Cover not available

In:Variation in University Student Writing: A communicative text type approach
Larissa Goulart
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 117] 2024
► pp. 209–213

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

References

Published online: 22 August 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.117.refs
Aull, L. (2015). First-year university writing: A corpus-based study with implications for pedagogy. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbieri, F., & Wizner, S. (2019). Appendix A: Annotation of major register and genre studies. In D. Biber & S. Conrad (Eds.), Register, genre, and style (pp. 318–364). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benitez-Castro, M. A. (2021). Shell-noun use in disciplinary student writing: A multifaceted analysis of problem and way in third-year undergraduate writing across three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 132–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berber-Sardinha, T., Pinto, M. V., Mayer, C., Zuppardi, M. C., & Kauffmann, C. H. (2019). Adding registers to a previous multi-dimensional analysis. In T. Berber-Sardinha & M. Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 165–186). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 31–56). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2018). Register variation online. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Keller, D. (2019). Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 581–616. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 581–616. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., Keller, D. R., & Wizner, S. (2021a). Describing registers in a continuous situational space: Case studies from the web and natural conversation. In E. Seoane & D. Biber (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to register variation (pp. 19–50). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., Keller, D., & Wizner, S. (2021b). Towards a taxonomy of conversational discourse types: An empirical corpus-based analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 20–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, B., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education. Also published as Biber, B., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar of spoken and written English. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Reppen, R., & Staples, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between TOEFL iBT scores and disciplinary writing performance. TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 948–960. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, A., Dixon, T., Goulart, L. & Wizner, S. (2021). Register and register variation. Oxford bibliographies online research guide. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bridgeman, B., & Carlson, S. B. (1984). Survey of academic writing tasks. Written Communication, 1(2), 247–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britton, J. (1975). The development of writing abilities (pp. 11–18). Macmillan Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruce, I. (2010). Textual and discoursal resources used in the essay genre in sociology and English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 153–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Çandarlı, D. (2022). Linguistic characteristics of online academic forum posts across subregisters, L1 backgrounds, and grades. Lingua, 267, 103190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles, M. (2006). Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 310–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), 30–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrey, A. L., Lee, H. B. (1992) A first course in factor analysis. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, S. M. (1996). Academic discourse in two disciplines: Professional writing and student development in biology and history (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couture, B. (1986). Effective ideation in written text: A functional approach to clarity and exigence. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Retrieved on 27 April 2024 from [URL]
Eblen, C. (1983). Writing across-the-curriculum: A survey of a university faculty’s views and classroom practices. Research in the Teaching of English, 17(4), 343–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, J. (2014). Reader perceptions of linguistic variation in published academic writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.
Egbert, J., & Staples, S. (2019). Doing multi-dimensional analysis in SPSS, SAS, and R. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 125–144). Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, S., & Holmes, J. (2009). Can I use headings in my essay? Section headings, macrostructures and genre families in the BAWE corpus of student writing. In M. Charles, S. Hunston, & D. Pecorari (Eds.), Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse (pp. 252–271). Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, S., & Nesi, H. (2013). A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied linguistics, 34(1), 25–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, S., Nesi, H., & Biber, D. (2019). Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 646–674. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, S., & Powell, L. (2006). An investigation of genres of assessed writing in British higher education: A Warwick-Reading-Oxford Brookes project. In Research, scholarship and practice in the area of academic literacies. University of Westminster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Strömsö, H. I. (2010). Understanding and integrating multiple science texts: Summary tasks are sometimes better than argument tasks. Reading Psychology, 31(1), 30–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. (2015). Factor analysis. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goulart, L. (2016). Compilation of a Brazilian academic written English corpus. Revista e-scrita: Revista do Curso de Letras da UNIABEU, 8(2), 32–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goulart, L., Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2022). In this essay, I will…: Examining variation of communicative purpose in university writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 59, 101159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goulart, L., & Staples, S. (2023). Multidimensional analysis. In M. Kessler & C. Polio (Eds.), Conducting genre-based research in applied linguistics (pp. 127–148). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goulart, L., & Wood, M. (2021). Methodological synthesis of research using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science, 6(2), 107–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Tagging and counting linguistic features for multi-dimensional analysis. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 43–66). Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, G., Taylor, C., Bridgeman, B., Carson, J., Kroll, B., & Kantor, R. (1994). A study of writing tasks assigned in academic degree program. TOEFL Research Reports (Vol. 44).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). A study of writing tasks assigned in academic degree program. TOEFL Research Reports, 44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, J. A., & Römer, U. (2013). Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 8(2), 183–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, J. A., & Friginal, E. (2016). Genre variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 119–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heuboeck, A., Holmes, J., & Nesi, H. (2010). The BAWE corpus manual, Version III.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewings, M., & Hewings, A. (2002). “It is interesting to note that…”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), 367–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horowitz, D. M. (1986). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL quarterly, 20(3), 445–462. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text & Talk, 18(3), 349–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008a). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2021). A bibliometric study of EAP research: Who is doing what, where and when? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 100929. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Tsé, P. (2007). Is there an “academic vocabulary”? TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 235–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T., & Raulerson, B. A. (2007). Improving the writing skills of college students. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 237–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsson, T. (2016). The introductory it pattern: Variability explored in learner and expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 64–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsson, T., Paquot, M., & Biber, D. (2021). On the importance of register in learner writing. In E. Seoane & D. Biber (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to register variation (pp. 235–258). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). “Completely different worlds”: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 39–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, L., & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 150–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Rothery, J. (1986). What a functional approach to the writing task can show teachers about ‘good writing’. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives (pp. 241–265). Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melzer, D. (2009). Writing assignments across the curriculum: A national study of college writing. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), 240–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moran, K. E. (2013). Exploring undergraduate disciplinary writing: Expectations and evidence in psychology and chemistry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University.
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2006). Variation in disciplinary culture: University tutors’ views on assessed writing tasks. In R. Kiely, P. Rae-Dickins, H. Woodfield, & G. Clibbon (Eds.), Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics (pp. 99–117). Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2012). From student hard drive to web corpus, (part 2): The annotation and online distribution of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 7(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rashid, A., & Mahmood, M. A. (2019). Linguistic variations across disciplines: A multidimensional analysis of Pakistani research articles. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 34–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Revelle, W. (2021). How to use the psych package for mediation/moderation/regression analysis. The Personality Project. Retrieved on 27 April 2024 from [URL]
Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2011). From student hard drive to web corpus, (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 6(2), 159–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The ethnography of communication: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staples, S., Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2018). Using corpus-based register analysis to explore the authenticity of high-stakes language exams: A register comparison of TOEFL iBT and disciplinary writing tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 310–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, 33(2), 149–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staples, S., & Reppen, R. (2016). Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 17–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tasker, D. G. (2019). Situational and linguistic variation in undergraduate English-department student writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.
(2022). A case study of the variety of writing assignments in an undergraduate English department. English for Specific Purposes, 66, 33–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. R. (2011). Argumentation across the curriculum. Written Communication, 28(2), 193–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, H. R. (2020). Stand-alone literature reviews. In U. Römer-Barron, V. Cortes, & E. Friginal (Eds.), Advances in corpus-based research on academic writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise (pp. 307–322). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, B., & Paltridge, B. (2021). Stance expressions in academic writing: A corpus-based comparison of Chinese students’ MA dissertations and PhD theses. Lingua, 253, 103071.
Zhu, W. (2004). Writing in business courses: An analysis of assignment types, their characteristics, and required skills. English for Specific purposes, 23(2), 111–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue