics 35(4): 374–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bissiri, Maria Paola. 2013. Glottalization in German-accented English in relationship to phrase boundaries. In Systemtheorie Signalverarbeitung Sprachtechnologie. Rüdiger Hoffman zum 65. Geburtstag [Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation Band 68], Dieter Mehnert, Ulrich Kordon & Matthias Wolff (eds), 234–240. Dresden: TUD press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bissiri, Maria Paola & Volín, Jan. 2010. Prosodic structure as a predictor of glottal stops before word-initial vowels in Czech English. In Proceedings of Czech-German Workshop on Speech Processing 2010, 23–28. Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bissiri, Maria Paola, Lecumberri, Maria Luisa, Cooke, Martin & Volín, Jan. 2011. The role of word-initial glottal stops in recognizing English words. In Proceedings of the International Speech Communication Association 2011, 165–168. Firenze, Italy. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blaauw, Eleonora. 1994. The contribution of prosodic boundary markers to the perceptual difference between read and spontaneous speech. Speech Communication 14(4): 359–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2019. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer, version 6.1.03 [Computer program]. University of Amsterdam. < [URL]> (1 September 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1946. The intonation of quoted questions. Quarterly Journal of Speech 32(2): 197–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14(2–3): 109–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972. Around the edge of language: Intonation. In Intonation, Dwight Bolinger (ed.), 19–29. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Intonation and its Parts: Melody in Spoken English. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Intonation and its Uses. London: Arnold. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bongaerts, Theo. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, David Birdsong (ed.), 133–159. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bongaerts, Theo, Mennen, Susan & van der Slik, Frans. 2000. Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica 54(2): 298–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bongaerts, Theo, Planken Brigitte & Schils, Erik. 1995. Can late learners attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. In The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition, David Michael Singleton & Zsolt Lengyel (eds), 30–50. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bongaerts, Theo, van Summeren, Chantal, Planken, Brigitte & Schils, Erik. 1997. Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(4): 447–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourhis Richard Y. & Giles, Howard. 1977. The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations, Howard Giles (ed.), 119–135. New York, NY: European Association of Experimental Social Psychology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowden, Harriet Wood, Sanz, Cristina & Stafford, Catherine A. 2005. Individual differences: Age, sex, working memory, and prior knowledge. In Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory, and Practice, Cristina Sanz (ed.), 105–140. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowen, Donald J. 1956. A comparison of the intonation patterns of English and Spanish. Hispania 39(1): 30–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyle, Joseph P. 1987. Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning 37(2): 273–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brabcová, Katerina & Skarnitzl, Radek. 2018. Foreign or native-like? The attitudes of Czech EFL learners towards accents of English and their use as pronunciation models. Studie z aplikované lingvistiky – Studies in Applied Linguistics 9(1): 38–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradford, Barbara. 1997. Upspeak in British English. English Today 13(3): 29–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradlow, Ann R. & Bent, Tessa. 2008. Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition 106(2): 707–729. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brand, Christiane & Kämmerer, Susanne. 2006. The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage (LINDSEI): Compiling the German component. In Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy: New Resources, New Tools, New Methods, Sabine Braun, Kurt Kohn & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 127–140. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Angelika. 1995. Fundamental frequency – How speaker-specific is it? Studies in Forensic Phonetics, BEIPHOL 64: 9–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brazil, David. 1997. The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brazil, David, Coulthard, Malcolm & Johns, Catherine. 1980. Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnahan, Mary Jiang, Ohashi, Rie, Nebashi, Reiko, Liu, Wen Ying & Shearman, Sachiyo Morinaga. 2002. Attitudinal and affective response toward accented English. Language and Communication 22(2): 171–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britain, David. 1992. Linguistic change in intonation: The use of high rising terminals in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 4(1): 77–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Linguistic change in intonation: The use of high-rising terminals in New Zealand English. In The Sociolinguistics Reader, 1: Variation and Multilingualism, Peter Trudgill & Jenny Cheshire (eds), 213–239. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britain, David & Newman John. 1992. High rising terminals in New Zealand English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 22(1–2): 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugos, Alejna, Breen, Mara, Veilleux, Nanette, Barnes, Jonathan & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2018. Cue-based annotation and analysis of prosodic boundary events. In Proceedings of the International Speech Communication Association 2018, 245–249. Poznań, Poland. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, Gregory A. & Fox Tree, Jean E. 2005. Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech 48(3): 257–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, Pauline. 1980. Australian Questioning Intonation: An Addition to Speakers’ Response-seeking Repertoire. BA thesis, Australian National University.
Buck, Gavin. 2016. Systematic Transfer of ‘Uptalk’ from English (L1) to Spanish (L2) for Native English Speakers: A Developmental Study. BA thesis, University of Michigan.
Bundgaard-Nielsen, Rikke L., Best, Catherine T. & Tyler, Michael D. 2011. Vocabulary size is associated with L2 vowel perception performance in adult L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(3): 433–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, Rikke L., Best, Catherine T., Kroos, Christian & Tyler, Michael D. 2012. Second language learners’ vocabulary expansion is associated with improved second language vowel intelligibility. Applied Psycholinguistics 33(3): 643–664. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burdin, Rachel Steindel & Tyler, Joseph. 2018. Rises inform, and plateaus remind: Exploring the epistemic meanings of “list intonation” in American English. Journal of Pragmatics 136: 97–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busà, Maria Grazia & Urbani, Martina. 2011. A cross linguistic analysis of pitch range in English L1 and L2. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2011, 380–383. Hong Kong.
Buysse, Lieven. 2017. The pragmatic marker you know in learner Englishes. Journal of Pragmatics 121: 40–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bylund, Emanuel, Abrahamsson, Niclas & Hyltenstam, Kenneth. 2012. Does first language maintenance hamper native-likeness in a second language? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34(2): 215–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani. 1994. Relations of sex and dialect to reduction. Speech Communication 15(1–2): 39–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacioppo, John T. & Petty, Richard E. 1980. Sex differences in influenceability: Towards specifying the underlying processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6(4): 651–656. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Callies, Marcus. 2008. Easy to understand but difficult to use? Raising constructions and information packaging in the advanced learner variety. In Linking Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, María Belén Diez Bedmar & Szilvia Papp (eds), 201–226. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calhoun, Sasha & Schweitzer, Antje 2012. Can intonation contours be lexicalised? Implications for discourse meanings. In Prosody and Meaning [Interface Explorations 25], Gorka Elordieta & Pilar Prieto (eds.), 271–327. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 2011. Sociophonetics and sexuality: Discussion. American Speech 86(1): 98–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canellada, María Josefa & Madsen Kuhlmann, John. 1987. Pronunciación del español: Lengua hablada y literaria. Madrid: Castalia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cangemi, Francesco, Albert, Aviad & Grice, Martine. 2019. Modelling intonation: Beyond segments and tonal targets. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2019, Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds). 572–576. Melbourne, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.
Carrie, Erin. 2017. British is professional, American is urban: Attitudes towards English reference accents in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(2): 427–447. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cauvin, Évelyne. 2013. Intonational phrasing as a potential indicator for establishing prosodic learner profiles. In Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead [Corpora and Language in Use – Proceedings 1], Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 75–88. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cavé, Christian, Guaïtella, Isabelle, Bertrand, Roxane, Santi, Serge, Harlay, Francoise & Espesser, Robert. 1996. About the relationship between eyebrow movements and F0 variations. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 1996, 2175–2179. Philadelphia, PA.
Celce-Murcia, Marianne, Brinton, Donna M. & Goodwin, Janet. M. 2010. Teaching Pronunciation: A Course Book and Reference Guide. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cenoz, Jasone & García Lecumberri, Maria Luisa. 1999. The acquisition of English pronunciation: Learners’ views. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 9(1): 3–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1980. The Pear Stories. Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988. Linking intonation units in spoken English. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago, IL: The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, Francine & Richards, Brian J. 1995. The free conversation and the assessment of oral proficiency. The Language Learning Journal 11(1): 6–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chamonikolasová, Jana. 2017. Intonation in English and Czech Dialogues. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chartrand, Tanya L. & Bargh, John A. 1999. The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(6): 893–910. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Aoju. 2003. Language dependence in continuation intonation. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 1069–1072. Barcelona, Spain.
. 2007. Language-specificity in the perception of continuation intonation. In Tones and Tunes, II: Phonetic and Behavioural Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody, Carlos Gussenhoven & Tomas Riad (eds), 107–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning in a second language. Language Learning 59(2): 367–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Is there really an asymmetry in the acquisition of the focus-to-accentuation mapping? Lingua 120(8): 1926–1939. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Sally & Fon, Janice 2008. The peak alignment of prenuclear and nuclear accents among advanced L2 English learners. In Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2008 Conference, 643–646. Campinas, Brazil.
Ching, Marvin K L. 1982. The question intonation in assertions. American Speech 57(2): 95–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chipere, Ngoni. 2013. Sex differences in phonological awareness and reading ability. Language Awareness 23(3): 1–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chun, Dorothy M. 1998. Signal analysis software for teaching discourse intonation. Language Learning and Technology 2(1): 74–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Discourse Intonation in L2: From Theory and Research to Practice [Language Learning & Language Teaching 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chun, Dorothy M., Hardison, Debra M. & Pennington, Martha C. 2008. Technologies for prosody in context. Past and future of L2 research and practice. In Phonology and Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 36], Jette G. Hansen Edwards & Mary L. Zampini (eds), 323–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cid Uribe, Miriam & Roach, Peter. 1990. Spanish intonation: Design and implementation of a machine-readable corpus. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 20(2): 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1994. Discourse in production. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, Morton A. Gernsbacher (ed.), 985–1021. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Fox Tree, Jean E. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84(1): 73–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G. & Pisoni, David B. 2006. The Nationwide Speech Project: A new corpus of American English dialects. Speech Communication 48(6): 633–644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G. & Smiljanic, Rajka. 2011. Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. Journal Phonetics 39(2): 237–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Regional variation in temporal organization in American English. Journal of Phonetics 49: 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 2004. Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cogo, Alessia & Dewey, Martin. 2006. Efficiency in ELF communication: From pragmatic motives to lexico-grammatical innovation. In Nordic Journal of English Studies [Special Issue on ELF], Anna Mauranen & Maria Metsä-Ketelä (eds), 59–93. Göteborg: University of Göteborg. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonie & ’t Hart, Johan. 1967. On the anatomy of intonation. Lingua 19(1–2): 177–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1): 37–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura, Cuza, Alejandro & Mazzaro, Natalia. 2016a. Task-related effects in the prosody of Spanish heritage speakers and long-term immigrants. In Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 6], Meghan E. Armstrong, Nicholas Henrikesen & Maria del Mar Vanrell (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura, Klassen, Gabrielle, Patience, Matthew, Radu, Malina & Tararova, Olga. 2015. Increasing context: L2 production of English intonation by L1 Spanish and L1 Mandarin speakers. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–4. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
. 2016b. Task-effects in the L2 perception and production of English sentence-types by L1 Spanish speakers. In Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 8 Conference, 1–5. Boston, MA.
Colantoni, Laura, Gabrielle Klassen, Matthew Patience, Malina Radu, & Tararova, Olga. 2022. Perception and production of sentence types by Inuktitut-English bilinguals. Languages 7(3): 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conley, John M., O’Barr, William M. & Lind, Allan E. 1978. The power of language: Presentational style in the courtroom. Duke Law Journal 6: 1375–1399.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian (ed.). 2002. Portraits of the L2 User. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corder, Stephen Pit. 1967. The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5(4): 161–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, Albert, Pickering, Martin J. & Sorace, Antonella. 2008. Alignment in second language dialogue. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(4): 528–556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg.
Council of Europe 2020. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1986. An Introduction to English Prosody. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret. 1996. Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds), 11–56. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Courtney, Neil. 1996. The nature of Australian. English Today 12(2): 23-29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1994. Rises in English. In Studies in General and English Phonetics. Essays in honour of Professor J. D. O’Connor, Jack Windsor Lewis (ed.), 155–73. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Intonation, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Prosodic development. In Studies in First Language Development, Paul J. Fletcher & Michael Garman (eds), 174–197. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 6th edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cucchiarini, Catia, Strik Helmer & Boves, Lou. 2000. Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107(2): 989–999. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Mackey, Alison & Taguchi, Naoko. 2018. Second Language Pragmatics. From Theory to Research. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne & Swinney, David A. 1987. Prosody and the development of comprehension. Journal of Child Language 14(1): 145–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne, Dahan, Delphine & van Donselaar, Wilma. 1997. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech 40(2): 141–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dagut, Menachem & Laufer, Batia. 1985. Avoidance of phrasal verbs: A case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7(1): 73–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahmen, Silvia. 2013. Prosodie oder Segmente? Phonetische Untersuchungen zu Trainingseffekten bei Italienischen Deutschlernenden. PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.
Dahmen, Silvia, Grice, Martine & Roessig, Simon. 2023. Prosodic and segmental aspects of pronunciation training and their effects on L2. Languages 8(1): 74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dallaston, Katherine & Docherty, Gerard. 2020. The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE 15(3): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, Kaltenboeck, Gunther & Smit, Ute. 1997. Learner attitudes and L2 pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes 16(1): 115–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daly, Nicola & Warren, Paul. 2001. Pitching it differently in New Zealand English: Speaker sex and intonation patterns. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(1): 85–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneš, František. 1957. Intonace a věta ve spisovné čeŝtině [Intonation and the sentence in standard Czech]. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dankovičová, Jana. 1998. The Linguistic Basis of Articulation Rate Variation in Czech. PhD dissertation, Oxford University.
Dankovičová, Jana & Dellwo, Volker. 2007. Czech speech rhythm and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2007, 1241–1244. Saarbrücken, Germany.
Dauer, R. M. 1983. Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics 11(1): 51–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2019. The effects of pitch, gender, and prosodic context on the identification of creaky voice. Phonetica 76(4): 235–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Bot, Kees. 1983. Visual feedback of intonation, I: Effectiveness and induced practice behavior. Language and Speech 26(4): 331–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Bot, Kees & Mailfert, Kate. 1982. The teaching of intonation: Fundamental research and classroom applications. TESOL Quarterly 16(1): 71–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Cock, Sylvie. 2004. Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures (BELL) New Series 2: 225–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jong, Kenneth J. 2001. Rate-induced resyllabification revisited. Language and Speech 44(2): 197– 216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jong, Nivja H. 2016. Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The ffects of utterance boundaries and word frequency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jong, Nivja H., Pacilly, Jos & Heeren, Willemijn. 2021. PRAAT scripts to measure speed fluency and breakdown fluency in speech automatically. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 28(4): 456–476. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Leeuw, Esther. 2019. Native speech plasticity in the German-English late bilingual Stefanie Graf: A longitudinal study over four decades. Journal of Phonetics 73: 24–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Leeuw, Esther, Mennen, Ineke & Scobbie, James M. 2012. Singing a different tune in your native language: First language attrition of prosody. International Journal of Bilingualism 16(1): 101–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Looze, Céline, Scherer, Stefan, Vaughan, Brian & Campbell, Nick. 2014. Investigating automatic measurements of prosodic accommodation and its dynamics in social interaction. Speech Communication 58: 11–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, Robert M., Alf-Shabtay, Iris & Ravid, Dorit. 2010. Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 31(3): 413–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, Elizabeth, Avanzi, Mathieu & Herment, Sophie (eds). 2015. Prosody and Languages in Contact: L2 Acquisition, Attrition, Languages in Multilingual Situations. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1963. Comparing the prosodic features of English, German, Spanish and French. International Review of Applied Linguistics 1(3): 193–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1966. A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 4(3): 183–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre, Poenack, Elmer & Olsen, Carroll. 1965. Some characteristics of German intonation for the expression of continuation and finality. Phonetica 13: 134–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dellwo, Volker. 2010. Influences of Speech rate on the Acoustic Correlates of Speech Rhythm: An Experimental Phonetic Study on Acoustic and Perceptual Evidence. PhD dissertation, University of Bonn.
Derwing, Tracey M & Munro, Murray J. 1997. Accent, intelligibility and comprehensibility. Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(1): 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, Tracey M. & Munro, Murray J. 2013. The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning 63(2): 163–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Pronunciation Fundamentals. Evidence-based Perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research [Language Learning & Language Teaching 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, Tracey M. & Rossiter, Marian J. 2003. The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning 13(1): 1–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, Tracey M., Diepenbroek, Lori G. & Foote, Jennifer A. 2013. How well do general-skills ESL textbooks address pronunciation? TESL Canada Journal 30(1): 22–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, Tracey M., Munro, Murray J. & Wiebe, Grace. 1998. Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning 48(3): 393–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, Tracey M., Munro, Murray J., Thomson, Ronald I. & Rossiter, Marian J. 2009. The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31(4): 533–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc, Macintyre, Peter, Boudreau, Carmen & Dewaele, Livia. 2016. Do girls have all the fun? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition 2(1): 41–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Gioacchino, Martina & Crook Jessop, Lorena. 2011. Uptalk – Towards a quantitative analysis. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 33: 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diehl, Randy L., Lindblom Björn, Hoemeke Kathryn A. & Fahey, Richard P. 1996. On explaining certain male-female differences in the phonetic realization of vowel categories. Journal of Phonetics 24(2): 187–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dietrich, Rainer, Klein, Wolfgang & Noyau, Colette. 1995. The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, Christel, Krahmer, Emiel & Swerts, Marc. 2006. Manipulating uncertainty – The contribution of different audiovisual prosodic cues to the perception of confidence. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Speech Prosody, 1–5. Dresden, Germany.
Dilley, Laura & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 1995. Variability in glottalization of word onset vowels in American English. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 1995, 586–589. Stockholm, Sweden.
Dilley, Laura, Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, & Ostendorf, Mari. 1996. Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics 24(4): 423–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dombrowski, Ernst & Niebuhr, Oliver. 2005. Acoustic patterns and communicative functions of phrase-final rises in German: Activating and restricting contours. Phonetica 62(2–4): 176–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Shaping phrase-final rising intonation in German. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Speech Prosody, 1–4. Chicago, IL.
Dörnyei, Zoltan & Clément, Richard. 2001. Motivational characteristics of learning different target languages: Results of a nationwide survey. In Motivation and Second Language Acquisition, Zoltan Dornyei & Richard Schmidt (eds), 399–432. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Douglas, Nick. 2017. Uptalk actually serves a powerful purpose. 31 May2017. < [URL]> (10 August 2023).
Dragojevic, Marko & Giles, Howard. 2016. I don’t like you because you’re hard to understand: The role of processing fluency in the language attitudes process. Human Communication Research 42(3): 396–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Cummings, Susanna, Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan & Paolino, Danae. 1992. Discourse Transcription [Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 4]. Santa Barbara, CA: Department of Linguistics, UCSB.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duběda, Tomáš. 2006. Prosodic boundaries in Czech: An experiment based on delexicalized speech. In Proceedings of the 9th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2006, 309–312. Pittsburg, PA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Czech intonation: A tonal approach. Slovo a Slovesnost 75(2): 83–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duběda, Tomáš & Mády, Katalin. 2010. Nucleus position within the intonation phrase: A typological study of English, Czech and Hungarian. In Proceedings of the 11th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2010, 4 Vols., 126–129. Makuhari, Chiba, Japan.
Dumont, Amandine. 2017. The contribution of learner corpora to the substantiation of fluency levels. In Language, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation, Pieter de Haan, Rina de Vries & Sanne van Vuuren (eds), 281–308. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna & Przedlacka, Joanna. (eds). 2008. English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, 2nd edn. Hamburg: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. 1978. Sex differences in influenceability. Psychological Bulletin 85(1): 86–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Podesva, Robert J. 2011. Sociophonetics and sexuality: Toward a symbiosis of sociolinguistics and laboratory phonology. American Speech 86(1): 6–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, Hartwig & Barry, William. 2002. The Phonetics and Phonology of English and Pronunciation: A Coursebook. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckman, Fred R. 1977. Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27(2): 315–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. A functional-typological approach to second language acquisition theory. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds), 195–211. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edelsky, Carole. 1979. Question intonation and sex roles. Language in Society 8(1): 15–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edlund, Jens, Heldner, Mattias & Hirschberg, Julia. 2009. Pause and gap length in face-to-face interaction. In Proceedings of the 10th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2009, 2779–2782. Brighton, UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Education First. 2011–2015. EF EPI: EF English Proficiency Index (five editions). < [URL]> (1 September 2019).
Edwards, Alison & Fuchs, Robert. 2018. A cluster analysis of attitudes to English in Germany and the Netherlands. World Englishes 37(4): 653–667. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehrman, Madeline & Oxford, Rebecca. 1989. Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal 72(3): 253–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elliott, Raymond A. 1995. Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal 79(3): 356–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elvira-García, Wendy. 2016. La entonación en el aula de ELE. In Dossier del XXV Encuentro Práctico de Profesores de ELE, Neus Sans Baulenas & Begoña Montmany (eds), 41–47. Barcelona: Difusión Publishing Company and International House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eriksson, Anders & Heldner, Mattias. 2015. The acoustics of word stress in English as a function of stress level and speaking style. In Proceedings of the 16th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2015, 41–45. Dresden, Germany.
Eskenazi, Maxine. 1999. Using automatic speech processing for foreign language pronunciation tutoring: Some issues and a prototype. Language Learning & Technology 2(2): 62–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esser, Jürgen. 1978. Contrastive intonation of German and English. Phonetica 35(1): 41–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva & Prieto, Pilar. 2010. Castilian Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano (eds), 17–48. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva. 2008. Modelling final declarative intonation in English and Spanish. In Estudios de FilologíaInglesa. Homenaje a la Dra. Asunción Alba Pelayo, María Teresa Gibert & Laura Alba-Juez (eds), 109–127. Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The evaluation of intonation: Pitch range differences in English and Spanish. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series242], Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds), 179–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva & Prieto, Pilar. 2008. La notación prosódica del español: Una revisión del Sp_ToBI. Estudios de Fonética Experimental 17: 265–283.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Euler, Sasha 2014. Approaches to pronunciation teaching: History and recent developments. In Recent Developments in Applied Phonetics [Studies in Linguistics and Methodology 6], Jolanta Szpyra-Kozłowska, Ewa Guz, Piotr Steinbrich & Radosław Święciński (eds), 35–78. Wydawnictwo: KUL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Face, Timothy L. 2001. Focus and early peak alignment in Spanish intonation. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 13(2): 223–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Face, Timothy L. 2002. Intonational marking of contrastive focus in Madrid Spanish. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Face, Timothy L. 2003. Intonation in Spanish declaratives: Differences between lab speech and spontaneous speech. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2: 115–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. F0 peak height and the perception of sentence type in Castilian Spanish. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 2(6): 49–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. 1997. The African contribution to southern states English. In Language Variety in the South Revisited, Cynthia Bernstein, Thomas E. Nunally & Robin Sabino (eds), 123–139. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1971. Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, Dell H. Hymes (ed.), 141–150. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández, Julieta & Staples, Shelley. 2021. Pragmatic approaches. In Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora, Nicole Tracy-Ventura & Magali Paquot (eds), 240–251. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline, Hörnig, Robin & Pahaut, Serge. 2011. Correlates of phrasing in French and German from an experiment with semi-spontaneous speech. In Intonational Phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-linguistic and Bilingual Studies [Hamburg Studies in Multilingualism 10], Christoph Gabriel & Conxita Lleó (eds), 11–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fey, Fabian & Lewandowski, Natalie. 2020. Uptalk in German: Investigation on the GECO database. In Proceedings of the Phonetics and Phonology in the German Language Area, P & P 14, 54–57. Vienna, Austria.
Flaig, Stefanie & Zerbian, Sabine. 2016. Rising intonation in statements of German speakers of English as a foreign language. Poster presented at the 7th conference on Tone and Intonation in Europe 2016 in Canterbury, UK.
Flege, James E. 1988. Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84: 70–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. Second language speech learning theory, findings and problems. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-linguistic Research, Winifred Strange (ed.), 233–277. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Give input a chance! In Input matters in SLA, Thorsten Piske & Martha Young-Scholten (eds), 175–190. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. The role of phonetic category formation in second language speech acquisition. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Second Language Speech 2016, 1–121. Aarhus, Denmark.
2018. How the revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r) works for stop consonants. In Proceedings of Research Frontiers of Second Language Speech 2018, 1–114. Nanjing, China.
2019. A non-critical period for second-language learning. In A Sound Approach to Language Matters. In Honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn, Anne Mette Nyvad, Míša Hejná, Anders Højen, Anna B. Jespersen & Mette Hjortshøj Sørensen (eds), 501–541. Aarhus: Department of English, Aarhus University. < [URL]> (19 April 2024).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, James. E. & Bohn, Ocke-Schwen. 2021. The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress, Ratree Wayland (ed.), 3–83. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, James E. & Fletcher, Kathryn L. 1992. Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91(1): 370–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, James E. & MacKay, Ian R. 2004. Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(1): 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, James E., Bohn, Ocke-Schwen & Jang, Sunyoung. 1997a. Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics 25(4): 437–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, James E., Frieda, Elaina M. & Nozawa, Takeshe. 1997b. Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics 25(2): 169–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, James E., MacKay, Ian R.A. & Piske, Thorsten. 2002. Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics 23(4): 567–598. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, James E., Munro, Murray & MacKay, Ian. 1995. Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(5): 3125–3134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fletcher, Janet. 2005. Compound rises and “uptalk” in spoken English dialogues. In Proceedings of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2005, 1381–1384. Lisbon, Portugal.
Fletcher, Janet & Loakes, Debbie. 2006. Patterns of rising and falling in Australian English. In Proceedings of the 11th Australian Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Paul Warren & Catherine I. Watson (eds), 42–47. Auckland, New Zealand.
Fletcher, Janet, Grabe, Esther & Warren, Paul. 2005. Intonational variation in four dialects of English: the high rising tone. In Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 390–409. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne & Manuel, Sharon. 1991. Age-dependent effects in language acquisition: An evaluation of “Critical Period” hypotheses. In Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the Second Language, [Language Acquisition & Language Disorders 3], Lynn Eubank (ed.), 117–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar and Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134–184. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, Pauline & Tavakoli, Parvaneh. 2009. Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity. Language Learning 59(4): 866–896. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, Pauline & Snyder Ohta, Amy. 2005. Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics 26(3): 402–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile & Jun, Sun-Ah. 1998. Rate effects on French intonation: Prosodic organization and phonetic realization. Journal of Phonetics 26(1): 45–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 2003. Chicano English in Context. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Anthony. 1981. Fall-rise intonations in German and English. In Contrastive Aspects of English and German, Charles V.J. Russ (ed.), 55–72. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. German Intonation: An Outline. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure. The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, John. 2003. Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models. Journal of Statistical Software 8 (15): 1-27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Robert Allen, Jacewicz, Ewa & Hart, Jessica. 2013. Pitch pattern variations in three regional varieties of American English. In Proceedings of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2013, 123–127. Lyon, France.
Freed, Barbara F., Segalowitz, Norman & Dewey, Dan P. 2004. Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(2): 275–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedberg, Heather, Litman, Diane & Paletz, Susannah. 2012. Lexical entrainment and success in student engineering groups. In Proceedings of theIEEE Workshop onSpoken Language Technology 2012, 404–409. Miami, FL.
Friginal, Eric, Lee, Joseph, Polat, Brittany & Roberson, Audrey. 2017. Exploring Spoken English Learner Language from Corpora: Learner Talk. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frota, Sonia, D’Imperio, Mariapaola, Elordieta, Gorka, Prieto, Pilar & Vigário, Marina. 2007. The phonetics and phonology of intonational phrasing in Romance. In Segmental and Prosodic Issues in Romance Phonology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 282],Pilar Prieto, Joan Mascaró & Maria-Josep Solé (eds), 131–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert. 2018. Pitch range, dynamism and level in postcolonial varieties of English: A comparison of educated Indian English and British English. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody, 893–897. Poznań, Poland.
Fujisaki, Hiroya. 1983. Dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency in speech and singing. In The Production of Speech, Peter F. MacNeilage (ed.), 39–55. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabriel, Christoph & Lleó, Conxita. 2011. Intonational Phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-linguistic and Bilingual Studies [Hamburg Sudies in Multilinguialism 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Lecumberri, Maria Luisa, Cooke, Martin & Wester, Mirjam. 2017. A bi-directional task-based corpus of learners’ conversational speech. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2): 175–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garellek, Marc & Keating, Patricia. 2015. Phrase-final creak: Articulation, acoustics, and distribution. Tutotialat the 2015 annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 1–35. Portland, OR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, Susan M., Behney, Jennifer & Plonsky, Luke. 2013. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbon, Dafydd. 1998. Intonation in German. In Intonation Systems. A Survey of Twenty Languages, Daniel Hirst & Albert di Cristo (eds), 78–95. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, Judy B. 2008. Teaching Pronunciation: Using the Prosody Pyramid. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giles, Howard & Powesland, Peter. 1997. Accommodation Theory. In Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook, Nikolas Coupland & Adam Jaworsky (eds), 232–239. New York, NY: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Coupland, Justine & Coupland, Nikolas. 1991. Accommodation Theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Contexts of Accommodation, Howard Giles, Justine Coupland & Nikolas Coupland (eds), 1–68. Cambridge:CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilles, Peter. 2005. Regionale Prosodie im Deutschen. Varibilität in der Intonation von Abschluss und Weiterweisung. In Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 6, Peter Gilles (ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, De Cock, Sylvie & Granger, Sylviane (eds). 2010. LINDSEI: Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, Jean-Philippe. 2011. EasyAlign: An automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat. Proceedings of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2011, 3233–3236. Firenze, Italy.
Goldman-Eisler, Frieda. 1968. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Ardeo, Joseba Mikel. 2003. Attitude towards English and ESP acquisition as an L2 or L3 at university. Ibérica 6: 109–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Götz, Sandra. 2013. Fluency in Native and Nonnative English Speech [Studies in Corpus Linguistcs 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Götz, Sandra, Wolk, Christoph & Jäschke, Katja. 2022. Contextualizing fluency in advanced spoken learner language. A contrastive interlanguage analysis across L1s, task types and learning context variables. In Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research, Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska & Sandra Götz (eds), 273-298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Götz, Sandra & Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2018. Investigating the effect of the study abroad variable on learner output: A pseudo-longitudinal study on spoken German learner English. In Learner Corpus Research: New Perspectives and Applications, Vaclav Brezina & Lynne Flowerdew (eds), 47–65. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther. 1997. Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. In Intonation: Theory, Models, and Applications. Proceedings of the ESCA Worshop, September 18–20, Athens, Greece, Antonis Botinis (ed.), 157–160. ESCA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Comparative Intonational Phonology: English and German. PhD dissertation, Max-Planck-Institut for Psycholinguistics and University of Nijmegen.
. 1998b. Pitch accent realization in English and German. Journal of Phonetics 26(21): 129–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Variation adds to prosodic typology. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, 127–132. Aix-en-Provence, France.
. 2004. Intonational variation in urban dialects of English spoken in the British Isles. In Regional Variation in Intonation [Linguistische Arbeiten 492], Peter Gilles & Jörg Peters (eds), 9–31. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther & Low, Ee Ling. 2002. Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Laboratory Phonology 7, Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner (eds), 515–546. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther & Post, Brechtje. 2002. Intonational variation in English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, 343–346. Aix-en-Provence, France.
Grabe, Esther, Kochansky, Greg & Coleman, John. 2005. The intonation of native accent varieties in the British Isles: Potential for miscommunication? In English Pronunciation Models: AChanging Scene [Linguistics Insights: Studies in Language and Communication], Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kolaczyk & Joanna Przedlacka (eds), 311–338. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Post, Brechtje & Nolan, Francis. 2001. The IViE Corpus. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Post, Brechtje, Nolan, Francis & Farrar, Kimberley. 2000. Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics 28(2): 161–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Rosner, Burton S., García-Albea, José E. & Zhou, Xiaolin. 2003. Perception of English intonation by English, Spanish, and Chinese listeners. Language and Speech 46(4): 375–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Nolan, Francis & Farrar, Kimberley. 1998. IViE – A comparative transcription system for intonational variation in English. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 1–4. Sydney, Australia.
Gráf, Tomáš. 2015. Accuracy and Fluency in the Speech of the Advanced Learner of English. PhD dissertation, Charles University Prague.
. 2017. Corpus LINDSEI_CZ. Praha: FF UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Speech rate revisited: The effect of task design on speech rate. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92],Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 175–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gráf, Tomáš & Huang, Lan-Fen. 2019. Repeats in native and learner English. In Fluency and Disfluency across Languages and Language Varieties [Corpora and Language in Use – Proceedings 4], Liesbeth Degand, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Laurence Meurant & Anne Catherine Simon (eds), 219–241. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Calbert. 2013. Revisiting f0 range production in Japanese-English simultaneous bilinguals. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report, 110-125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Calbert & Post, Brechtje. 2018. Second language acquisition of intonation: Peak alignment in American English. Journal of Phonetics 66: 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granena, Gisela & Long, Michael H. 2012. Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research 29(3): 311–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane. 1996. From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In Languages in Contrast. Text-based Cross-linguistic Studies, Karin Aijmer (ed.), 37–51. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. In Learner English on Computer, Sylviane Granger (ed.), 3–18. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Computer learner corpus research: Current status and future prospects. In Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective, Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds), 123–145. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 7–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Have learner corpus research and second language acquisition finally met? In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, Le Bruyn, Bert & Paquot, Magali (eds), 243–257. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Meunier, Fanny. 2016. The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Hung, Joseph & Petch-Tyson, Stephanie (eds). 2002. Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granget, Cyrille & Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth. 2022. Does Japanese/German L1 metrical and tonal structure constrain the acquisition of French L2 morphology? Languages 7(4): 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gravano, Agustín & Hirschberg, Julia. 2009. Backchannel-inviting cues in task-oriented dialogue. In Proceedings of the 10th International Speech Communication Association, 1019–1022. Brighton, UK.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Martine & Baumann, Stefan. 2002. Deutsche Intonation und GToBI. LinguistischeBerichte 191: 267–298.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. An introduction to intonation – Functions and models. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 25–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Martine, Baumann, Stefan & Benzmüller, Ralf. 2005. German intonation in autosegmental -Metrical phonology. In Prosodic Typology, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 55–83. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Martine, Reyelt, Matthias, Benzmüller, Ralf, Mayer, Jörg & Batliner, Anton. 1996. Consistency in transcription and labelling of German intonation with GToBI. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 1996, 1716–1719. Philadelphia, PA.
Grice, Martine, Ritter, Simon, Niemann, Henrik & Roettger, Timo B. 2017. Integrating the discreteness and continuity of intonational categories. Journal of Phonetics 64: 90–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Martine, Sneed German, James & Warren, Paul. 2020. Intonation systems across varieties of English. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody, Carlos Gussenhoven & Aoju Chen (eds), 285–302. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2013. Statistics for Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grieve, Averil. 2010. ‘Aber ganz ehrlich‘: Differences in episodic structure, apologies and truth-orientation in German and Australian workplace telephone discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42(1): 190–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosser, Wolfgang. 1982. Intonatorische Inteferenzerscheinungen Deutsch – English. Wien: Verband der Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Österreichs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Akzentuierung und Intonation im englischen L2-Erwerb österreichischer Lerner [Salzburger Studien zur Anglistik und Amerikanistik 9]. Salzburg: University of Salzburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Aspectsofintonational L2 acquisition. In Current Issues in European Second Language Acquisition Research, Bernhard Kettemann & Wilfried Wieden (eds), 81–94. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. On the acquisition of tonal and accentual features of English by Austrian learners. In Second Language Speech: Structure and Process, Allan James & Jonathan Leather (eds), 207–224. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosvald, Michael. 2009. Inter-speaker variation in the extent and perception of long-distance vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics 37(2): 173–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grover, Cynthia, Jamieson, Donald G. & Dobrovolsky, Michael B. 1987. Intonation in English, French, and German: Perception and production. Language and Speech 30(3): 277–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 1]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunlogson, Christine A. 2001. True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. PhD dissertation, University of California at Santa Cruz.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Intonation and interpretation: Phonetics and phonology. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, 47–57. Aix-en-Provence, France.
. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike. 2000. On the acquisition of rhythmic structure. In New Sounds 2000. Proceedings of the 4th Internation Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Allan James & Jonatan Leather (eds),148–154. Klagenfurt: University of Klagenfurt.
. 2007. Sprachkorpora im Phonetikunterricht. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 12(2): 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Non-Native Speech: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Phonological and Phonetic Properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The LeaP corpus. A phonetically annotated corpus of non-native speech. <[URL]> (30 March 2015).
. 2012. The LeaP corpus: A multilingual corpus of spoken learner German and learner English. In Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 14],Thomas Schmidt & Kai Wörner (eds), 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Corpus phonology and second language acquisition. In The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology, Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut & Gjert Kristoffersen (eds), 286–301. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Phonological development in different learning contexts – A corpus-based study. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 3(2): 196–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike, Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. 2007. Bridging research on phonetic descriptions with knowledge from teaching practice – The case of prosody in non-native speech. In Non-Native Prosody: Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 186], Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 3–24. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Díez, Francisco. 1982. Bases para una comparación de la prosodia del catalán, el castellano y el ingles. PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona.
. 1983. Aspectos lingüísticos de la segmentación del tone en ingles, castellano y catalán. In Actas del primer Congreso Nacional de Lingüística Aplicada, 179–181. Murcia, Spain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. La function demarcative de la entonaciónen ingles castellano y catalán. Murcia: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Intonation focus in the interlanguage of a group of Spanish learners of English. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 18(1): 127–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Contrastive intonation and error analysis. Tonality and tonicity in the interlanguage of a group of Spanish learners of English. In Languages and Cultures in Contrast and Comparison [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series175],María de los Ángeles Gómez González, John Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González Álvarez (eds), 327–354. Amsterdam: Johnson Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Trouble spots in the learning of English intonation by Spanish speakers. Tonality and tonicity. In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 219–230. Dodrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory & Vonwiller, Julia. 1989. The high rising tone in Australian English. In Australian English, Peter Collins & David Blair (eds),21–34. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory, Horvath, Barbara, Vonwiller, Julia, Daisley, Elaine & Rogers, Inge. 1986. An intonational change in Australian English. Language in Society 15(1): 23–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hála, Bohuslav. 1967. Výslovnost spisovné čeŝtiny: Zásady a pravidla. Výslovnost slov českých Díl I. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1963. Intonation in English grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society 62(1): 143–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1970. A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. London: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Zhao Hong. 2009. Interlanguage and fossilization: Towards an analytic model. In Contemporary Applied Linguistics, 1: Language Teaching and Learning, Vivian Cook & Li Wei (eds), 137–162. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Forty years later: Updating the Fossilization Hypothesis. Language Teaching 46(2): 133–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardison, Debra M. 2004. Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning and Technology 8(1): 34–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Contextualized computer-based L2 prosody training: Evaluating the effects of discourse context and video input. CALICO Journal 22(2): 175–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartshorne, Joshua K., Tenenbaum, Joshua B. & Pinker, Steven. 2018. A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition 177: 263–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Havlík, Martin. 2020. Jak čeští mluvčí ’uptalkují’? Presentation, 23 March 2020. < [URL]> (24 January 2022).
Headlandová Kalischová, Irena. 2009. Intonation Centre Placement in English Utterances of Czech Speakers. PhD dissertation, Masaryk University Brno.
Henderson, Alice, Frost, Dan, Tergujeff, Elina, Kautzsch, Alexander, Murphy, Deirdre J., Kirkova-Naskova, Anastazija, Waniek-Klimczak, Ewa, Levey, David, Cunningham, Una & Curnick, Lesley. 2012. The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Selected results. Research in Language 10(1): 5–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henriksen, Nicholas C., Geeslin, Kimberly L. & Willis, Erik W. 2010. The development of L2 Spanish intonation during a study abroad immersion program in León, Spain. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 3(1): 113–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henton, Caroline G. 1989. Fact and fiction in the description of female and male speech. Language and Communication 9(4): 299–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. Pitch dynamism in female and male speech. Language and Communication 15(1): 43–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewings, Martin. 1995. Tone choice in the English intonation of non-native speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 33(3): 251–265.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilton, Heather 2014. Oral fluency and spoken proficiency: Considerations for research and testing. In Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA, Amanda Edmonds, Heather Hilton & Pascale Leclercq (eds), 27–53. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hincks, Rebecca. 2004. Processing the prosody of oral presentations. In Proceedings of InSTIL/ICALL NLP and Speech Technologies in Advanced Language Learning Systems2004, 63–66. Venice, Italy.
Hincks, Rebecca & Edlund, Jens. 2009. Promoting increased pitch variation in oral presentations with transient visual feedback. Language Learning & Technology 13(3): 32–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia. 2000. A corpus-based approach to the study of speaking style. In Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Studies Presented to Gösta Bruce, Merle Horne (ed.),335–350. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Ulla & Trouvain, Jürgen. 2007. Teaching prosody in German as foreign language. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds),171–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirson, Allen, French, Peter & Howard, David M. 1995. Speech fundamental frequency over the telephone and face-to-face: Some implications for forensic phonetics. In Studies in General and English Phonetics.Essays in Honour of Professor J.D. O’Connor, Jack Windsor Lewis (ed.), 230–240. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirst, Daniel, Auran, Cyril & Bouzon, Caroline. 2009. The Aix-MARSEC Database, 2002–2004. Tech. Report, Equipe Prosodie et Représentation Formelle du Langage, Laboratoire CNRS UMR 6057 Parole et Langage, Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirst, Daniel & di Cristo, Albert. 1998. A survey of intonation systems. In Intonation Systems. A Survey of Twenty Languages, Daniel Hirst & Albert di Cristo (eds), 1–44. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoff, Meagan A. 2014. Ethnic Identity and Accent: Exploring Phonological Acquisition for International Students from China. MA thesis, Bowling Green State University.
Holguín Mendoza, Claudia. 2011. Language, Gender, and Identity Construction: Sociolinguistic Dynamics in the Borderlands. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.
Hollien, Harry. 1990. Acoustics of Crime: The New Science of Forensic Phonetics. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hollien, Harry & Paul, Patricia. 1969. A second evaluation of the speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of post-adolescent girls. Language and Speech 12(2): 119–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hollien, Harry & Shipp, Thomas. 1972. Speaking fundamental frequency and chronological age in males. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 15(1): 155–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hollien, Harry, Hollien, Patricia A. & de Jong, Gea. 1997. Effects of three parameters on speaking fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102(5–1): 2984–2992. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horgues, Celine. 2013. French learners of L2 English: Intonation boundaries and the marking of lexical stress. Research in Language 11(1): 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara M. 1985. Variation in Australian English: The Sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge:CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosmer, David W. & Lemeshow, Stanley. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, Jill. 2006. Constructing a context with intonation. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1542–1558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housen, Alex & Kuiken, Folkert. 2009. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 461–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howell, David. C. 2013. Statistical Methods for Psychology. 8th edn. Andover, Hampshire: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howell, Peter & Kadi-Hanifi, Karima. 1991. Comparison of prosodic properties between read and spontaneous speech. Speech Communication 10(2): 163–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2002. Intonation in Spanish and the other Ibero-Romance languages: Overview and status quaestionis. In Romance Phonology and Variation.Selected Papers from the 30th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 217],Caroline R. Wiltshire & Joaquim Camps (eds), 101–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The Sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hualde, José I. & Prieto, Pilar. 2016. Towards an International Prosodic Alphabet (IPrA). Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 7(1): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Lan-Fen & Gráf, Tomáš. 2021. Expanding LINDSEI to spoken learner English from several L1s across CEFR levels. Corpora 16(2): 271–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Lan-Fen. 2019. The construction of spoken English learner corpus from several L1s across CEFR levels. The Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of China. Grant number: MOST 107–2410-H-012-001. Grant amount: USD 23000, Republic of China Naval Academy, Duration: 1 Aug 2018–30 September 2019.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Lan-Fen, Kubelec, Simon, Keng, Nicole & Hsu, Lung-Hsun. 2018. Evaluating CEFR rater performance through the analysis of spoken learner corpora. Language Testing in Asia 8(14): 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, Toby, de Jong, Gea, McDougall, Kirsty, Harrison, Philip & Nolan, Francis. 2007. F0 statistics for 100 young male speakers of standard southern British English. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2007, 1809–1812. Saarbrücken, Germany.
Hulstijn, Jan H. & Marchena, Elaine. 1989. Avoidance: Grammatical or semantic causes? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(3): 241–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunter, Ann-Marie. 2017. Fluency Development in the ESL Classroom: The Impact of Immediate Task Repetition and Procedural Repetition on Learners’ Oral Fluency. PhD dissertation, University of Surrey.
Hurford, James R. 1991. The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition. Cognition 40(3): 159–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, Kenneth & Abrahamsson, Niclas. 2000. Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none? On the maturational constraints controversy in second language acquisition. Studia Linguistica 54(2): 150–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Maturational constraints in SLA. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Catherine Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds), 539–588. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarraran, Amaia, Lasagabaster, David & Sierra, Juan Manuel. 2008. Multilingualism and language attitudes: Local versus immigrant students’ perceptions. Language Awareness 17(4): 326–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Idsardi, William James. 1992. The Computation of Prosody. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
Ioup, Georgette, Boustagui, Elizabeth, El Tigi, Manal & Moselle, Martha. 1994. Reexamining the Critical Period Hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(1): 73–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Shin’ichiro. 2015. Lexical development in L2 English learners’ speeches and writings. Procedia 198: 202–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
J. Murrey Atkins Library. 2019. New South Voices Collection. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Fox, Robert A. & O’Neill, Caitlin. 2009. Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender. Language Variation and Change 21(2): 233–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Fox, Robert Allen & Wei, Lai. 2010. Between-speaker and within-speaker variation in speech tempo of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128(2): 839–850. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakšič, Jan & Šturm, Pavel. 2017. Accents of English at Czech schools: Students’ attitudes and recognition skills. Research in Language 15(4): 353–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
James, Eric, Mahut, Christopher & Latkiewitcz, George. 1989. The investigation of an apparently new intonation pattern in Toronto English. Information Communication 10: 11–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansen, Wouter, Gregory, Michelle L. & Brenier, Jason M. 2001. Prosodic correlates of directly reported speech: Evidence from conversational speech. In ITRW on Prosody in Speech Recognition and Understanding, paper 14. Red Bank, NJ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Järvinen, Kati, Laukkanen, Anna-Maria & Aaltonen, Olli. 2013. Speaking a foreign language and its effect on F0. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 38(2): 47–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott & Pavlenko, Aneta. 2009. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2002. A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an International Language. Applied Linguistics 23(1): 83–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jessen, Michael, Köster, Olaf & Gfroerer, Stefan 2005. Influence of vocal effort on average and variability of fundamental frequency. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 12(2): 174–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, Mei, Green, Raymond J., Henley, Tracy B. & Masten, William G. 2009. Acculturation in relation to the acquisition of a second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 30(6): 481–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, Xiaoming, & Pell, Marc D. 2017. The sound of confidence and doubt. Speech Communication 88: 106–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jilka, Matthias. 2000. The Contribution of Intonation to the Perception of Foreign Accent. PhD dissertation, Stuttgart University.
. 2007. Different manifestations and perceptions of foreign accent in intonation. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 186], Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 77–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiménez Vilches, Raúl. 2017. Analysing four prosodic forms to convey the pragmatic function of dominance and control in L2 monologic discourse. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics 2: 199–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiránková, Lucie, Gráf, Tomáš & Kvítková, Alena. 2019. On the relation between L1 and L2 speech rate. In Widening the Scope of Learner Corpus Research.Selected Papers from the Fourth Learner Corpus Research Conference. Corpora and Language in Use – Proceedings 5, Andrea Abel, Alvars Glaznieks, Verena Lyding & Lionel Nicolas (eds), (pp. 19–41). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiřelová, Karolina. 2018. Language Transfer and Fluency. Diploma thesis, Charles University Prague.
Johnson, Jacqueline S. & Newport, Elissa L. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psycho1ogy 21(1): 60–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. In Prosodic Typology II, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 520–539. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. The ToBI transcription system: Conventions, strengths, and challenges. In Prosodic Theory and Practice, Jonathan Barnes & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel (eds), 151–211. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah & Fletcher, Janet. 2014. Methodology of studying intonation: From data collection to data analysis. In Prosodic Typology, II: The New Development in the Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 493–519. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah & Oh, Mira. 2000. Acquisition of second language intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107(5): 2802–2803. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1996. World Englishes: Agony and ecstasy. Journal of Aesthetic Education 30(2): 135–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, Okim. 2010. Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System 38(2): 301–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Linguistic analysis of speaking features distinguishing general English exams at CEFR levels B1 to C2 and examinee L1 backgrounds. Research Notes 52: 40–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, Okim, Rubin, Don O.N. & Pickering, Lucy. 2010. Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgements of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal 94(4): 554–566. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kartushina, Natalia & Frauenfelder, Ulrich H. 2014. On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele. 1981. Pragmatische Aspekte in der Interimsprache. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kehrein, Roland. 2002. Prosodie und Emotionen [Germanistische Linguistik 231]. Berlin:De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, Niamh. 2022. Change across time in L2 intonation vs. segments: A longitudinal study of the English of Ole Gunnar Solskjaer. Languages 7(3): 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelm, Orlando R. 1995. Acoustic measurements of Spanish and English pitch contours: Native and non-native speakers. Hispanic Linguistics 6(7): 435–448.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Sara & Trofimovich, Pavel. 2008. Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review 64(3): 459–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Midam. 2012. Phonetic Accommodation after Auditory Exposure to Native and Nonnative Speech. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Kim, Midam, Horton, William S. & Bradlow, Ann R. 2011. Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology 2(1): 125–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Ji Young. 2023. Spanish-English cross-linguistic influence on heritage bilinguals’ production of uptalk. Languages 8(22): 165–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Ji Young & Repiso-Puigdelliura, Gemma. 2021. Keeping a critical eye on majority language influence: The case of uptalk inheritage Spanish. Languages 6(1): 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kingdon, Roger. 1958. The Groundwork of English Intonation. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran. 2003. Hesitation. In defence of er and erm. English Studies 84(2): 171–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & Perdue, Clive. 1997. The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klewitz, Gabriele & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1999. Quote-unquote. The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics 9(4): 459–485.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoll, Monja A. & Costall, Alan. 2015. Characterising F(0) contour shape in infant-and foreigner-directed speech. Speech Communication 66: 231–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoll, Monja A. & Uther, Maria. 2004. Motherese and Chinese: Evidence for acoustic changes in speech directed at infants and foreigners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(4): 2522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoll, Monja A., Uther, Maria, MacLeod, Norman, O’Neill, Mark & Walsh, Stig. 2006. Emotional, linguistic or just cute? The function of pitch contours in infant- and foreigner-directed speech. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006, 165–168. Dresden, Germany.
Knowles, Gerald. 1973. Scouse: The Urban Dialect of Liverpool. PhD dissertation, University of Leeds.
Kohler, Klaus J. 1983. Stress-timing and speech rate in German: A productionmodel. Arbeitsberichte Institut für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung Kiel 20: 7–53. Kiel: Kiel University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1986. Parameters of speech rate perception in German words and sentences: Duration, F0 movement and F0 level. Lang Speech 29(2): 115–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Glottal stops and glottalization in German: Data and theory of connected speech processes. Phonetica 51(1–3): 38–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kornder, Lisa & Mennen, Ineke. 2021. Longitudinal developments in bilingual second language acquisition and first language attrition of speech: The case of Arnold Schwarzenegger. Languages 6(2): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreidel, Charles W. 2004. The Pronunciation of English: A Course Book, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 2nd edn. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Künzel, Hermann J. 1989. How well does average fundamental frequency correlate with speaker height and weight? Phonetica 46(1–3): 117–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Some general phonetic and forensic aspects of speaking tempo. Forensic Linguistics 4(1): 48–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyle, Kristopher & Crossley, Scott A. 2015. Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly 49(4): 757–786. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laan, Gitta P.M. 1997. The contribution of intonation, segmental durations, and spectral features to the perception of a spontaneous and a read speaking style. Speech Communication 22(1): 43–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon & Boberg, Charles. 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1983. Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language 59(4): 721–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook 3: 311-340.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Declination ‘reset’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84(2): 530–544. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert 2000. Bruce, Pierrehumbert, and the Elements of Intonational Phonology. In Prosody: Theory and Experiment [Text, Speech and Language Technology], Merle Horne (ed.), 37–50. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational Phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert, Faulkner, Dan, Faulkner, Hanneke & Schepman, Astrid. 1999. Constant “segmental anchoring” of F0 movements under changes in speech rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106(3–1): 1543–1554. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert, Silverman, Kim E.A., Tolkmitt, Frank, Bergmann, Günther & Scherer, Klaus R. 1985. Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and f0 range in signaling speaker affect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 78: 435–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lado, Robert. 1957. Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Women’s Place. New York, NJ: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laméris, Tim. 2022. Non-native Perception, Production, and Lexical Processing of Tone. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1): 159-174.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasagabaster, David. 2005. Attitudes towards Basque, Spanish and English: An analysis of the most influential variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26(4): 296–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasagabaster, David & Sierra, Juan Manuel. 2005. The nativeness factor: An analysis of students’ preferences. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics 148: 21–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laures, Jacqueline S. & Weismer, Gary. 1999. The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 42(5): 1148–1156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Bruyn, Bert & Paquot, Magali (eds). 2021a. Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021b. Learner corpus research and second language acquisition: An attempt at bridging the gap. In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, Bert Le Bruyn & Magali Paquot (eds), 1–9. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Jin-Kyong. 2007. The Inside of the L2 Lexicon and Semantic Overgeneralization. Ms., Michigan State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, William R. 1958. English Intonation: A New Approach. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeman, Adrian. 2009. Intonational variation in Swiss German. In Language Variation – European Perspectives II: Selected Papers from the fourth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 4) Nicosia, June 2007 [Studies in Language Variation 5], Stavroula Tsiplakou, Marilena Karyolemou & Pavlos Pavlou (eds), 135–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lengeris, Angelos. 2012. Teaching and learning English prosody: Lessons from L2 speech perception and production research. In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 25–40. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric H. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lennon, Paul. 1990. Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning 40(3): 387–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lentz, Tomas O. & Chen, Aoju. 2015. Unbalanced adult production and perception of prosody. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–4. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Lepetit, Daniel. 1989. Cross-linguistic influence in intonation: French/Japanese and French/English. Language Learning 39(3): 397–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J.M. 1993. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
J. Murrey Atkins Library. 2019. New South Voices Collection. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levis, John M. 1999. Intonation in theory and practice, revisited. TESOL Quarterly 33(1): 37–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Comparing apples and oranges? Pedagogical approaches to intonation in British and American English. In English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kolaczyk & Joanna Przedlacka (eds), 339–366. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Cinderella no more: Leaving victimhood behind. Speak Out 60(1): 1–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levis, John M. & Pickering, Lucy. 2004. Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology. System 32(4): 505–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levitan, Rivka. 2014. Acoustic-prosodic Entrainment in Human-human and Human-computer Dialogue. PhD dissertation, Columbia University.
Levitan, Rivka & Hirschberg, Julia. 2011. Measuring acoustic prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference of the Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2011, 3081–3084. Firenze, Italy.
Levon, Erez. 2016. Gender, interaction and intonational variation: The discourse functions of high rising terminals in London. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(2): 133–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Same difference: The phonetic shape of high rising terminals in London. English Language and Linguistics 24(1): 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levon, Erez & Ye, Yang. 2020. Language, indexicality and gender ideologies: Contextual effects on the perceived credibility of women. Gender and Language 14(2): 123–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewandowski, Eva M. & Nygaard, Lynne C. 2018. Vocal alignment to native and non-native speakers of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144(2): 620–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewandowski, Natalie. 2012. Talent in Nonnative Phonetic Convergence. PhD dissertation, Stuttgart University.
Lewandowski, Natalie & Jilka, Matthias. 2019. Phonetic convergence, language talent, personality and attention. Frontiers in Communication 4(18): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Peng, Florence Baills, Lorraine Baqué & Prieto, Pilar. 2022. The effectiveness of embodied prosodic training in L2 accentedness and vowel accuracy. Second Language Research 39(4): 1077–1105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, A. & Post, B. 2014. L2 acquisition of prosodic properties of speech rhythm. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(2): 223–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liao, Yan & Fukuya, Yoshinori J. 2004. Avoidance of phrasal verbs: The case of Chinese learners of English. Language Learning 54(2): 193–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan. 1977. On stress and linguistics rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2): 249–336.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightbown, Patsy M. & Spada, Nina. 2013. How Languages are Learned. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Phoebe M.S. 2011. Perception and Production of Prosodically Varying Inter-gestural Timing in American English Laterals. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
. 2012a. Sound evidence: The missing piece of the jigsaw in formulaic language research. Applied Linguistics 33(3): 342–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. More than music to our ears: The value of the phonological interface in a comprehensive understanding of vocabulary acquisition and knowledge. In Multilingual Theory and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, 6–8 September2012, University of Southampton, Alisdair N. Archibald (ed.), 155–158. London: BAAL.
. 2013. The prosody of formulaic expressions in the IBM/Lancaster Spoken English Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4): 561–588. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. The Prosody of Formulaic Sequences: A Corpus and Discourse Approach. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindsey, Geoff. 2019. English after RP: Standard British Pronunciation Today. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linneman, Thomas J. 2013. Gender in Jeopardy! Intonation variation on a television game show. Gender & Society 27(1): 82–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lintunen, Pekka, Peltonen, Pauliina & Webb, Joshua. 2015. Tone units as indicators of L2 fluency development: Evidence from native and learner English. In Investigating English Pronunciation: Trends and Directions, Jose A. Mompean & Jonás Fouz-González (eds), 196–218. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liscombe, Jackson, Hirschberg, Julia & Venditti, Jennifer J. 2005. Detecting certainness in spoken tutorial dialogues. In Proceedings of the 9th International Speech Communication Association, 1837–1840. Lisbon, Portugal.
Litman, Diane, Rotaru, Mihai & Nicholas, Greg. 2009. Classifying turn-level uncertainty using word-level prosody. In Proceedings of the 10th International Speech Communication Association, 2003–2006. Brighton, UK.
Lleó, Conxita & Vogel, Irene. 2004. Learning new segments and reducing domains in German L2 phonology: The role of the prosodic hierarchy. International Journal of Bilingualism 8(1): 79–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, Michael H. 1990. Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12(3): 251–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Stabilization and fossilization in second language interlanguage development. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds), 487–529. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López Rúa, Paula. 2006. The sex variable in foreign language learning: An integrative approach. Porta Linguarum 6: 99–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loveday, Leo. 1981. Pitch, politeness and sexual role: An exploratory investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae. Language and Speech 24(1): 71–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1982. The Sociolinguistics of Learning and Using a Non-Native Language. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowry, Orla. 2002. The stylistic variation of nuclear patterns in Belfast English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32(1): 33–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ludusan, Bogdan & Schuppler, Barbara. 2022. An analysis of prosodic boundaries across speaking styles in two varieties of German. Speech Communication 141: 93–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, William F. 2000. The description of bilingualism. In The Bilingualism Reader, Li Wei (ed.), 26–54. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markham, Duncan. 1997. Phonetic Imitation, Accent, and the Learner. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez-Gómez, Rebeca. 2018. Fresa Style in Mexico: Sociolinguistic Stereotypes and the Variability of Social Meanings. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.
Marzec-Stawiarska, Małgorzata. 2014. Gender differences in foreign language speaking-in-class anxiety. LinguisticaSilesiana 35: 417–434.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsuda, Sae & Gobel, Peter. 2004. Anxiety and predictors of performance in the foreign language classroom. System 32(1): 21–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2006. Signaling and preventing misunderstanding in English as a lingua franca communication. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 177: 123–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, Jörg. 1995. Transcription of German intonation – The Stuttgart system. Technical report, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDougall, Kirsty & Duckworth, Martin 2017. Profiling fluency: An analysis of individual variation in disfluencies in adult males. Speech Communication 95: 16–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKirnan, David J. & Hamayan, Else V. 1984. Speech norms and attitudes toward outgroup members: A test of a model in a bicultural context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3(1): 21–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLemore, Cynthia Ann. 1991. The Pragmatic Interpretation of English Intonation: Sorority Speech. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Meer, Philipp & Fuchs, Robert. 2021. The Trini Sing-Song: Sociophonetic variation in Trinidadian English prosody and differences to other varieties. Language and Speech 65(4): 923–957. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Méndez Seijas, Jorge. 2018. L2 Spanish intonation in a short-term study abroad program. In The Routledge Handbook of Study Abroad Research and Practice, Cristina Sanz & Alfonso Morales-Front (eds), 86–100. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke. 1998. Can language learners ever acquire the intonation of a second language? In Proceedings ETRW on Speech Technology in Language Learning 1998, 17–20. Marholmen, Sweden.
. 2004. Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics 32(4): 543–563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Phonological and phonetic influences in non-native intonation. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 53–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Beyond segments: Towards an L2 intonation learning theory (LILt). In Prosody and Language in Contact: L2 Acquisition, Attrition and Languages in Multilingual Situations, Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie, Mathieu Avanzi & Sophie Herment (eds), 171–188. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke, Chen, Aoju & Karlsson, Fredrik. 2010. Characterising the internal structure of learner intonation and its development over time. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, New Sounds 2010, Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Magdalena Wrembel & Małgorzata Kul (eds), 319–324. Poznań, Poland.
Mennen, Ineke & Colantoni, Laura (eds). 2023. The Effects of Cross-Language Differences on Bilingual Production and/or Perception of Sentence-Level Intonation. Special issue of Languages 8(2): 108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke & de Leeuw, Esther. 2014. Beyond segments. Prosody in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(2): 183–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke, Schaeffler, Felix & Dickie, Catherine. 2014. Second language acquisition of pitch range in German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(2): 303–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke, Schaeffler, Felix & Docherty, Gerard. 2007. Pitching it differently: A comparison of the pitch ranges of German and English speakers. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2007, ICPhS XVI, 1769–1972. Saarbrücken, Germany.
. 2012. Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: A comparison of English and German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131(3): 2249–2260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke, Reubold, Ulrich, Endes, Kerstin & Mayr, Robert. 2022. Plasticity of native intonation in the L1 of English migrants to Austria. Languages 7(3): 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michalsky, Jan & Schoormann, Heike. 2017. Pitch convergence as an effect of perceived attractiveness and likability. In Proceedings of the 18th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2017, 2253–2256. Stockholm, Sweden.
Michas, Irene C. & Berry, Dianne C. 1994. Implicit and explicit processes in a second language learning task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 6(4): 357–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milde, Jan-Torsten & Gut, Ulrike. 2002. A prosodic corpus of non-native speech. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, 503–506. Aix-en-Provence, France.
Miles, Scott A., Miranda, Robbin A. & Ullman, Michael T. 2016. Sex differences in music: A female advantage at recognizing familiar melodies. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Jim E. & Weinert, Regina. 2009. Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Missaglia, Federica. 1999. Contrastive prosody in SLA – An empirical study with adult Italian learners of German. In Proceedings of the XIVthInternational Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 1999, John J. Ohala, Yoko Hasegawa, Manjari Ohala, Daniel Granville & Ashlee C. Bailey (eds),551–554. San Francisco, CA.
Möbius, Bernd. 1993. Ein quantitatives Modell der deutschen Intonation. Analyse und Synthese von Grundfrequenzverläufen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mok, Peggy, Yin, Yanjun, Setter, Jane & Nayan, Noor Mat. 2016. Assessing knowledge of English intonation patterns by L2 speakers. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 8, 1–5. Boston, MA.
Mompeán González, Jose A. 2004. Options and criteria for the choice of an English pronunciation model in Spain. In Linguistic Perspectives from the Classroom: Language Teaching in a Multicultural Europe, JoDee Anderson, Jose Manuel Oro Cabanas & Jesús Varela Zapata (eds), 1043–1059. Santiago de Compostela: Universityof Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monroy, Rafael & Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel. 2015. Murcian Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 45(2): 229–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moyer, Alene. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(1): 81–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Age, Accent, and Experience in Second Language Acquisition: An Integrated Approach to Critical Period Inquiry. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Do language attitudes determine accent? A study of bilinguals in the USA. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 28(6): 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. An investigation of experience in L2 phonology: Does quality matter more than quantity? Canadian Modern Language Review 67(2): 191–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Foreign Accent: The Phonology of Non-native Speech. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. The puzzle of gender effects in L2 phonology. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 2(1): 8–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Autonomy in second language phonology: Choice vs. limits. Language Teaching 50(3): 395–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. An advantage for age? Self-concept and self-regulation as teachable foundations in second language accent. The CATESOL Journal 30(1): 1–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2001. Form and Function of Parasyntactic Presentation Structures: A Corpus-based Study of Talk Units in Spoken English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The native speaker is alive and kicking: Linguistic and language-pedagogical perspectives. Anglistik 16(2): 7–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Simone. 2005. Discourse Markers in Native and Non-Native English Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, Murray J. & Derwing, Tracey M. 1995. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45(1): 73–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners, Language Learning 49(1): 285–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myles, Florence. 2005. Interlanguage corpora and second language acquisition research. Second Language Research 21(4): 373–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagano-Madsen, Yasuko. 2015a. Acquisition process of L2 Japanese intonation by Swedish learners – Interlanguage or prosodic transfer? In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–4. Glasgow, UK.
. 2015b. Prosodic phrasing unique to the acquisition of L2 intonation – An analysis of L2 Japanese intonation by L1 Swedish learners. In Proceedings of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2015, 820–823. Dresden, Germany.
Nakajima, Shin’ya & Allen, James F. 1993. A study on prosody and discourse structure in cooperative dialogues. Phonetica 50(3): 197–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Namy, Laura L., Nygaard Lynne C. & Sauerteig, Denise. 2002. Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(4): 422–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nance, Claire, Kirkham, Sam & Groarke, Eve. 2015. Intonational variation in Liverpool English. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–4. Glasgow, UK.
. 2018. Studying intonation in varieties of English: Gender and individual variation in Liverpool. In Sociolinguistics in England, Natalie Braber & Sandra Jansen (eds), 275–295. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
National Institute for Education. 2017. Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání. <[URL]> (15 November 2019).
Nava, Emily & Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa E. 2009. Order of L2 acquisition of prosodic prominence patterns: Evidence from L1 Spanish/L2 English speech. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America, GALANA 2008, Jean Lenore Crawford, Koichi Otaki & Masahiko Takashi (eds), 175–187. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Navarro Tomás, Tomás. 1974. Métrica española : reseña histórica y descriptiva. Madrid: Guadarrama.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neff, JoAnne, Dafouz, Emma, Rica, Juan P. Díez, Mercedes & Prieto, Rosa. 2009. The status of English in Spain. In International Corpus of Learner English, Version 2, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Sylvie De Cock & Sylviane Granger (eds), 168–174. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1992. Intonation and discourse type. Text 12(3): 397–427.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nibert, Holly Joy. 2000. Phonetic and Phonological Evidence for Intermediate Phrasing in Spanish Intonation. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.
. 2005. The acquisition of the phrase accent by intermediate and advanced adult learners of Spanish as a second language. In Selected Proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, David Eddington (ed.), 108–122. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
. 2006. The acquisition of the phrase accent by beginning adult learners of Spanish as a second language. In Selected Proceedings of the2nd Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonetics and Phonology, Manuel Díaz-Campos (ed.), 131–148. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Niebuhr, Oliver. 2015. Gender differences in the prosody of German questions. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–6. Glasgow, Scotland.
Niebuhr, Oliver & Ward, Nigel G. 2018. Challenges in studying prosody and its pragmatic functions: Introduction to JIPA special issue. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 48(1): 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsenová, Marie. 2006. Rises and Falls: Studies in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Intonation. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Nolan, Francis. 2003. Intonational equivalence: An experimental evaluation of pitch scales. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 771–774. Barcelona, Spain.
Nooteboom, Sieb & Terken, Jacques. 1982. What makes speakers omit pitch accents? An experiment. Phonetica 39(4–5): 317–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nowacka, Marta. 2012. Questionnaire-based pronunciation studies: Italian, Spanish and Polish students’ views on their English pronunciation. Research in Language 10(1): 43–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Barr, William M. & Atkins, Bowman K. 1998[1980]. ‘Women’s language’ or ‘powerless language’? In Language: A Reader for Writers, Gita DasBender (ed.), 401–407. Oxford:OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Brien, Mary & Gut, Ulrike. 2010. Phonological and phonetic realisation of different types of focus in L2 speech. In Achievements and Perspectives in the Acquisition of Second Language Speech. New Sounds 2010, Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Magdalena Wrembel & Malgorzata Kul (eds), 205–215. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connor, Joseph Desmond & Arnold, Gordon F. 1973. Intonation of Colloquial English: APractical Handbook. London: Longmans.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard Nigel. 2010. A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oakhill, Jane & Kyle, Fiona E. 2000. The relation between phonological awareness and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 75(2): 152–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds), 335–58. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard. 2006. Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1752–1775. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard & Routarinne, Sara. 2005. The communicative functions of final rises in Finnish intonation. Phonetica 62(2–4): 160–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohala, John & Ewan, William. 1973. Speed of pitch change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 53: 345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohara, Yumiko. 1999. Performing gender through voice pitch: A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and American English. In Wahrnehmung und Herstellung von Geschlecht: Perceiving and Performing Gender, Ursula Pasero & Friederike Braun (eds), 105–116. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Öhman, Sven. 1967. Word and sentence intonation: A quantitative model. STL-QPSR 8: 2–3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ordin, Mikhail, Polyanskaya, Leona & Ulbrich, Christiane. 2011. Acquisition of timing patterns in second language. In Proceedings of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2011, 1129–1132. Florence, Italy.
Ordin, Mikhail & Mennen, Ineke. 2017. Cross-linguistic differences in bilinguals’ fundamental frequency ranges. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 60(6): 1493–1506. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orrico, Riccardo, Cataldo, Violetta, Savy, Renata & Barone, Linda. 2016. Transfer, fossilization and prosodic drift in foreign language learning. In Atti del XII Convegno Nazionale AISV, La fonetica sperimentale nell’ insegnamento e nell’ apprendimento delle lingue straniere, 117–132. Salerno, Italy.
Ortega, Lourdes. 2009. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes & Byrnes, Heidi (eds). 2008. The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, Marta & Colantoni, Laura. 2014. L2 English intonation: Relations between form-meaning associations, access to meaning and L1-transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(2): 331–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford, Rebecca L. & Ehrman, Madeline. 1993. Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13:188–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford, Rebecca L., Nyikos, Martha & Ehrman, Madeline. 1988. Vive la différence? Reflections on sex differences in use of language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals 21(4): 321–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oyama, Susan. 1976. A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5(3): 261–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palková, Zdena. 1994. Fonetika a fonologieče ŝtiny. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Fonetika a fonologie čeŝtiny, 2nd edn. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palková, Zdena & Volín, Jan. 2003. The role of F0 contours in determining foot boundaries in Czech. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 1783–1786. Barcelona, Spain.
Palmer, Harold E. 1922. English Intonation, With Systematic Exercises. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papoušek, Mechthild & Hwang, Shu-Fen C. 1991. Tone and intonation in Mandarin baby talk to presyllabic infants: Comparison with registers of adult conversation and foreign language instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics 12(4): 481–504. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S. 2006. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4): 2382–2393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Expressing oneself in conversational interaction. In Expressing Oneself/Expressing One’s Self: Communication, Cognition, Language, and Identity, Ezequiel Morsella (ed.), 183–196. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S., Jordan, Kelly, Mallari, Rolliene, Scanlon, Caitlin & Lewandowski, Eva. 2013. Phonetic convergence in shadowed speech: The relation between acoustic and perceptual measures. Journal of Memory and Language 69(3): 183–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, Micah William. 2011. Teaching Intonation Patterns through Reading Aloud. MA thesis, Portland State University.
Pascoe, Graham. 1996. Pronunciation analysis and teaching. PHONUS 2: 109–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Passoni, Elisa, de Leeuw, Esther & Levon, Erez. 2022. Bilinguals produce pitch range differently in their two languages to convey social meaning. Language and Speech 65(4): 1071–1095. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paterson, Ken. 2011. A Handbook of Spoken Grammar: Strategies for Speaking Natural English. Peaslake: Delta Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patkowski, Mark S. 1980. The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning 30(2): 449–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patterson, David. 2000. A Linguistic Approach to Pitch Range Modelling. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Paunović, Tatjana. 2022. Uptalk in L2 English: The phonetic identity and perception of final declarative rises in Seriban EFL. Phonetica 79(6): 551–589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Syder, Frances Hodgetts. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In Language and Communication, Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds), 191–226. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The one-clause-at-a-time hypothesis. In Perspectives on Fluency, Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), 163–199. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peltonen, Paulina. 2018. Exploring connections between first and second language fluency: A mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal 102(4): 676–692. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pépiot, Erwan. 2014. Male and female speech: A study of mean f0, f0 range, phonation type and speech rate in Parisian French and American English speakers. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7, 305-309. Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual. 2010. The death of the adverb revisited: Attested uses of adverbs in native and non-native comparable corpora of spoken English. In Exploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy. Lexis and Corpus-based Language Teaching, María Moreno Jaén, Fernando Serrano Valverde & María Calzada Pérez (eds), 157–172. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pešková, Andrea. 2017. Czech ToBI. Phonetics and Phonology in Europe, June 12–15, 2017. Cologne, Germany.
. 2022. Intonation patterns used innon-neutral statements by Czechlearners of Italian and Spanish: Across-linguistic comparison. Languages 7(4): 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pešková, Andrea, Colantoni, Laura & Meisenburg, Trudel. 2018. Initial and final intonation cues of Czech yes-no questions. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, 50–54. Poznań, Poland.
Peters, Benno. 2003. Multiple cues for phonetic phrase boundaries in German spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 1795–1798. Barcelona, Spain.
. 2006. Form und Funktion prosodischer Grenzen im Gespräch. PhD dissertation, Kiel University.
Peters, Benno, Kohler, Klaus & Wesener, Thomas. 2005a. Phonetische Merkmale prosodischer Phrasierung in deutscher Spontansprache. In Prosodic Structures in German Spontaneous Speech [Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung der Universität Kiel 35a], Klaus J. Kohler, Felicitas Kleber & Benno Peters (eds), 143–184. Kiel: Kiel University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. Melodische Satzakzentmuster in prosodischen Phrasen deutscher Spontansprache: Statistische Verteilung und sprachliche Funktion. In Prosodic Structures in German Spontaneous Speech [Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung der Universität Kiel 35a], Klaus J. Kohler, Felicitas Kleber & Benno Peters (eds), 7–54. Kiel: Kiel University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, Jörg, Auer, Peter, Gilles, Peter & Selting, Margret. 2015. Untersuchungen zur Struktur und Funktion regionalspezifischer Intonationsverläufe im Deutschen. Rückblick auf ein Forschungsprojekt. In Regionale Variation des Deutschen. Projekte und Perspektiven, Roland Kehrein, Alfred Lameli & Stefan Rabanus (eds), 53–80. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrone, Caterina & Niebuhr, Oliver. 2014. On the intonation of German intonation questions: The role of the prenuclear region. Language and Speech 57(1): 108–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrone, Caterina, Truckenbrodt, Hubert, Wellmann, Caroline, Holzgrefe-Lang, Julia, Wartenburger, Isbaell & Höhle, Barbara. 2017. Prosodic boundary cues in German: Evidence from the production and perception of bracketed lists. Journal of Phonetics 61: 71–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, Lucy. 2001. The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly 35(2): 233–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The structure and function of intonational paragraphs in native and non-native speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes 23(1): 19–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Intonation as a pragmatic resource in ELF interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 6(2): 235–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Intonation. In The Linguistics Encyclopedia, Kirsten Malmkjær (ed.),3rd edn, 283–289. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, Lucy & Litzenberg, Jason J. 2011. Intonation as a pragmatic resource in ELF interaction, revisited. In Latest Trends in ELF, Alasdair Archibald, Alessia Cogo & Jennifer Jenkins (eds), 77–92. Newcastle upon Tyne:Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, Lucy, Hu, Guiling & Baker, Amanda. 2012. The pragmatic function of intonation: Cueing agreement and disagreement in spoken English discourse and implications for ELT. In Pragmatics, Prosody in ELT, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 199–218. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. & Garrod, Simon. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2): 169–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation 4(2): 203–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
1981. Synthesizing intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70(4): 985–995. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1987. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2003. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46(2–3): 115–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in Communication, Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds), 271–311. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B., & Talkin, David. 1992. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment, Prosody, Gerard J. Docherty & D. Robert Ladd (eds), 90–117. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth Lee. 1945. The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pincus, Nadya. 2014. Teaching intonation with explicit instruction and audio-visual techniques. In Proceedings of the 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, INTED 2013, 3428–3435. Valencia, Spain.
Pirt, G. 1990. Discourse intonation problems for non-native speakers. In Papers in Discourse Intonation, Martin Hewings (ed.), 145–156. Birmingham: English Language Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piske, Thorsten. 2012. Factors affecting the perception and production of L2 prosody: Research results and their implications for the teaching of foreign languages. In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 41–49. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piske, Thorsten, MacKay, Ian R. A. & Flege, James E. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29(2): 191–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pitzl, Marie-Luise. 2005. Non-understanding in English as a Lingua Franca: Examples from a business context. Vienna English Working Papers 14(2): 50–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2011. Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 39(3): 233–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pon-Barry, Heather. 2008. Prosodic manifestations of confidence and uncertainty in spoken language. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Interspeech 2008, 74–77. Brisbane, Australia.
Pon-Barry, Heather & Shieber, Stuart. 2009. Identifying uncertain words within an utterance via prosodic features. In Proceedings of the 10th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2009, 1579–1582. Brighton, UK.
Pravec, Norma A. 2002. Survey of learner corpora. ICAME Journal 26: 81–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prechtel, Christine & Clopper, Cynthia G. 2016. Uptalk in Midwestern American English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 8, 133–137. Boston, MA.
Preston, Dennis R. 1998. They speak really bad English down South and in New York City. In Language Myths, Laurie Bauer & Peter Trudgill (eds), 139–149. Penguin: London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar & Roseano, Paolo (eds). 2009–2013. Atlas interactivo de la entonación del español. < [URL]> (14 October 2018).
(eds). 2010. Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar & Shih, Chilin. 1996. Pitch downtrend in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 24(4): 445–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Puga, Karin. 2019. English intonation of advanced learners: A contrastive interlanguage analysis. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92], Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 191–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Puga, Karin, Fuchs, Robert., Hudson, Toby, Setter, Jane & Mok, Peggy. 2018. The perception-production link in intonation: Evidence from German learners of English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, 685–689. Poznań, Poland.
Puga, Karin, Fuchs, Robert., Setter, Jane & Mok, Peggy. 2017. The perception of English intonation patterns by German L2 speakers of English. In Proceedings of the 18th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2017, 3241–3245. Stockholm, Sweden.
Purcell, Edward T. & Suter, Richard W. 1980. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination. Language Learning 30(2): 271–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Queen, Robin M. 2006. Phrase-final intonation in narratives told by Turkish-German bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism 10(2): 153–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Turkish-German bilinguals and their intonation: Triangulating evidence about contact-induced language change. Language 88(4): 791–816. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quilis, Antonio. 1993. Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas, 2nd edn. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical Computing. < [URL]> (24 April 2024).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakow, Martin & Lleó, Conxita. 2011. Comparing cues of phrasing in German and Spanish child monolingual and bilingual acquisition. In Intonational Phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-linguistic and Bilingual Studies [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 10], Christoph Gabriel & Conxita Lleó (eds), 213–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramírez Verdugo, M. Dolores. 2002. Non-native interlanguage intonation systems: A study based on a computerized corpus of Spanish learners of English. ICAME Journal 26: 115–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. A Contrastive Analysis of Non-native Interlanguage English Intonation Systems and their Implication in the Organization of Information from a Functional Perspective. A Study based on a Computerized Corpus of Spanish Learners of English. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
. 2005. The nature and patterning of native and non-native intonation in the expression of certainty and uncertainty: Pragmatic effects. Journal of Pragmatics 37(12): 2086–2115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006a. Prosodic realization of focus in the discourse of Spanish learners and English native speakers. EstudiosIngleses de la Universidad Complutense 14: 9–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. Non-native intonation: What information does it transmit? In Corpus Linguistics. Applications for the Study of English [Linguistic Insights 25],Ana María Hornero, María José Luzón & Silvia Murillo (eds), 507–526. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. A cross-linguistic study on the pragmatics of intonation in directives. In Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 205–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Intonation in L2 Discourse: Research Insights. New York, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramírez Verdugo, M. Dolores & Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 2005. The pragmatic function of intonation in L2 discourse: English tag questions used by Spanish speakers. Intercultural Pragmatics 2(2): 151–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2009. Interaction ritual and not just artful performance in crossing and stylization, Language in Society 38(2): 149–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasier, Laurent & Hiligsmann, Philippe. 2007. Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodological issues. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28:41–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raupach, Manfred. 1980. Temporal variables in first and second language speech production. In Temporal Variables in Speech Studies in Honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler, Hans W. Dechert & Manfred Raupach (eds), 263–270. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ray, George B. & Zahn, Christopher J. 1990. Regional speech rates in the United States: A preliminary analysis. Communication Research Reports 7(1): 34–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reitter, David & Moore, Johanna D. 2007. Predicting success in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting – Association for Computational Linguistics, Annie Zaenen & Antal van den Bosch (eds), 808–815. Prague, Czech Republic: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Reyelt, Matthias, Grice, Martine, Benzmüller, Ralf, Mayer, Jörg & Batliner, Anton. 1996. Prosodische Etikettierung des Deutschen mit ToBI. In Natural Language and Speech Technology. Results of the Third KONVENS Conference, Dafydd Gibbon (ed.), 144–155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riesco-Bernier, Silvia. 2012. Same but different: The pragmatic potential of native vs. non-native teachers’ intonation in the EFL classroom. In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 171–198. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riesco-Bernier, Silvia & Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 2008. The acoustics of ‘newness’ and its pragmatic implications in classroom discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40(6): 1103–1116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritchart, Amanda & Arvaniti, Amalia. 2014. The form and use of uptalk in Southern California English. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, 331–335. Dublin, Ireland.
Roach, Peter. 2009[1991]. English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robb, Michael P., Maclagan, Margaret A. & Chen, Yang. 2004. Speaking rates of American and New Zealand varieties of English. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 18(1): 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robles-Puente, Sergio. 2019. Transferencia y erosión de patrones melódicos en bilingües de español e inglésen California. Boletín de Filología 54(1): 283–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodgers, Jonathan. 1999. Tree influences on glottalization. In Phrase-Level Phonetics and Phonology of German, Klaus. J. Kohler (ed.), 173–280. Kiel: Institut für Phonetik und Digitale Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Kiel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The phonatory correlates of juncture in German. In Proceedings of the 5th Seminar on Speech Production: Models and Data, 289–292. Kloster Seeon, Bavaria, Germany.
Rodríguez, Luis J. & Torres, M. Inés. 2006. Spontaneous speech events in two speech databases of human-computer and human-human dialogs in Spanish. Language and Speech 49(3): 333–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogerson-Revell, Pamela. 2011. English Phonology and Pronunciation Teaching. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 2002. The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics 34(6): 769–784. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Adaptive management in discourse: The case of involvement discourse markers in English and Spanish conversations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 81–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2012. Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. ‘Pragmatic punting’ and prosody: Evidence from corpora. In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and Implications [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 247], María A. Gómez González, Francisco José Ruíz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez García & Angela Downing (eds), 209–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Prosodic pragmatics and feedback in intercultural communication. Journal of Pragmatics 151: 91–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús & Lenn, Elizabeth. 2011. Do you “(mis)understand” what I mean? Pragmatic strategies to avoid cognitive maladjustment. Journal of English Studies 9: 223–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús & Llinares-García, Ana. 2004. Prosodic competence in reading aloud: An acoustic corpus-based study of native and non-native (Spanish) speakers of English. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 12: 63–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús & Maguire, Laura. 2011. Adaptive context, the fourth element of meaning. International Review of Pragmatics 3(2): 226–239.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús & Newell, Jessica. 2012. Prosody and feedback in native and non-native speakers of English. In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.),117–132. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosen, Anna. 2019. The use of smallwords in the speech of German learners of English. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching. A Corpus-based Study of the Factors of Instruction and Natural Exposure [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92], Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 220–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Sofia. 2016. Cuppa coffee? Challenges and opportunities of compiling a conversational English corpus in an expanding circle setting. In A Blend of MaLT. Selected Contributions from the Methods and Linguistic Theories Symposium 2015, Hanna Christ, Daniel Klenovšak, Lukas Sönning & Valentin Werner (eds), 49–71. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey & Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1979. Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, George Psathas (ed.), 15–21. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4–1): 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sagisaka, Yoshinori, Campbell, Nick & Higuchi, Norio (eds). 1997. Computing Prosody: Computational Models for Processing Spontaneous Speech. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, Kazuya. 2013. Age effects on late bilingualism: The production development of /r/ by high-proficiency Japanese learners of English. Journal of Memory and Language 69(4): 546–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Experience effects on the development of late second language learners’ oral proficiency. Language Learning 65(3): 563–595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Advanced second language segmental and suprasegmental acquisition. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, Paul A. Malovrh & Alessandro G. Benati (eds), 282–303. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, Kazuya & Hanzawa, Keiko. 2016. The role of input in second language oral ability development in foreign language classrooms: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research 22(4): 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, Yukie & Saito, Kazuya. 2016. Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research 21(5): 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez-Alvarado, Covadonga. 2020. Syntactic and prosodic marking of subject focus in American English and Peninsular Spanish. In Hispanic Linguistics: Current Issues and New Directions [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 26], Alfonso Morales-Front, Michael J. Ferreira, Ronald P. Leow & Cristina Sanz (eds), 184–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel & Barto, Karen. 2017. Introduction Second Language Acquisition, 3rd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scarborough, Rebecca A., Keating, Patricia, Mattys, Sven L., Taehong Cho & Alwan, Abeer. 2009. Optical phonetics and visual perception of lexical and phrasal stress in English. Language and Speech 52(2–3): 135–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scharff-Rethfeldt, Wiebke, Miller, Nick & Mennen, Ineke. 2008. Unterschiede in der mittleren Sprechtonhöhe bei Deutsch/Englisch bilingualen Sprechern. Sprache, Stimme, Gehör 32(3): 123–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schauffler, Nadja. 2021. Alternation Preferences and Focus Marking. PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
Scherer, Klaus R. 2003. Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication 40(1–2): 227–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schilling, Natalie. 2013. Sociolinguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, Ulf. 2016. Language Learning and the Brain. Lexical Processing in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Antje & Lewandowski, Natalie. 2013. Convergence of articulation rate in spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of the 14th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2013, 525–529. Lyon, France.
Schweitzer, Katrin, Walsh, Michael & Schweitzer, Antje. 2017. To see or not to see: Interlocutor visibility and likeability influence convergence in intonation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2017, 919–923. Stockholm, Sweden.
Scovel, Thomas. 1988. A Time to Speak. A Psycholinguistic Inquiry to the Critical Period for Human Speech. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20: 213–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scuffil, Michael. 1982. Experiments in Comparative Intonation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seliger, Herbert W. 1978. Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning. In SLA Research: Issues and Implications, William C. Ritchie (ed.), 11–19. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10(3): 209–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Rediscovering Interlanguage. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selinker, Larry & Lamendella, John T. 1978. Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 3(2): 143–191.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1980. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11(3): 563–605.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2000. The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society 29(4): 477–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Syntax and prosody as methods for the construction and identification of turn-constructional units in conversation. In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 17], Auli Hakulinen & Margret Selting (eds), 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Prosody in interaction: State of the art. In Prosody in Interaction [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 23], Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber & Margret Selting (eds), 3–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Setter, Jane, Wong, Cathy S. P. & Chan, Brian H. S. 2010. Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: EUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheldon Amy & Strange, Winifred. 1982. The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics 19(3): 243–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shevchenko, Tatiana I. & Skopintseva, Tatiana S. 2004. Prosody variation in English: Geographical, social, situational. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, 139–142. Nara, Japan.
Shobbrook, Katherine & House, Jill. 2003. High rising tones in Southern British English. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 1273–1276. Barcelona, Spain.
Shokeir, Vanessa. 2008. Evidence for the stable use of uptalk in South Ontario English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14(2): 16–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shriberg, Lawrence D., Kwiatkowski, Joan & Hoffman, Kit. 1984. A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27(3): 456–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidaras, Sabrina K., Alexander, Jessica E. & Nygaard, Lynne C. 2009. Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(5): 3306–3316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverman, Kim, Beckman, Mary Esther, Pitrelli, John F., Ostendorf, Mari, Wightman, Colin, Price, Patti, Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Hirschberg, Julia. 1992. ToBI: A standard scheme for labeling prosody. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 1992, 867–870. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Šimáčková, Šárka, Kolářová, Katerina & Podlipský, Václav Jonáš. 2014. Tempo and connectedness of Czech-accented English speech. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 5: 667–677.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Adrian P. 2009. Phonetic differences between male and female speech. Language and Linguistics Compas 3(2): 621-640.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skarnitzl, Radek & Hledíková, Hana. 2022. Prosodic phrasing of good speakers in English and Czech. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skarnitzl, Radek & Rumlová, Jana. 2019. Phonetic aspects of strongly-accented Czech speakers of English. Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Philologica 2(Phonetica Pragensia): 109–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skarnitzl, Radek & Vaňková, Jitka. 2017. Fundamental frequency statistics for male speakers of common Czech. Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Philologica 3(Phonetica Pragensia): 7–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, Peter & Foster, Pauline. 1997. Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research 1(3): 185–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Caroline Laws. 2007. Prosodic accommodation by French speakers to a nonnative interlocutor. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2007, 1081–1084. Saarbrücken, Germany.
Smith, Vicki L. & Clark, Herbert H. 1993. On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language 32(1): 25–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smorenburg, Laura, Rodd, Joe & Chen, Aoju. 2015. The effect of explicit training on the prosodic production of L2 sarcasm by Dutch learners of English. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–5. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Snow, Catherine E. & Hoefnagel-Höhle, Marian. 1977. Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds. Language & Speech 20(4): 357–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snow, David & Balog, Heather L. 2002. Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of developmental intonation research. Lingua 112(12): 1025–1058. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonsaat, Sinem. 2017. The Influence of an Online Pronunciation Teacher’s Manual on Teachers’ Cognitions. PhD dissertation, Iowa State University.
Sosa, Juan Manuel. 1999. La entonación del español: Su estructura fónica, variabilidad y dialectología. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speer, Shari R., Warren, Paul & Schafer, Amy J. 2011. Situationally independent prosodic phrasing. Laboratory Phonology 2(1): 35–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speeter Beddor, Patrice. 2015. The relationship between language users’ perception and production repertoires. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–9. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Spezzini, Susan. 2004. English immersion in Paraguay: Individual and sociocultural dimensions of language learning and use. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 7(5): 412–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard. 1989. Conditions for Second Language Learning: Introduction to a General Theory. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staples, Shelley & Reppen, Randi. 2016. Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genre, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing 32: 17–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinberg, Danny D & Sciarini, Natalia. 2006. Introduction to Psycholinguistics, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley, Fletcher, Janet, Mushin, Ilana & Wales, Roger. 2001. Representational issues in annotation: Using the Australian map task corpus to relate to prosody and discourse structure. Speech Communication 33(1–2): 113–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P., Bowen, J. Donald & Martin, John W. 1965. The Grammatical Structures of English and Spanish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeter, Lynn A., Macdonald, Nina H., Apple, William, Krauss, Robert M. & Galotti, Kathleen M. 1983. Acoustic and perceptual indicators of emotional stress. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 73(4): 1354–1360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šturm, Pavel & Lukeš, David. 2017. Fonotaktická analýza obsahu slabik na okrajích českých slov v mluvené a psanéřeči. Slovo a Slovesnost 78(2): 99–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šturm, Pavel & Volín, Jan. 2023. Occurrence and duration of pauses in relation to speech tempo and structural organization in two speech genres. Languages 8: 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suter, Richard W. 1976. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy in second language learning. LanguageLearning 26(2): 233–253.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan (ed). 1990. The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research [Lund Studies in English82], Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. What can real spoken data teach teachers of English? In Georgetown University Round Table of Languages and Linguistics. Linguistics and Language Pedagogy: The State of the Art, James E. Alatis (ed.), 555–566. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swerts, Marc & Geluykens, Ronald. 1994. Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language & Speech 37(1): 21–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swerts, Marc & Hirschberg, Julia. 2010. Prosodic predictors of upcoming positive or negative content in spoken messages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128(3): 1337–1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swerts, Marc & Krahmer, Emiel. 2004. Congruent and incongruent audiovisual cues to prominence. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, 69–72. Nara, Japan.
. 2005. Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing. Journal of Memory and Language 53(1): 81–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice. 2010. Intonation phrases in natural conversation. In Prosody in Interaction [Studies in Discourse & Grammar 23], Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber & Margret Selting (eds), 191–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
’t Hart, Johan & Collier, René. 1975. Integrating different levels of intonation analysis. Journal of Phonetics 3(4): 235–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
’t Hart, Johan, Collier, René & Cohen, Antonie. 1990. A perceptual study of intonation. An experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody [Cambridge Studies in Speech Science and Communication]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tahta, Sonia, Wood, Margaret & Loewenthal, Kate. 1981a. Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to a second language. Language and Speech 24(3): 265–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1981b. Age changes in the ability to replicate foreign pronunciation and intonation. Language and Speech 24(4): 363–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. Cross-cultural Communication. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 4: Discourse Analysis in Society, Teun Adrianus van Dijk (ed.), 203–215. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tauroza, Steve & Allison, Desmond. 1990. Speech rates in British English. Applied Linguistics 11(1): 90–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavakoli, Parvaneh & Skehan, Peter. 2005. Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language [Language Learning & Language Teaching 11], Rod Ellis (ed.), 239–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, David S. 1993. Intonation and accent in English: What teachers need to know. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 31(1): l–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul. 2000. Analysis and synthesis of intonation using the Tilt Model. Technical report, Centre for Speech Technology Research, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tench, Paul. 1996. The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The Intonation Systems of English. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terraschke, Agnes & Holmes, Janet. 2007. Und tralala: Vagueness and general extenders in German and New Zealand English. In Vague Language Explored, Joan Cutting (ed.), 198–220. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. & Kendall, Tyler S. 2019. Prosody. In Mexican American English: Substrate Influence and the Birth of an Ethnolect, Erik R. Thomas (ed.), 215–242. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Jesse, Nguyen, Huy V. & Litman, Diane. 2013. Prosodic entrainment and tutoring dialogue success. In Artificial Intelligence in Education, H. Chad Lane, Kalina Yacef, Jack Mostow & Philip Pavlik (eds), 750–753. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Irene. 1991. Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning 41(2): 177–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tian, Ye, Maruyama, Takehiko & Ginzburg, Jonathan 2017. Self-addressed questions and filled pauses: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46(4): 905–922. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tillmann, Hans. G. & Pfitzinger, Hartmut R. 2003. Local speech rate: Relationships between articulation and speech acoustics. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2003, 3177–3180. Barcelona, Spain.
Toivanen, Juhani. 2003. Tone choice in the English intonation of proficient non-native speakers. In PHONUM9: Proceedings from Fonetik 2003, 1–4. Umeå, Sweden.
Toledo, Guillermo Andres. 1988. El ritmo en elespañol. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomlinson Jr., John M. & Fox Tree, Jean E. 2009. Talking it up: How the function of rising declaratives depends on prolongations and listeners’ expectations. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2009, 1234–1239. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2011. Listeners’ comprehension of uptalk in spontaneous speech. Cognition 119(1): 58–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tortel, Anne. 2013. Prosody in a contrastive learner corpus. In Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpora [Studies in Corpus Linguistics Series 59], Ana Díaz-Negrillo, Nicolas Ballier & Paul Thompson (eds), 227–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tortel, Anne & Hirst, Daniel. 2010. Rhythm metrics and the production of English L1/L2. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, 1–4. Chicago, IL.
Tottie, Gunnel. 2002. An Introduction to American English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2006. Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4): 283–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Towell, Richard, Hawkins, Roger & Bazergui, Nives. 1996. The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics 17(1): 84–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Towell, Richard. 2002. Relative degrees of fluency. A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. International Review of Applied Linguistic in Language 40(2): 117–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole & Paquot, Magali (eds). 2021. Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trafton, Anne. 2018. Cognitive scientists define critical period for learning language: Study shows children remain adept learners until the age of 17 or 18. MIT NEWS Office, 1 May 2018. < [URL]> (15 July 2018).
Trager, George L. & Smith Jr., Henry Lee. 1951. An Outline of English Structure. Washington, DC: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trim, John L. M. 1964. Tonetic stress marks for German. In In Honour of Daniel Jones, David Abercrombie, Dennis Butler Fry, Peter MacCarthy, Norman Carson Scott & John L. M. Trim (eds), 374–383. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Some contrastive intonated features of British English and German. In Essays on the English Language and Applied Linguistics on the Occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th Birthday, Josef Klegraf & Dietrich Nehls (eds), 235–249. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trofimovich, Pavel & Baker, Wendy. 2006. Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect if L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(1): 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five suprasegmentals. Applied Psycholinguistics 28(2): 251–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trouvain, Jürgen. 2001. Phonetic aspects of “speech-laughs”. In Proceedings of the Conference on Orality & Gestuality2001, 634–639. Aix-en-Provence, France.
. Laughing, Breathing, Clicking – The Prosody of Nonverbal Vocalisations. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7, 598-602. Dublin, Ireland.
Trouvain, Jürgen & Braun, Bettina. 2020. Sentence prosody in a second language. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody, Carlos Gussenhoven & Aoju Chen (eds), 605–618. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trouvain, Jürgen & Grice, Martine. 1999. The effect of tempo on prosodic structure. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 1999, 1067–1070. San Francisco, CA.
Trouvain, Jürgen, Zimmerer, Frank, Möbius, Bernd, Gósy, Mária & Bonneau, Anne (eds). 2017. Segmental, Prosodic and Fluency Features in Phonetic Learner Corpora. Special issue of International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 3(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2007. Upstep on edge tones and on nuclear accents. In Tones and Tunes, Vol. 2: Experimental Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody, Carlos Gussenhoven & Tomas Riad (eds), 349–386. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, Joseph C. 2012. Discourse Prosody in Production and Perception. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
Tyler, Joseph. 2014. Rising pitch and quoted speech in everyday American English. In Proceedings to the 7th Speech Prosody Conference 2014, 548–552. Dublin, Ireland.
. 2015. Expanding and mapping the indexical field: Rising pitch, the uptalk stereotype, and perceptual variation. Journal of English Linguistics 43(4): 284–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Gender, questions and phonetic variation in uptalk: A corpus analysis of terminal rising pitch in the Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English. Unpublished manuscript, Morehead State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uhlírová, Ludmila. 1997. Length vs. Order: Word length and clause length from the perspective of word order. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 4(1–3): 266–275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ulbrich, Christiane. 2004. A comparative study of declarative utterances in Swiss and German standards. In Regional Variation in Intonation, Peter Gilles & Jörg Peters (eds), 99–122. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006a. Pitch range is not pitch range. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006, 1–4. Dresden, Germany.
. 2006b. Prosodic phrasing in three German standard varieties. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12(1): 361–373.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Acquisition of regional pitch patterns in L2. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008, 575–578. Campinas, Brazil.
. 2010. Belfast intonation in L2 speech. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, 1–4. Chicago, IL.
. 2012. German pitches in English: Production and perception of cross-varietal differences in L2. Computational Modeling of Bilingualism 16(2): 397–419.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Developmental stages and variability in the acquisition of second language segments and prosody. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–5. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Ulbrich, Christiane & Mennen, Ineke. 2016. When prosody kicks in: The intricate interplay between segments and prosody in perceptions of foreign accent. International Journal of Bilingualism 20(5): 522–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ullakonoja, Riikka. 2007. Comparison of pitch range in Finnish (L1) and Russian (L2). In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2007, 1701–1704. Saarbrücken, Germany.
Urbani, Martina. 2012. Pitch range in L1/L2 English. An analysis of f0 using LTD and linguistic measures. In Methodological Perspectives on Second Language Prosody. Papers from ML2P 2012, 79–83. Padova, Italy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uther, Maria, Knoll, Monja & Burnham, Denis. 2007. Do you speak E-N-G-L-I-S-H? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech. Speech Communication 49(1): 2–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uzal, Melike, Peltonen, Teemu, Huotilainen, Minna & Aaltonen, Olli. 2015. Degree of perceived accent in Finnish as a second language for Turkish children born in Finland. Language Learning 65(3): 477–503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Bezooijen, Reneé. 1995. Sociocultural aspects of Pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Lang Speech 38(3): 253–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Els, Theo & de Bot, Kees. 1987. The role of intonation in foreign accent. The Modern Language Journal 71(2): 147–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Maastricht, Lieke, Zee, Tim, Krahmer, Emiel & Swerts, Marc. 2021. The interplay of prosodic cues in the L2: How intonation, rhythm, and speech rate in speech by Spanish learners of Dutch contribute to L1 Dutch perceptions of accentedness and comprehensibility. Speech Communication 133: 81–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vergara, Daniel. 2015. Uptalk in Spanish dating shows? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 187–196.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veroňková, Jitka & Tolkunova, Yana. 2016. Vowel-related glottalization in Czech read speech: Russian vs. native speakers. Studie z Aplikované Lingvistiky 1: 93–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene. 1991. Prosodic phonology: Second language acquisition data as evidence in theoretical phonology. In Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories [Language Acquisition & Language Disorders 2], Thom Huebner & Charles A. Ferguson (eds),47–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voigt, Stefanie & Schüppert, Anja. 2013. Articulation rate and syllable reduction in Spanish and Portuguese. In Phonetics in Europe: Perception and Production, Charlotte S. Gooskens & Renee van Bezooijen (eds), 317–332. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volín, Jan. 2008. Z intonace čtených zpravodajství: Výška první slabiky v taktu. Čeština doma a ve světě 1–2: 89–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. The size of prosodic phrases in native and foreign-accented read-out monologues. Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Philologica 2 (PhoneticaPragensia XV): 145–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volín, Jan & Galeone, Damien. 2017. Prosodic phrases in native and foreign-accented speech. Accents 2017. Accents in use. Łódź, Poland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Prosodic breaks in foreign-accented speech. Accents 2018. Accents go to School. Łódź, Poland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volín, Jan & Johaníková, Terezie. 2018. Weak structural words in British and Czech English. In The Pronunciation of English by Speakers of Other Languages, Jan Volín & Radek Skarnitzl (eds), 181–195. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volín, Jan & Skarnitzl, Radek. 2007. Temporal downtrends in Czech read speech. In Proceedings of the 8th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2007, 442–445. Antwerp, Belgium.
. 2010a. Suprasegmental acoustic cues of foreigness in Czech English. In Proceedings of Odyssey 2010: The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, 271–278. Brno, Czech Republic.
. 2010b. The strength of foreign accent under adverse listening conditions. Speech Communication 52(11–12): 1010–1021. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volín, Jan, Galeone, Damien & Johnson, Wesley. 2017. Pitch range of intonation contours in English Czech. Philologica 3: 55–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volín, Jan, Poesová, Kristyna & Weingartová, Lenka. 2015. Speech melody properties in English, Czech and Czech English: Reference and interference. Research in Language 13(1): 107–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volín, Jan, Skarnitzl, Radek & Henderson, Alice. 2018. Perceptual impact of foreign-accented speech. In The Pronunciation of English by Speakers of Other Languages, Jan Volín & Radek Skarnitzl (eds), 73–94. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vykouková, Martina. 2014. The Approach of Czech Upper-secondary English Teachers to Pronunciation Teaching. MA thesis, Charles University Prague.
Walker, Abby & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2015. Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, Robin. 1999. Proclaimed and perceived wants and needs among Spanish teachers of English. Speak Out! 24(1): 25–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory & Hirschberg, Julia. 1985. Implicating uncertainty: The pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language 61(4): 747–776. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, Nigel G. & Gallardo, Paola. 2015. A corpus for investigating English-language learners’ dialog behaviors. UTEP Technical Report, 1–8.
. 2017. Non-native differences in prosodic-construction use. Dialogue & Discourse 8(1): 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, Nigel G. 2015. Midlevel prosodic features toolkit. < [URL]> (28 April 2024).
Warren, Paul. 2005. Patterns of late rising in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 17(2): 209–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Uptalk. The Phenomenon of Rising Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warren, Paul & Britain, David. 2000. Intonation and prosody in New Zealand English. In New Zealand English [Varieties of English Around the World G25], Allan Bell & Koenraad Kuiper (eds), 146–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warren, Paul & Daly, Nicola. 2005. Characterizing New Zealand English intonation: Broad and narrow analysis. In Languages of New Zealand, Allan Bell, Ray Harlow & Donna Starks (eds), 217–237. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weingartová, Lenka, Churaňová, Eliška & Šturm, Pavel. 2014b. Transitions, pauses and overlaps: Temporal characteristics of turn-taking in Czech. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014, 502–506. Dublin, Ireland.
Weingartová, Lenka, Poesová, Kristyna & Volín, Jan. 2014a. Prominence contrasts in Czech English as a predictor of learner’s proficiency. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014, 236–240. Dublin, Ireland.
Wells, John Christopher. 2006. English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Sounds Interesting: Observations on English and General Phonetics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wennerstrom, Ann. 1994. Intonational meaning in English discourse: A study of non-native speakers. Applied Linguistics 15(4): 399–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse. Studies of Second Language Acquisition 20(1): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The Music of Everyday Speech: Prosody and Discourse Analysis. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wennerstrom, Ann & Siegel, Andrew F. 2003. Keeping the floor in multiparty conversations:Intonation, syntax, and pause. Discourse Processes 36(2): 77–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin, Fuchs, Robert & Götz, Sandra. 2021. L1 influence vs. universal mechanisms: An SLA-driven corpus study on temporal expression. In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, Bert Le Bruyn & Magali Paquot (eds), 39–66. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne. 2000. Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles, and Ends. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne & Caspers, Johanneke. 2001. Melodic cues to turn-taking in English: Evidence from perception. In Proceedings of the 2nd SIG dial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, 180–185. Aalborg, Denmark.
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard. 1983. Psycholinguistische Aspekte der Sprachproduktion: Sprachverhalten und Verbalisierungsprozesse. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willems, Nico. 1982. English Intonation from a Dutch Point of View. Ambach: Intercontinental Graphics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willis, Erik W. 2010. Dominican Spanish intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, Pilar Prieto & Paolo Roseano (eds), 123–153. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1986a. Research methodology and the question of validity. TESOL Quarterly 20(4): 689–699. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986b. The bulge: A theory of speech behavior and social distance. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 2(1): 55–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolk, Christoph, Götz, Sandra & Jäschke, Katja. 2021. Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables. Corpus Pragmatics 5: 7–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wollermann, Charlotte. 2012. Prosodie, nonverbal Signale, Unsicherheit und Kontext – Studien zur pragmatischen Fokusinterpretation. PhD dissertation, University of Duisburg-Essen.
Wray, Alison. 2008. Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Li-Chiung. 2004. Duration and pauses as cues to discourse boundaries in speech. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, 267–270. Nara, Japan.
Yngve, Victor H. 1970. On getting a word in edgewise. In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society, 567–577. Chicago, IL.
Yu, Alan C. L., Abrego-Collier, Carissa & Sonderegger, Morgan. 2013. Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality and ‘autistic’ traits. PloS One 8(9): e74746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Jenny & Zahner, Katharina. 2018. Truncation and compression in Southern German and Australian English. In Proceedings of the 19th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2018, 1833–1837. Hyderabad, India.
Yu, Guoxing. 2009. Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics 31(2): 236–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, George. 1980. Speakers’ topics and major paratones. Lingua 52(1–2): 33–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zahner, Katharina & Yu, Jenny. 2019. Compensation strategies in non-native English and German. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2019, 1670–1674. Melbourne, Australia.
Zárate-Sández, Germán. 2015. Perception and Production of Intonation among English-Spanish Bilingual Speakers at Different Proficiency Levels. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.
. 2016. Categorical perception and prenuclear pitch peak alignment in Spanish. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 8, 663–667. Boston, MA.
. 2017. Reexamining foreign accent: How much can personality explain? Ilha do Desterro 70(3): 227–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Production of final boundary tones in declarative utterances by English speaking learners of Spanish. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, 927–931. Poznań, Poland.
Zerbian, Sabine, Zuban, Yulia & Klotz, Martin. 2024. Intonational Features of Spontaneous Narrations in Monolingual and Heritage Russian in the U.S. - An Exploration of the RUEG Corpus. Languages 9(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zellers, Margaret & Schweitzer, Antje. 2017. An investigation of pitch matching across adjacent turns in a corpus of spontaneous German. In Proceedings of the 18th International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2017, 2336–2340. Stockholm, Sweden.
Zellner, Brigitte. 1994. Pauses and the temporal structure of speech. In Fundamentals of Speech Synthesis and Speech Recognition, Eric Keller (ed.), 41–62. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmerer, Frank, Andreeva, Bistra, Jügler, Jeanin & Möbius, Bernd. 2015. Comparison of pitch profiles of German and French speakers speaking French and German. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2015, 1–5. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Zimmerer, Frank, Jügler, Jeanin, Andreeva, Bistra, Möbius, Bernd & Trouvain, Jürgen. 2014. Too cautious to vary more? A comparison of pitch variation in native and non-native productions of French and German speakers. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7, 1037–1041. Dublin, Ireland.
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Nava, Emily. 2011. Encoding discourse-based meaning: Prosody vs. syntax. Implications for second language acquisition. Lingua 121(4): 652–669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zvonik, Elena & Cummins, Fred. 2003. The effect of surrounding phrase lengths on pause duration. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Eurospeech 2003, 777–780. Geneva, Switzerland.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue